Skip to main content
Unit of study_

AERO9260: Aerodynamics 1

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit of study should prepare students to be able to undertake aerodynamic performance calculations for industry design situations. The unit aims to develop a knowledge and appreciation of the complex behaviour of airflow in the case of two dimensional aerofoil sections and three dimensional wings; To encourage hands-on experimentation with wind-tunnel tests to allow an understanding of these concepts and their range of applicability. To understand the limitations of linearised theory and the effects of unsteady flow. At the end of this unit students will be able to: predict flow properties for general aircraft wing sections to obtain lift, drag and pitching moment; extrapolate section results to predict full three dimensional wing behaviour; undertake experiments and analyse data to verify theoretical predictions; construct simple computer algorithms that will allow more complex geometries to be solved; understand the limitations of theory and the effect of second order parameters (Reynolds number, Mach Number) to the primary flow properties. Course content will include: construction and designation of two dimensional aerofoil sections; point vortex model of aerofoil; Joukowski transformation theory; thin aerofoil theory; linear lift properties for sections; limiting effects such as stall; calcualtion of pitching moment coefficient; methods for estimation of boundary flow and friction drag calculations; viscous-inviscid panel method numerical solutions; modelling of three dimension wing flows; lifting line theory and vortex lattice method; effects of downwash, aspect ratio, sweep angle and asymmetry.

Unit details and rules

Unit code AERO9260
Academic unit Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
AERO8260
Prerequisites
? 
AMME9261 or AMME5200
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

Mathematics and Physics to the level of Bachelor of Science or equivalent. Linear Mathematics and Vector Calculus, Partial Differential Equations (Intro).

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Michael Groom, michael.groom@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Michael Groom, michael.groom@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Jack Geoghegan, jack.geoghegan@sydney.edu.au
Daniel Linton, daniel.linton@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Final exam (Open book) Type C final exam hurdle task Final Exam
Open book Canvas quiz (multiple choice, short & long answer questions)
30% Formal exam period 2 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment group assignment Design, Build & Test
Final report with mid-semester short reports to provide update status.
10% Multiple weeks
Due date: 14 Nov 2021 at 23:59
Maximum length of eight pages.
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO6 LO8
Tutorial quiz Weekly Question
Weekly Canvas quiz (multiple attempts). Students have 5 days to complete.
10% Multiple weeks One question per week
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO6
Assignment Lab Report: Flow Around a Cylinder and Aerofoil
Report. The assignment should take an average student 10 hours to complete.
10% Week 04
Due date: 05 Sep 2021 at 23:59
Maximum length of six pages.
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO8
Assignment Assignment 1: 2D Potential Flow
Report. The assignment should take an average student 30 hours to complete.
20% Week 06
Due date: 19 Sep 2021 at 23:59
Maximum length of ten pages.
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO9 LO6 LO2
Assignment Assignment 2: 3D Potential Flow
Report. The assignment should take an average student 30 hours to complete.
20% Week 11
Due date: 31 Oct 2021 at 23:59
Maximum length of ten pages.
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO9 LO6 LO5 LO3
hurdle task = hurdle task ?
group assignment = group assignment ?
Type C final exam = Type C final exam ?

Assessment summary

  • Assignment 1: Application of potential flow to the analysis of 2D aerofoils. 
  • Lab Report: Pressure measurement around an object. Understanding of Reynolds number effects. Analysis of aerofoil section. Stall and separation effects.
  • Assignment 2: Application of potential flow to the analysis of 3D wings.
  • Design, Build & Test: Design an aerofoil, build, pressure tap and test. Peer assessment will be used to determine each student’s final mark.
  • Weekly Question: Online question to complete each week based on the content of that week’s lectures and tutorial.
  • Final Exam: Open-book exam on content from lectures and tutorials.

