Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ANTH3615: Ethnography of Southeast Asia

Semester 1, 2023 [Normal day] - Remote

Southeast Asia is a region of great geographic and cultural diversity, a meeting point for civilisational influences from India and China including the religions of Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism. It is also the laboratory for much anthropological inquiry, attracting the attention of prominent anthropologists and social scientists, including Clifford Geertz and Benedict Anderson. This unit will examine Southeast Asia in historical and contemporary context, and draw on ethnographies dealing with issues such as nationalism, ethnic minorities and the nation state, gender and modernity, drugs and development, and the rural-urban divide.

Unit details and rules

Unit code ANTH3615
Academic unit Anthropology
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in Anthropology
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Anjalee Cohen, anjalee.cohen@sydney.edu.au
Guest lecturer(s) Paul-David Lutz, paul-david.lutz@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Short Essay
Essay
30% Week 06
Due date: 31 Mar 2023 at 00:00
1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment Major Essay
Essay
50% Week 13
Due date: 26 May 2023 at 00:00
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Online task Weekly Reading Response
Written response to weekly seminar questions posted on Canvas
20% Weekly 150 words x 10 wks (Wk 2-12 except wk 9)
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Weekly Reading Response

From Week 2–12 (excluding Week 9 due to public holiday) students will be required to submit a written response to one of two set seminar questions posted on Canvas of no more than 150 words. You must submit your response online through Canvas by 11.59pm  every Monday prior to Tuesday classes. Students are expected to read the two set required readings for each week, review the set questions and be prepared to discuss them in class. Each response will be given a mark out of 2.

Short Essay

A short essay question will be posted on Canvas in Week 1. The aim of this 1500 word (10% + leeway) essay is for you to demonstrate that you have understood and critically reflected on the unit readings from Weeks 2-5. Students must draw primarily from the required readings (minimum of two) in E-Reserve on Canvas to answer the question. You may use additional readings listed on Canvas in support of the required readings. 

Major Essay

In Week 12 you will be given a choice of four questions for a major essay. In this 3000 word essay you will be given the opportunity to focus on one particular topic of interest from weeks 5 -12. In order to perform well in this assessment, students will need to keep up with the unit readings and regularly attend classes. Students should primarily draw on both the required and additional readings listed on Canvas to answer the question. You are also encouraged to do some independent research and draw on a limited number of external scholarly sources to support your discussion. There is a 10%-/+ leeway on the word limit. Words that exceed the limit will be penalised.

Assessment criteria

Interpretation of Grades

This Guide indicates broadly the qualitative judgements implied by the various grades which may be awarded. A more precise evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of individual essays will be provided in examiners'''''''''''''''' comments. Evaluation is made with due consideration of the different standards likely to be achieved by Junior and Senior students.

Fail (Below 50%)

Work not of an acceptable standard.

Work may fail for any or all of the following reasons: unacceptable levels of paraphrasing; irrelevance of content; presentation, grammar or structure so sloppy it cannot be understood; submitted very late without extension.

Low Pass (50-54%)

Work of an acceptable standard.

Written work contains evidence of minimal reading and some understanding of subject matter, offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question, but may have a tendency to paraphrase; makes a reasonable attempt to organise material logically and comprehensibly and to provide scholarly documentation. There may be gaps in any or all of these areas.

Medium Pass (55-59%)

Work of a satisfactory standard.

Written work meets basic requirements in terms of reading and research, and demonstrates a reasonable understanding of subject matter. Offers a synthesis of relevant material and shows a genuine effort to avoid paraphrasing, has a logical and comprehensible structure and acceptable documentation, and attempts to mount an argument, though there may be weaknesses in particular areas.

High Pass (60-64%)

Work has considerable merit, though Honours is not automatically recommended.

Written work contains evidence of a broad and reasonably accurate command of the subject matter and some sense of its broader significance, offers synthesis and some evaluation of material, demonstrates an effort to go beyond the essential reading, contains clear focus on the principal issues, understanding of relevant arguments and diverse interpretations, and a coherent argument grounded in relevant evidence, though there may be some weaknesses of clarity or structure. Articulate, properly documented.

Note that roughly 45-50% of students in junior levels of study and 25-50% of students in senior level units of study will receive marks within the Pass range each semester.

Low Credit (65-69%)

Competent work, demonstrating potential to complete Honours work, though further development needed to do so successfully.

Written work contains evidence of comprehensive reading, offers synthesis and critical evaluation of material on its own terms, takes a position in relation to various interpretations. In addition, it shows some extra spark of insight or analysis. Demonstrates understanding of broad historical significance, good selection of evidence, coherent and sustainable argument, some evidence of independent thought.

High Credit (70-74%)

Highly competent work, demonstrating clear capacity to complete Honours successfully.

Evidence of extensive reading and initiative in research, sound grasp of subject matter and appreciation of key issues and context. Engages critically and creatively with the question, and attempts an analytical evaluation of material. Makes a good attempt to critique various interpretations, and offers a pointed and thoughtful contribution to an existing debate. Some evidence of ability to think theoretically as well as empirically, and to conceptualise and problematise issues. Well written and documented.

Distinction (75-84%)

Work of a superior standard.

Written work demonstrates initiative in research and reading, complex understanding and original analysis of subject matter and its context, both empirical and theoretical; makes good attempt to ‘get behind’ the evidence and engage with its underlying assumptions, takes a critical, interrogative stance in relation to argument and interpretation, shows critical understanding of the principles and values underlying the unit. Properly documented; writing characterised by style, clarity, and some creativity.

High Distinction (85%+)

Work of exceptional standard.

Written work demonstrates initiative and ingenuity in research and reading, pointed and critical analysis of material, innovative interpretation of evidence, makes an insightful contribution to debate, engages with values, assumptions and contested meanings contained within original evidence, develops abstract or theoretical arguments on the strength of detailed research and interpretation. Properly documented; writing characterised by creativity, style, and precision.

 

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to Southeast Asia Seminar (2 hr) LO1
Week 02 Nationalism and the Nation-State Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 03 Ethnic Minorities and the State 1 Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 Ethnic Minorities and the State 2 Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 05 Mobility, Migration, Resettlement Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 06 The Rural/Urban Divide Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 07 Traditional and Modern Healing Systems 1 Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 08 Traditional and Modern Healing Systems 2 Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 ANZAC Day Public Holiday - no seminar Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 10 Drugs and Development Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 11 Gender and Power Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 12 Gender and Modernity Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 13 Ethnographic Film Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Recommended background reading on Southeast Asia

Barker, J., Harms, E. & Lindquist, J., 2014. Figures of Southeast Asian Modernity, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

King, Victor T. and William D. Wilder. 2003. ‘South-East Asia: A Field of Anthropological Enquiry?’ In the Modern Anthropology of South-East Asia: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge Curzon. Ch. 1, pp1-24.

Osborne, M. 1990. ‘What is Southeast Asia?” In Southeast Asia: An illustrated Introductory History. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

Ricklefs, M.C., Lockhart, B., Lau, A. Reyes, P and M. Aung-Thwin (ed). 2010. A New History of Southeast Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

 

Weekly required and additional readings will be listed and available through the unit E-Reserve on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. understand why southeast Asia is treated as a geographic subfield within anthropology including both the strengths and the limitations of regional specialisation
  • LO2. identify a scholar's claims with respect to the body of ethnographic and other scholarly literature on this region
  • LO3. apply general theories of culture, society and historical formation of social systems to particular problems of interpretation that emerge within a specific geographic setting and among a group of cultures related by common history and environmental factors
  • LO4. undertake independent library research to make use of the concepts and the research findings of scholars to support and develop their own ideas

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Few changes have been made since this unit was last offered due to positive feedback on last USS survey.

More information related to this unit will be provided in class.

Additional costs

There are no additional costs for this unit.

Site visit guidelines

There are no site visit guidelines for this unit.

Work, health and safety

There are no specific WHS requirements for this unit.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.