Skip to main content
Unit of study_

LAWS5196: United States Constitutional Law

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court exert significant influence on constitutionalism globally. This unit provides an in-depth introduction to the principles, core concepts, key cases, and current developments in US Constitutional Law. It traces the structure and role of the US Supreme Court, and the development of US constitutional reasoning from the post-revolutionary period to the present. It considers debates about constitutional interpretation, and the significance of different approaches to key provisions of the Constitution. Topics may include all or any of: federalism and the commerce clause; eminent domain and "just compensation"; substantive due process; equal protection of the laws: race and gender discrimination; freedom of speech; freedom of religion; unenumerated rights; constitutional protection of citizenship and voting. Students will also be introduced to, and encouraged to engage in, normative debates about constitutional values.

Unit details and rules

Unit code LAWS5196
Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS3496
Prerequisites
? 
LAWS5011
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Jeffrey Gordon, jeffrey.gordon@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Long Release Problem-Based Assignment
Problem-Based Assignment
30% Week 06
Due date: 28 Mar 2022 at 15:00

Closing date: 04 Apr 2022
2000wds/4 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment Long Release Final Research Essay
Final Research Essay
70% Week 12
Due date: 16 May 2022 at 15:00

Closing date: 06 Jun 2022
4000wds/8 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Assessment summary

Problem-Based Assignment. Each student must submit a problem-based assignment. The problem will be released on Monday 28 February 2022 at 3pm. The assignment is due on Monday 28 March 2022 at 3pm. The purpose of the assignment is to test material covered in class. The assignment will cover all material discussed in class up to and including the final class before the date for submission. Unlike a research essay, the problem-based assignment is designed to be completed substantially from the material discussed in class (although students may refer to other sources if appropriate).

Final Research Essay. Each student must submit a research essay. This essay is due on Monday 16 May 2022 at 3pm. The essay should demonstrate critical engagement with a relevant topic based on independent research. Students must either answer one of the questions provided by the teacher or write on a subject of their own choice. Students who wish to write on a topic of their own choice are strongly advised to develop that topic in consultation with the teacher. Essay plans must be submitted to the coordinator by Monday 4 April 2022 at 3pm. 

For both assessments, each student is solely responsible for ensuring that the correct and uncorrupted version of their submission is uploaded to the appropriate Canvas dropbox.

All submissions uploaded after the due date and time will be accepted by Canvas but will be recorded as late. The date and time of submission as recorded by Canvas is the official and final record of submission. If a student uploads multiple versions of a document, then the final document uploaded is the document that will be marked.

Students are requested to retain pre-submitted drafts of their written assignments on file.

If a student successfully applies for Special Consideration, then the form of consideration is at the Unit Coordinator’s discretion (and may include alternative assessments such as oral examinations).

A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers a descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject area.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

A student who has not obtained an extension by applying successfully for Special Consideration will be penalised for late submission of written work at a rate of 5% of the total mark for the assignment per day or part-day (including weekends and public holidays). Subject to a ten-minute grace-period, penalties for late submission will be strictly applied.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction; The United States court system Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 02 Marbury v Madison and judicial review; McCulloch v Maryland and legislative power Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 03 Lochner v New York and substantive due process; the commerce clause Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 04 Freedom of speech: principles and levels of protection; freedom of speech: the new Lochner? Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 05 Race and the Constitution: before the Civil War; Race and the Constitution: the Civil War amendments Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 06 Race and the Constitution: Brown v Board of Education; sex equality Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Reproductive rights; sexuality and marriage Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 09 Affirmative action; voting rights Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 10 Presidential power: the Publian premise; Presidential power: the veto Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 11 Theoretical perspectives; current debates Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes (or as otherwise specified by the Unit Coordinator) to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Attendance requirements may be satisfied by in person attendance as per the delivery mode of the unit. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment.

Word count penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. In this Unit of Study, the total word count for written assessments includes footnotes.

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is https://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au/c.php?g=508212&p=3476376

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library’s reading list system Leganto, available on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Develop an understanding of the U.S. Constitution, its animating principles, and approaches to its interpretation.
  • LO2. Develop familiarity with the concepts and theoretical resources of U.S. constitutional law, and with key cases concerning a selection of the Constitution's provisions.
  • LO3. Develop the ability to engage in normative debates about constitutional values.
  • LO4. Develop the ability to research and write about U.S. constitutional law.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

The assessment regime has changed since this unit was last offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.