 

 

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The penalty for lateness is 5% per day. The penalty would apply from the next calendar day after the deadline. The penalty is a percentage of the available mark and is applied to the mark gained after the submitted work is marked (e.g., an assignment worth 100 marks is 1 day late. The content is given a mark of 75. With the 5% penalty, the final mark is 70).

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Multiple weeks Independent study outside of contact hours to prepare for classes and to work on assignments Independent study (90 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8
Week 01 1. Introduction; 2. Review of prior concepts; 3. Lift, drag, pitching moment, wing and section geometry; 4. Nondimensional coefficients and numbers Lecture (3 hr) LO4
Week 02 1. Ideal potential flow; 2. Complex velocity, circulation and lift; 3. Two and three dimensional flows Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO4
Week 03 1. Lifting flat-plate solutions; 2. Thin aerofoil theory Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO6 LO9
Week 04 1. Boundary layer theory; 2. Pressure and friction drag Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO6
Week 05 1. Panel method solutions for aerofoil sections; 2. Viscous/Inviscid interaction techniques Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO6
Week 06 1. Aerofoil classes, laminar flow, supercritical; 2. Typical properties; 3. High lift devices Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO6 LO7
Week 07 1. Wind tunnel; 2. Measurement correction techniques Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO8
Week 08 1. Three-dimensional ideal flow; 2. Lifting line theory Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 09 Vortex lattice methods Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO7 LO9
Week 10 Low aspect ratio wing solutions Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO6
Week 11 1. Effects of compressibility; 2. Critical Mach number Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO5 LO7
Week 12 1. Wing properties; 2. Wing Fuselage interactions; 3. Downwash effects Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO6 LO7
Week 13 Revision Lecture and tutorial (5 hr) LO6

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library eReserve, available on Canvas.

  • Houghton, E.L. and Carpenter P.W. – Aerodynamics for Engineering Students. Elsevier, 2003. 978-0-7506-5111-0
  • Bertin J.J – Aerodynamics for Engineers. Prentice-Hall, 2002. 0-13-064633-4
  • Kuethe A.M. and Chow C-Y – Foundations of Aerodynamics. Wiley (New York), 1998. 0-471-12919-4
  • Anderson, J.D. Jr – Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. McGraw-Hill (Boston), 2001.
  • Abbott I.H. and Von Doenhoff A.E. – Theory of Wing Sections. Dpver (New York), 1959. 0-486-60586-8

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. construct simple computer algorithms that will allow more complex geometries to be solved
  • LO2. write an engineering report on an experimental test
  • LO3. work effectively in a team to complete an experimental project
  • LO4. apply solutions to problems under standard aerospace legislation requirements
  • LO5. understand the limitations of theory and the effect of second-order parameters (Reynolds number, Mach Number) on the primary fluid flow properties
  • LO6. predict flow properties for general aircraft wing sections to obtain lift, drag and pitching moment
  • LO7. extrapolate two-dimensional section results to predict full three-dimensional wing behaviour
  • LO8. undertake experiments and analyse data to verify theoretical predictions
  • LO9. demonstrate an improved understanding of the use of software packages to solve fluid flow problems

