Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ANHS3638: Humans and Other Animals in Antiquity

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

What makes us human? What (if anything) separates us from other animals? This unit explores how ancient thinkers, such as Homer, Herodotus, Plutarch, Aelian and Pliny, have drawn on the category of the animal to define human identities. A particular focus will be on storytelling as a means of thinking the human in new ways. The ancient evidence is read alongside modern interventions into a conversation that started in antiquity but that continues on to this day. It engages with the idea of the human as part of a radically separate order of being defined by reason (logos) and offers both an appreciation and critique of the tradition which uses the human as 'the measure of all things'.

Unit details and rules

Unit code ANHS3638
Academic unit Classics and Ancient History
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in the Ancient History major
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Julia Kindt, julia.kindt@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Julia Kindt, julia.kindt@sydney.edu.au
Louise Pryke, louise.pryke@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Take-home exercise
See Canvas for details.
30% Week 08
Due date: 14 Apr 2022 at 17:00
1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Research Essay
See Canvas for details.
40% Week 13
Due date: 27 May 2022 at 17:00
2500 words (plus/minus 10%)
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Online task Participation
See Canvas for details.
10% Weekly Ongoing
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Online Reading Journal
See Canvas for details.
20% Weekly ca. 200 words per week
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

Assessment summary

All students must submit an attempt at both the research essay and the take home exercise. Failure to do so will result in a fail. 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work of exceptional standard. 

Demonstrates exceptional proficiency in the translation of the Classical Greek or Latin of the prescribed texts into English with unfailing precision and accuracy

Shows a profound knowledge and understanding of the content and the cultural and historical background of the prescribed texts

Demonstrates an exceptionally deep understanding and appreciation of the literary qualities and stylistic features of the literature being studied

Shows a complete mastery of grammatical forms and demonstrates a precise understanding of their functions

Presents a precise and accurate translation into English of unprepared passages of Classical Greek or Latin prose and verse, perfectly reproducing the meaning and tone of the original.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work of a superior standard. 

Demonstrates a superior ability to translate the Classical Greek or Latin of the prescribed texts into English in a manner which closely reflects the meaning and tone of the original

Shows extensive knowledge and understanding of the content and the cultural and historical background of the prescribed texts

Demonstrates a thorough understanding and an appreciation of the literary qualities and stylistic features of the literature being studied

Shows a thorough control of grammatical forms and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of their functions

Presents an accurate translation into English of unprepared passages of Classical Greek or Latin prose and verse, reflecting the meaning and tone of the original.

Credit

65 - 74

High Credit (70-74%)

Highly competent work, demonstrating clear capacity to complete Honours successfully. 

Demonstrates an ability to translate the Classical Greek or Latin of the prescribed texts into English in a manner which reflects the meaning and tone of the original with accuracy

Shows knowledge and understanding of the content and the cultural and historical background of the prescribed texts

Demonstrates a good understanding of the literary qualities and stylistic features of the literature being studied

Recognises all grammatical forms and demonstrates a thorough understanding of their function

Presents a generally accurate translation into English of unprepared passages of Classical Greek or Latin prose and verse conveying the overall sense of the original.

Low Credit  (65-69%)

 

Competent work of considerable merit, demonstrating potential to complete Honours work, though further development needed to do so successfully.

Demonstrates an ability to translate the Classical Greek or Latin of the prescribed texts into English in a manner which reflects the meaning and tone of the original with accuracy

Shows knowledge and understanding of the content and the cultural and historical background of the prescribed texts

Demonstrates a good understanding of the literary qualities and stylistic features of the literature being studied

Recognises all grammatical forms and demonstrates a thorough understanding of their function

Presents a generally accurate translation into English of unprepared passages of Classical Greek or Latin prose and verse conveying the overall sense of the original.

Pass

50 - 64

High Pass (60-64%)

Competent work, though Honours is not recommended.

Demonstrates an ability to translate much of the Classical Greek or Latin of the prescribed texts with some accuracy reflecting a basic understanding of the context and intention of the original

Shows a basic understanding of the content of the prescribed texts

Demonstrates some general knowledge of literary forms and an awareness of the stylistic features of the literature being studied

Recognises most grammatical forms and demonstrates a sound understanding of their function

Presents a translation into English of unprepared passages of Classical Greek or Latin prose and verse, which shows an understanding of much of the passage being read, but not the passage as a whole.

 

Medium Pass (55-59%)

Work of a satisfactory standard.

Demonstrates the ability to translate parts of the Classical Greek or Latin of the prescribed texts

Shows understanding of much of the content of the prescribed texts

Recognises and comments at a basic level on some literary and stylistic features of the literature being studied

Recognises many grammatical forms and demonstrates a basic understanding of their function

Presents a translation into English of unprepared passages of Classical Greek or Latin prose and verse which manages to make sense of some contents even if it shows little understanding of the passage as a whole.

 

 

Low Pass (50-54%)

Work of an acceptable standard.

Demonstrates a limited ability to translate parts of the Classical Greek or Latin of the prescribed texts

Shows some understanding of the content of the prescribed texts

Demonstrates a partial awareness of literary features of the literature being studied

Recognises some grammatical forms

demonstrates knowledge of a number of words in an unprepared passages of Classical Greek or Latin prose and verse and some awareness of their syntactic relations

Fail

0 - 49

 

Fail (Below 50%)

Work not of an acceptable standard.

Demonstrates very limited ability to translate parts of the Classical Greek or Latin of the prescribed texts

Shows little or no understanding of the content of the prescribed texts

Demonstrates little awareness of literary features of the literature being studied

Recognises few grammatical forms

Recognises only a few words in unprepared passages of Classical Greek or Latin prose and verse and a very limited capacity to identify their syntactic relations

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 The Question of the Human & the Question of the Animal Lecture (1 hr)  
Week 02 Philosophers, Storytellers, and Philosophers as Storytellers Lecture (1 hr)  
Week 03 The Cleverness of Animals Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 04 The Perils of Logos and the Speaking Animal Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 05 Do Animals Participate in Justice? Should they? Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 06 Meat Eating and Vegetarianism Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 07 Social and Political Animals Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 09 The Human and Animal at War Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 10 Hybridity & Monstrosity Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 11 Animal Companions Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 12 Human Bodies & Animal Bodies Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 13 Conclusion: Humans, Animals, and the Environment Lecture and tutorial (1 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

Minimum and desired ttendance policies of SOPHI apply. 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

See the Canvas site and course reader.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Demonstrate a confident and extensive knowledge of the society, culture, and politics of ancient Greece and Rome.
  • LO2. Read, evaluate, and interpret the diverse body of evidence available for the study of the ancient world, such a literature - poetry, epic, drama, oratory, philosophical, religious, and scientific texts - as well as inscriptions, coins, papyri, artworks, and architecture.
  • LO3. Evaluate these different types of evidence individually and in combination with each other, using a range of discipline-appropriate concepts and methodologies in the service of integrated historical and cultural analysis.
  • LO4. Demonstrate the ability to interpret ancient sources, both textual and material ,and an understanding of how they provide insight into the history and culture of the Ancient Greek and Roman worlds.
  • LO5. Examine and solve complex historical problems through research and critical analysis, with the confidence to work both independently and collaboratively.
  • LO6. Demonstrate an understandign of, and appreciation for, difference and diversity.
  • LO7. Apply the theories and methods of other disciplines to their own work, and utilise the skills and knowledge of ancient historians to address issues encountered in an interdisciplinary context.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time we are running this unit.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.