The University’s Academic Board approved a new Academic Integrity Policy 2022 and Academic Integrity Procedures 2022 in November 2022. You can now access an overview of the main changes to the policy and procedures in 2023. These changes include new requirements about the use of writing assistance tools and artificial intelligence.
The information on this page applies to students who have been reported for breaches of academic integrity for units of study in 2022 and January and February intensive units in 2023.
This information will be updated to reflect any relevant changes in the policy and procedures that will apply once the new academic integrity and case management system are implemented on 20 March 2.
The procedure for handling incidents of academic dishonesty is outlined in the Academic Honesty in Coursework Policy and Academic Honesty Procedures. This also explains the University’s position on breaches of academic integrity as well as your responsibilities and those of staff members.
Reported incidents are given to the relevant faculty’s Educational Integrity Coordinator or one of its nominated academics for investigation.
If a report is made about you, the Educational Integrity Coordinator or nominated academic will carry out an initial investigation in which they will consider why the incident was reported.
All available evidence will be considered. This may include the work you submitted, similarity-detection software reports, source publications, examination incident reports and prohibited materials confiscated during an examination.
Once the initial investigation is carried out, one of the following decisions will be made.
The Educational Integrity Coordinator or nominated academic will inform you in writing if you are required to complete a development course, respond to a formal allegation, or if the matter has been referred to the Registrar.
If you are asked to respond to a formal allegation of academic dishonesty, or you do not complete a development course when requested, you will be asked to have a meeting with the Educational Integrity Coordinator or nominated academic.
The meeting will usually take about 15 to 20 minutes and will include at least you, the Educational Integrity Coordinator and a professional staff member from the faculty. You can bring a support person, and occasionally your teacher or examination invigilator (supervisor) will be asked to attend.
If you cannot attend the meeting, you can request that it be rescheduled, or you can respond in writing. In most cases, you can have up to five additional working days to respond.
Before you respond to an allegation either at a meeting or in writing, you can seek advice and support from one of the independent student advocacy services.
Once you have responded to the formal allegation, or the time allowed for you to respond has elapsed, the Educational Integrity Coordinator or nominated academic will consider your response and the evidence available.
One of the following decisions will be made.
The Educational Integrity Coordinator or nominated academic will inform you in writing of the outcome, any actions that are to be taken and penalties to be applied. They will also notify the unit of study coordinator and the person who reported the incident of the outcome.
Your case may be considered more serious if it involves contract cheating or you have repeatedly been reported for academic dishonesty. In this situation, a penalty greater than failure of the unit of study may be considered necessary.
If this is the case, the Educational Integrity Coordinator or nominated academic may refer your case to the Registrar for consideration under the University of Sydney (Student Discipline) Rule.
You can find more information on matters investigated by the Registrar on the misconduct page.