Extending coordination theory for multi-organisational disaster coordination
Summary
Despite technological and theoretical advances in disaster management, Australian government organisations still find inter-service coordination of resources, information and knowledge extremely challenging, with considerable implications for economic and social costs. However, there is the clear lack of measurement scales for use that are grounded in theory and empirically validated in field studies. In this research, coordination theory is applied and extended to better understand how inter-service disaster management agencies actually coordinate (or manage disaster-related dependencies) task, resource, knowledge and expertise. More specifically, the project has two objectives: (1) to understand the problem of multi-organizational disaster “coordination gaps” (mismatches between required and actual coordination) in disaster management contexts; and (2) to develop and validate a reliable measure of “coordination gaps”, using a multi-method approach: a review of multi-disciplinary literatures of coordination studies, focus groups of disaster management experts, and a confirmatory factor analysis of survey data from frontline disaster coordinators in NSW. The expected outcomes of this research are: (i) better understanding of the inter-service coordination gaps in practice (ii) empirically validated measurement scales of coordination gaps for use in disaster management for improved inter-service disaster coordination, and (iii) the application of extended coordination theory in the context of disaster management.
Supervisor(s)
Research Location
Program Type
Masters/PHD
Synopsis
This project provides the empirically validated measurement scales for identifying actual coordination gaps in practice and help emergency services better understand evidence-based improvements for inter-service and inter-agency disaster coordination in Australia, with significant economic and social benefits to these organizations, communities, and people. Furthermore, the project objectives reduce the knowledge gap identified by leading researchers in coordination. Finally, these objectives also align directly with three of the four national research priorities (NRPs) according to the Australian Research Council (ARC): “an environmentally sustainable Australia; frontier technologies for building and transforming Australian industries; and safeguarding Australia”.
Want to find out more?
Contact us to find out what’s involved in applying for a PhD. Domestic students and International students
Contact Research Expert to find out more about participating in this opportunity.
Browse for other opportunities within the Civil Engineering .
Keywords
Coordination theory, disaster management, coordination, coordination gap, social network, knowledge, expertise
Opportunity ID
The opportunity ID for this research opportunity is: 1380
Other opportunities with Dr Kenneth Chung
- Individual and team learning & performance in a virtual context: a social network & system dynamics approach
- Towards a social networks model for understanding factors for variances in cost and schedule in project implementation and project completion times
- Community building through online social networks: evolution and engagement
- Modelling social network structure, technology use and care coordination
- Towards a social network-inspired model for understanding evidence uptake and pain management in cancer care
- Towards a social network-inspired model for improving medical referrals in cancer care
- Social networks model for Open Source Drug Discovery
- Social capital, brokerage, technology use and performance of project-based workers: Real estate agents in NSW, Australia
- Towards a social networks model for understanding teaching and learning in the CPC
- Determining Value and Impact of the CPC through stakeholder analysis