Outline

Overview

Critical Thinking in Architecture introduces students to the important role of criticality in architecture. Impelled by a series of lectures and seminal readings, students study the relationship between architectural design and architectural theory. They become familiar with key contemporary movements, ideas and protagonists, and come to understand the ways in which ideas that emerged in other areas of culture have been absorbed into architectural discourse. They become conversant with the underlying principles and foundational skills of scholarly research, including locating and critically evaluating sources, constructing arguments, and communicating ideas using graphic, spoken and written means of expression. Through exploration of the characteristics and concerns of differing written media, including books, articles, reports and essays, they recognise writing as a practice that is in part conditioned by every author's own circumstances and interests, opening up questions of objectivity and judgement. By critiquing contemporary architectural discourse in light of its historical, political, aesthetic, ethical and cultural circumstances, students develop capacities that make them capable of both understanding and challenging prevailing positions and practices in architecture.

Unit details and rules

Unit code	ARCH4007
Academic unit	Architecture
Credit points	6
Prohibitions ?	None
Prerequisites ?	BDES2028
Corequisites ?	None
Assumed knowledge ?	None
Available to study abroad and exchange students	No

Teaching staff

Coordinator	Chris L. L Smith, chris.l.smith@sydney.edu.au

Type	Description	Weight	Due	Length
Presentation	Seminar presentation Presentation	20%	Week 05	10 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Critical visual essay Written assessment	70%	Week 12	800-600 words
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	#2022ARCH4007 assessment Participation	10%	Week 13	10 images
Outcomes assessed:

Assessment summary

Seminar presentation: Each student is to produce written text (fully referenced) and 4 images describing their allocated concept which they will present as a seminar. Each student will produce 4 images that must complement or supplement their written text in exploration of the allocated concept. The images might be diagrams, annotated text, photographic, ephemeral etc. and must be high resolution at a maximum of A4 in dimension.
Draft essay: The draft essay is an optional submission which gives students an opportunity to receive feedback about their developing visual essay submission. The draft should be referenced and describe both the concept and its relation to architecture. Each student must firstly have selected a piece of architecture (and an aspect of that architecture) to explore. This must be confirmed with your tutor (ideally by week 4).
Critical visual essay: Each student is to produce an illustrated and fully referenced visual essay focussed upon the relation between their allocated concept and architecture. The final essays must be submitted in PDF form via Turn-it-in and Canvas as a Microsoft word doc. No exceptions. The critical visual essay should be saved at high resolution.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name	Mark range	Description
High distinction	85 - 100	Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or exceptional skill.
Distinction	75 - 84	Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.
Credit	65 - 74	Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed, or work of excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes assessed.
Pass	50 - 64	Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed.
Fail	0 - 49	Work that does not demonstrate satisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning outcomes assessed.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Learning support

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Weekly schedule

WK	Topic	Learning activity
Week 01	01 Prologue	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 01	1. Introductions; 2. Allocation of concepts; 3. Discussion of processes/expectations	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 02	02 Lying Figures	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 02	Exploring concepts: identifying key sources	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 03	03 Earth and Territory	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 03	Exploring concepts: key characteristics of concepts	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 04	04 The Impersonal	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 04	1. Architecture choices for visual essay; 2. Architecture analytics in graphic form	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 05	05 The Indiscerbible	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 06	06 The Indiscernible	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 07	07 The Imperceptible	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 07	Essay text: narrative and logics	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 08	08 Bodies without Organs	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 08	Essay writing: structure and tone	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 09	09 Sex and flowers	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 09	Essay writing: referencing	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 10	10 Symptomatology	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 10	Essay writing: editing	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 11	11 Wayfaring	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 11	Visual essay surgery sessions	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 12	12 Speaking	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 12	Visual sssay surgery sessions	Tutorial (1 hr)
Week 13	13 Postscript	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 13	Feedback session	Tutorial (1 hr)

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance:

The School’s requirement of 90% in person attendance is waived. Participation in this unit is required via online components.

Attendance at all scheduled lecture and tutorial sessions is mandatory, except in the case of illness or misadventure, in accordance with the School’s attendance policy. Attendance means arriving at the time required and staying until teaching ends. Attendance and contribution to class discussion will be monitored and may be factored into allocated grades. Announcements made at lectures are deemed to be made to the whole group.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

The following texts may provide a helpful grounding (and a few are available online via Sci-Tech library):

Andrew Ballantyne, Deleuze and Guattari for Architects, (London: Routledge, 2007).
Andrew Ballantyne and Chris L. Smith, eds, Architecture in the Space of Flows (London: Routledge, 2012).
Gordana Fontana-Giusti, Foucault for Architects, (London: Routledge, 2013).
Elizabeth Grosz, Architecture from the Outside, (Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 2001).
McCorquodale, Reudi and Wigglesworth, Desiring Practices, (London: Black Dog Publications, 1996).
Stephen Loo and Hélène Frichot eds. Deleuze and Architecture, (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013).
John Rajchman, The Deleuze Connections, (Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press, 2000).
Peg Rawes, Irigaray for Architects, (London: Routledge, 2007).
Chris L. Smith, Bare Architecture: a schizoanalysis, (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

Outcomes
Graduate qualities

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

LO1. consider, challenge, and elucidate complex ideas in a clear and concise manner using a scholarly argument and consistent referencing
LO2. integrate knowledge and methods from related disciplines into creative work
LO3. develop and apply a level of information literacy that allows for the articulation of particular contemporary theoretical standpoints, and demonstrate the ability to refine research and writing skills through independent research and critique of a particular aspect of architectural theory
LO4. inform action through knowledge of architectural design theory with particular emphasis on the specific cultural and philosophical contexts in which the theories arose, and how they were represented within the domain of architecture
LO5. think abstractly, conceptually, and critically about architecture, and through different architectural and philosophical ideas, and demonstrate the principles of particular central theories with an understanding of relevant terms and references
LO6. engage oral, written, visual, and other forms of communication to express ideas.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1	Depth of disciplinary expertise Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.
GQ2	Critical thinking and problem solving Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.
GQ3	Oral and written communication Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.
GQ4	Information and digital literacy Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.
GQ5	Inventiveness Generating novel ideas and solutions.
GQ6	Cultural competence Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.
GQ7	Interdisciplinary effectiveness Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.
GQ8	Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.
GQ9	Influence Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes	Graduate qualities
Learning outcomes

Responding to student feedback

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

As a result of feedback, the UoS is now better supported online via the refined Sydney Curriculum system.

Additional information

More information can be found on Canvas

Site visit guidelines

There are no site visit guidelines for this unit.

Work, health and safety

There are no specific WHS requirements for this unit.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.

Current students

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Required readings

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Additional information

Additional information

Site visit guidelines

Work, health and safety

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect

Current students

ARCH4007: Critical Thinking in Architecture

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Required readings

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Additional information

Additional information

Site visit guidelines

Work, health and safety

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect