Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ARCH9001: Urban Design Studio: Urban Precinct

Semester 2, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

Design studios are the heart of the urban design program. Values, knowledge and skills acquired in other units and from previous experience are supplemented and enhanced, and applied creatively to both the investigation and development phases of design projects at an urban scale. Urban Design Studio: Urban Precinct is concerned with developing design propositions that respond to the changing environmental, economic and social context of the city and that challenge 'business as usual' practice. Projects are carefully chosen to explore large complex urban areas, such as urban centres, waterfront precincts, renewal precincts, institutional campuses or major infrastructure interventions. The studio will generate proposals for major urban structures, spaces and forms which are rigourously informed by design methodologies. Inter-disciplinary group work is an essential part of the studio and integrates the broad range of backgrounds and skills of the students while mimicing the reality of practice. The central aim of this unit is to develop illustrative, writing and verbal skills which will enable students to carry out urban design projects such as the preparation of strategies, frameworks, master plans and public domain concepts in a professional and visionary manner. Students will be expected to demonstrate appropriate problem recognition, investigative, analytical, interpretative, design and presentation skills and abilities on projects of major urban scale. Assessment may also embrace abilities to prepare and interpret project briefs, program proposals and work in groups.

Unit details and rules

Unit code ARCH9001
Academic unit Urban and Regional Planning and Policy
Credit points 12
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
ARCH9100
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Deena Ridenour, deena.ridenour@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Deena Ridenour, deena.ridenour@sydney.edu.au
Ian Woodcock, ian.woodcock@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Alice Vialard, alice.vialard@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Individual design journal
Written and graphic documentation of individual design process
30% Multiple weeks
Due date: 18 Nov 2022 at 23:59
Refer to Canvas for content list
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO10 LO11 LO12 LO13
Assignment group assignment Design Proposition Presentation (Final)
Verbal and graphic presentation, in class or via Zoom; Posters
30% STUVAC
Due date: 06 Nov 2022 at 23:59
15-20 slides, 15 minutes; Posters x 2 A1
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO13 LO12 LO11 LO10 LO9 LO8 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment group assignment Opportunities and Constraints Analysis Presentation
Verbal and graphic presentation, in class or via Zoom
20% Week 05
Due date: 28 Aug 2022 at 23:59
12 pgs, A3 presentation Refer to Canvas
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Assignment group assignment Urban Structure and Town Centre Options (Mid-term)
Verbal and graphic presentation, in class or via Zoom
20% Week 08
Due date: 18 Sep 2022 at 23:59
15 slides, 15 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO11 LO13 LO10 LO9 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • Opportunties and Constraints Analysis Presentation: This assessment analyses the planning, urban, environmental and social context for the project and syntesises the findings into opportunities and constraints to guide the design process. Analysis includes the spatial attributes of the urban form, the qualities of the place and the inhabitants who live and work there.
  • Design Options Presentation (Mid-term): This assessment explores two options that responds to and tests your group rationale for your design vision and describes your key design moves that will form the master plan brief for the second part of the term. The graphic and verbal presentation will be reviewed by a guest design jury.
  • Design Proposition Presentation (Final): This assessment consolidates your group’s design proposition and presents a cohesive master plan that demonstrates how the design strategies address the vision and objectives to create a compelling alternative to current practice.  The graphic and verbal presentation will be reviewed by a guest design jury.
  • Individual design journal: Throughout the term each individual will keep a record of their weekly design thinking in a design journal.  The journal will demonstrate both contribution to the group work and individual design work. The design journal will compile scanned hand drawings, digital drawings, precedents research and reflective text to demonstrate the design development and learning process. A summary essay will compare your group proposition with business as usual. 

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or exceptional skill.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.

Credit

65 - 74

Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed, or work of excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Pass

50 - 64

Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed.

Fail

0 - 49

Work that does not demonstrate satisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning outcomes assessed.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

As per university policy.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Studio introduction Lecture (1 hr) LO2
Sharing Urbanisms Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 02 Understanding Context - Planning context and aspirations; Connecting with Country Lecture and tutorial (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 03 Interrogating Site and Precedent Research Lecture and tutorial (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO7
Week 04 Synthesising Urban Analysis and Summarising Findings Lecture and tutorial (6 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO9 LO10
Week 05 Presentation - Opportunities and Constraints; Vision and Design Objectives Tutorial Tutorial (6 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO10 LO13
Week 06 Town Centre Design from Urban Structure to Space Lecture and tutorial (6 hr) LO5 LO6 LO7 LO9 LO10
Week 07 Design Options and Evaluation Tutorial Lecture and tutorial (6 hr) LO5 LO6 LO9 LO10 LO11
Week 08 Design Options Presentation to guest jury Presentation (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO12 LO13
Week 10 Shaping urban form and Defining key design moves Lecture and tutorial (6 hr) LO6 LO7 LO10 LO11 LO13
Week 11 Designing for People; Avatar Needs Place Check Lecture and tutorial (6 hr) LO3 LO4 LO10 LO11 LO13
Week 12 Design Guidelines and Design with Country Guidelines Lecture and tutorial (6 hr) LO9 LO11 LO12
Week 13 Draft Design Proposition Presentations Lecture and tutorial (6 hr) LO1 LO4 LO6 LO7 LO10 LO11 LO12 LO13
Week 14 (STUVAC) Design Proposition Presentations to guest jury Presentation (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO10 LO11 LO12 LO13

Attendance and class requirements

Students are expected to attend a minimum of 90% of timetabled activities for each unit of study as per faculty resolution

https://sydney.edu.au/handbooks/architecture/rules/faculty_resolutions.shtml

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Refer to Canvas;

Useful references will be provided in Weekly modules

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. investigate, understand, and communicate key features and characteristics of urban settings, and summarise the opportunities and constraints to be considered for urban design proposals
  • LO2. research and critically analyse current planning policies and strategic plans to inform strategic objectives for the study area relevant to the design project
  • LO3. identify users needs from available data, background reports, and site observations
  • LO4. define strategic objectives and design principles to support a clear urban proposition for the study area
  • LO5. demonstrate a basic understanding of movement networks (private and share vehicles, public transport, pedestrian, and cycles) and associated car parking and the implications for connectivity, street design, and development density
  • LO6. demonstrate an awareness of building types and understand their role in facilitating local activity, diversity, and character
  • LO7. demonstrate the use of precedents to evaluate design ideas and to communicate design intent
  • LO8. quantify floor space, housing, and jobs projections
  • LO9. recognise the basic processes of land development, subdivision, and forms of tenure and ownership, and their implications for urban design
  • LO10. demonstrate a considered approach to the spatial definition, qualities, and uses of the public realm and its nexus with building form
  • LO11. describe and prioritise design criteria and recommendations to guide the evolution of the project over time
  • LO12. consolidate design investigations across the term, and present compelling urban design propositions using appropriate visual and verbal materials for the target audience
  • LO13. demonstrate effective contribution to group work and capacity to deliver studio outcomes through group collaboration.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Design with Country is embedded in the design process from inception. Lecture and tutorial content is refined to provide additional hand on skill development.

Additional costs

Additional costs may be incurred for travel for site visits and final presentation to Council, and in the purchase of drawing material and presentation materials.

Site visit guidelines

Information will be provided in Canvas

Work, health and safety

Information will be provided in Canvas.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.