Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ANTH3700: Practicing Anthropology

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

Anthropology is known for its distinctive method of long-term field work and participant observation engagement with the peoples it studies. This unit will teach students how anthropological methods inform anthropological concepts and broader social theories and how anthropological fieldwork, research and writing contributes to contemporary social debates and reveals new ways of seeing the world that can help to change it for the better. It shows how to put anthropology into practice in all facets of research, writing and public engagement.

Unit details and rules

Unit code ANTH3700
Academic unit Anthropology
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in the Anthropology major
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Anjalee Cohen, anjalee.cohen@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Anjalee Cohen, anjalee.cohen@sydney.edu.au
Paul-David Lutz, paul-david.lutz@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Ethnographic Paper
Develop an ethnographically-grounded claim based on your research findings
45% Formal exam period
Due date: 26 Nov 2021 at 23:59
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Assignment Reading Responses
Written response to required reading
30% Multiple weeks 150 words x 10 = 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Assignment Research Proposal
Write a research proposal based on a topic of concern/interest
15% Week 06
Due date: 17 Sep 2021 at 23:59
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO2
Assignment Fieldwork Reflections/Write-up Plan
Write an outline of how you intend to analyse your research data
10% Week 09
Due date: 15 Oct 2021 at 23:59
500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO2

Assessment summary

 

Reading Responses

In selected weeks, you will be required to submit a response to ONE of the set questions on Canvas of no more than 150 words (mark out of 3). Students must submit their response online through Canvas by 11.59pm (before midnight) the day prior to seminar. Everyone should have read the two set required readings for each week, considered ALL the set questions and be prepared to discuss them in the tutorial.

Ethnographic Research Project

Select a location/setting to which you have good access, and that is ethically unproblematic. Conduct participant observation and interview/s in this location. Take detailed fieldnotes; record your observations (including your own positionality and how this affects your data). Based on the above, draw up a write-up plan, to be discussed in seminar. Identify a theme/s that succinctly captures your observations/data. Do not only summarize your experience, but build a bridge between the participant/s emic perspective/s and your etic description which a non-anthropologist would be able to grasp. Develop an ethnographically-grounded claim based on your findings. This project is divided into three asessements:

  1. Research Proposal

Draft a research proposal, based on a topic/issue of concern you would like to know more about. Include a research question, background, aims, and methodology. Consider feasibility and human ethics.

  1. Fieldwork Reflections/Write-Up Plan

Immediately following your research project write a brief outline of how you intend to analyse your data. You may also include a reflection/issue/problem arising from your field research (e.g. reflections on positionality, or adjusting the research focus in accordance with realities in “the field”).

  1. Ethnographic Paper

Write an essay grounded in your fieldwork data and analysis. Identify a theme/s that succinctly captures your observations/data. Do not only summarise your experience, but build a bridge between the participant/s emic perspective/s and your etic description which a non-anthropologist would be able to grasp. Develop an ethnographically-grounded claim based on your findings.

 

Assessment criteria

Interpretation of Grades

This Guide indicates broadly the qualitative judgements implied by the various grades which may be awarded. A more precise evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of individual essays will be provided in the markers’ comments. Evaluation is made with due consideration of the different standards likely to be achieved by Junior and Senior students.

Fail (Below 50%)

Description

Work not of an acceptable standard.

Work may fail for any or all of the following reasons: unacceptable levels of paraphrasing; irrelevance of content; presentation, grammar or structure so sloppy it cannot be understood; submitted very late without extension.

Low Pass (50-54%)

Work of an acceptable standard.

Written work contains evidence of minimal reading and some understanding of subject matter, offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question, but may have a tendency to paraphrase; makes a reasonable attempt to organise material logically and comprehensibly and to provide scholarly documentation. There may be gaps in any or all of these areas.

Medium Pass (55-59%)

Work of a satisfactory standard.

Written work meets basic requirements in terms of reading and research, and demonstrates a reasonable understanding of subject matter. Offers a synthesis of relevant material and shows a genuine effort to avoid paraphrasing, has a logical and comprehensible structure and acceptable documentation, and attempts to mount an argument, though there may be weaknesses in particular areas.

High Pass (60-64%)

Work has considerable merit, though Honours is not automatically recommended.

Written work contains evidence of a broad and reasonably accurate command of the subject matter and some sense of its broader significance, offers synthesis and some evaluation of material, demonstrates an effort to go beyond the essential reading, contains clear focus on the principal issues, understanding of relevant arguments and diverse interpretations, and a coherent argument grounded in relevant evidence, though there may be some weaknesses of clarity or structure. Articulate, properly documented.

Note that roughly 45-50% of students in junior levels of study and 25-50% of students in senior level units of study will receive marks within the Pass range each semester.

Low Credit (65-69%)

Competent work, demonstrating potential to complete Honours work, though further development needed to do so successfully.

Written work contains evidence of comprehensive reading, offers synthesis and critical evaluation of material on its own terms, takes a position in relation to various interpretations. In addition, it shows some extra spark of insight or analysis. Demonstrates understanding of broad historical significance, good selection of evidence, coherent and sustainable argument, some evidence of independent thought.

High Credit (70-74%)

Highly competent work, demonstrating clear capacity to complete Honours successfully.

Evidence of extensive reading and initiative in research, sound grasp of subject matter and appreciation of key issues and context. Engages critically and creatively with the question, and attempts an analytical evaluation of material. Makes a good attempt to critique various interpretations, and offers a pointed and thoughtful contribution to an existing debate. Some evidence of ability to think theoretically as well as empirically, and to conceptualise and problematise issues. Well written and documented.

Distinction (75-84%)

Work of a superior standard.

Written work demonstrates initiative in research and reading, complex understanding and original analysis of subject matter and its context, both empirical and theoretical; makes good attempt to ‘get behind’ the evidence and engage with its underlying assumptions, takes a critical, interrogative stance in relation to argument and interpretation, shows critical understanding of the principles and values underlying the unit. Properly documented; writing characterised by style, clarity, and some creativity.

High Distinction (85%+)

Work of exceptional standard.

Written work demonstrates initiative and ingenuity in research and reading, pointed and critical analysis of material, innovative interpretation of evidence, makes an insightful contribution to debate, engages with values, assumptions and contested meanings contained within original evidence, develops abstract or theoretical arguments on the strength of detailed research and interpretation. Properly documented; writing characterised by creativity, style, and precision.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Unit Introduction Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 02 Ethnography Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 03 Developing a Research Project Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 In-depth Interviews Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Week 05 The Process of Analysis Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 06 Getting There Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Week 07 Being There Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 08 Ethics in the Field Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 Projects Week Individual study (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 Data Analysis Techniques Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5
Week 11 Coming Back and Writing Up Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 12 Applying and Practicing Anthropology Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 13 Anthropology and Activism Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Appreciate the central role and distinctive value of ethnographic fieldwork in the practice of anthropology and generation of new knowledge
  • LO2. Understand and critically reflect on how socio-economic, cultural, historical and political contexts shape the practice of ethnographic fieldwork in different settings, and develop an appreciation of personal, inter-personal and ethical dynamics in anthropological research
  • LO3. Understand and reflect on the role and contribution anthropologists make in both the public, private and non-governmental sectors, and how these engagements shape both anthropology and society at large
  • LO4. Gain first-hand practical experience in designing, conducting, processing and writing-up ethnographic research
  • LO5. Learn how to use and analyse real-world data to identify themes and develop an ethnographically-grounded argument

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time this unit has been offered

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.