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

Alignment with Competency standards

Outcomes Competency standards
LO1
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
1.1. Developing underpinning capabilities in mathematics, physical, life and information sciences and engineering sciences, as appropriate to the designated field of practice.
1.2. Tackling technically challenging problems from first principles.
2.2. Application of enabling skills and knowledge to problem solution in these technical domains.
LO2
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
3.1. An ability to communicate with the engineering team and the community at large.
3.2. Information literacy and the ability to manage information and documentation.
LO3
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
3.6. An ability to function as an individual and as a team leader and member in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams.
4.4. Skills in implementing and managing engineering projects within the bounds of time, budget, performance and quality assurance requirements.
5.6. Skills in the design and conduct of experiments and measurements.
5.7. Proficiency in appropriate laboratory procedures; the use of test rigs, instrumentation and test equipment.
5.8. Skills in recognising unsuccessful outcomes, sources of error, diagnosis, fault-finding and re-engineering.
5.9. Skills in documenting results, analysing credibility of outcomes, critical reflection, developing robust conclusions, reporting outcomes.
LO4
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
4.1. Advanced level skills in the structured solution of complex and often ill defined problems.
4.5. An ability to undertake problem solving, design and project work within a broad contextual framework accommodating social, cultural, ethical, legal, political, economic and environmental responsibilities as well as within the principles of sustainable development and health and safety imperatives.
LO5
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
1.2. Tackling technically challenging problems from first principles.
2.1. Appropriate range and depth of learning in the technical domains comprising the field of practice informed by national and international benchmarks.
5.1. An appreciation of the scientific method, the need for rigour and a sound theoretical basis.
5.5. Skills in the development and application of mathematical, physical and conceptual models, understanding of applicability and shortcomings.
LO6
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
1.1. Developing underpinning capabilities in mathematics, physical, life and information sciences and engineering sciences, as appropriate to the designated field of practice.
1.2. Tackling technically challenging problems from first principles.
5.1. An appreciation of the scientific method, the need for rigour and a sound theoretical basis.
LO7
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
1.1. Developing underpinning capabilities in mathematics, physical, life and information sciences and engineering sciences, as appropriate to the designated field of practice.
1.2. Tackling technically challenging problems from first principles.
2.1. Appropriate range and depth of learning in the technical domains comprising the field of practice informed by national and international benchmarks.
2.2. Application of enabling skills and knowledge to problem solution in these technical domains.
LO8
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
5.6. Skills in the design and conduct of experiments and measurements.
5.7. Proficiency in appropriate laboratory procedures; the use of test rigs, instrumentation and test equipment.
LO9
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
5.4. Skills in the selection and application of appropriate engineering resources tools and techniques, appreciation of accuracy and limitations;.
5.5. Skills in the development and application of mathematical, physical and conceptual models, understanding of applicability and shortcomings.
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators -
Competency code Taught, Practiced or Assessed Competency standard
1.1 P A T Developing underpinning capabilities in mathematics, physical, life and information sciences and engineering sciences, as appropriate to the designated field of practice.
1.2 P A T Tackling technically challenging problems from first principles.
2.1 T P A Appropriate range and depth of learning in the technical domains comprising the field of practice informed by national and international benchmarks.
2.2 T P A Application of enabling skills and knowledge to problem solution in these technical domains.
3.1 P A An ability to communicate with the engineering team and the community at large.
3.2 P A Information literacy and the ability to manage information and documentation.
3.6 P A An ability to function as an individual and as a team leader and member in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams.
4.1 P A Advanced level skills in the structured solution of complex and often ill defined problems.
4.4 P Skills in implementing and managing engineering projects within the bounds of time, budget, performance and quality assurance requirements.
4.5 P A An ability to undertake problem solving, design and project work within a broad contextual framework accommodating social, cultural, ethical, legal, political, economic and environmental responsibilities as well as within the principles of sustainable development and health and safety imperatives.
5.1 P A T An appreciation of the scientific method, the need for rigour and a sound theoretical basis.
5.4 T P A Skills in the selection and application of appropriate engineering resources tools and techniques, appreciation of accuracy and limitations;.
5.5 T P A Skills in the development and application of mathematical, physical and conceptual models, understanding of applicability and shortcomings.
5.6 T P A Skills in the design and conduct of experiments and measurements.
5.7 P Proficiency in appropriate laboratory procedures; the use of test rigs, instrumentation and test equipment.
5.8 T P A Skills in recognising unsuccessful outcomes, sources of error, diagnosis, fault-finding and re-engineering.
5.9 T P A Skills in documenting results, analysing credibility of outcomes, critical reflection, developing robust conclusions, reporting outcomes.

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

DBT was well received. Other assessments were found to be well balanced. Weekly questions found to be useful.

There may be statistically defensible moderation when combining the marks from each component to ensure consistency of marking between markers, and alignment of final grades with unit outcomes.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.