Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ASNS2661: History of Modern Indonesia

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit examines the history of Indonesia, the world's fourth most populous country, emphasizing the interaction between Islam, nationalism and democracy. The unit traces these forces impact on the formation of modern Indonesia from the late nineteenth century, highlighting the experience and legacy of colonialism, the independence struggle, and the rise and fall of military rule. Particular attention is given to changing notions of national identity, debates about the place of Islam in the polity and authoritarianism and democratisation.

Unit details and rules

Unit code ASNS2661
Academic unit
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
12 Junior credit points in units of study listed in Table A
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Adrian Vickers, adrian.vickers@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation Tutorial participation
Contributions to tutorials via chat and discussions
10% Ongoing n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO6 LO3 LO1
Assignment Research essay
Students design their own essay topic and then research it
45% Week 12
Due date: 20 Nov 2020 at 11:58
2000 words + 500 word proposal
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4 LO3 LO5 LO6
Assignment Take-home assessment task
Mini-essays assessing knowledge of content and analysis of sources
45% Week 13 2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO6 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

*Research essay: after submitting an essay proposal of 500 words to design their own essay topic in week 7, students research and write the essay of 2,000 words.

*Take-home exam: mini-essays on topics provided, 2,000 words.

*Tutorial participation: contributions to class discussions via chat and orally.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Demonstrates a high level of understanding of content combined with strong analytical ability, especially an ability to construct original arguments from evidence.

Distinction

75 - 84

Demonstrates good understanding of content combined with good analytical ability, especially an ability to construct sound arguments from evidence.

Credit

65 - 74

Demonstrates understanding of content combined with analytical ability, especially an ability to construct arguments from evidence.

Pass

50 - 64

Demonstrates basic understanding of content and ability to construct an analytical argument. 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The Assessment Procedures 2011 provide that any written work submitted after 11:59pm on the due date will be penalised by 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date. If the assessment is submitted more than ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded. However, a unit of study may prohibit late submission or exclude late penalties only if expressly stated below.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 History, Heritage and Memory Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 02 How Indonesians Write Their History Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5 LO6
The politics of history Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO6
Week 03 Dutch colonialism in Indonesia Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO6
Understanding the Netherlands East Indies Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 04 Disaster in Indonesian history Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
The Influenza Pandemic Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Nationalism in Indonesia Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
The plural nation Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 06 From the Japanese Period to the Revolution Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Participation in the Revolution Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 07 The New Nation Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Region and state in the 1950s Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 08 Guided Democracy Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Communism in Indonesia Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 09 The Killings and the rise of the New Order Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
State and society in the 1970s Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 Islam and politics in the New Order Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Islam and the Indonesian state Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 The end of the New Order Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Conflict and transition Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 National unity in Indonesia Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Indonesia and Papua Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 13 Evaluating Indonesian history Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO6
Closing discussion Tutorial (1 hr) LO3 LO4 LO6

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

The two background texts outlining major developments in Indonesia are:

Vickers, Adrian, A History of Modern Indonesia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013) [available in electronic format through the Fisher library website]

Ricklefs, M.C., A History of Modern Indonesia (London: Macmillan, 1981 and 1993).

Week 1

Legêne, Susan and Henk Schulte Nordholt, ‘Introduction: Imagining Heritage and Heritage as Imagined History’ in Legêne, Susan et al., Sites, Bodies and Stories (Singapore: NUS Press, 2015), pp. 1-30.

Week 2

Asvi Warman Adam, ‘History, Nationalism, and Power’, in Vedi R. Hadiz and Daniel Dhakidae (eds), Social Science and Power in Indonesia, pp. 247–274 (Jakarta/Singapore, Equinox/ISEAS, 2005).

Week 3

Taylor, Jean Gelman, ‘Many Kingdoms, One Colony’, in Indonesia: Peoples and Histories (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003), pp. 238-278.

Excerpt from Max Havelaar, by Multatuli, in Tineke Hellwig and Eric Tagliacozzo (eds.), The Indonesia Reader: History, Culture and Politics, (Durham: Duke University Press, 2009), pp. 128-132.

Vickers, Adrian, ‘Chapter 1, Our colonial soil’ in A History of Modern Indonesia, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 9- 33.

Week 4

Sandick R.A. van, ‘The Eruption of Krakatoa’, in Tineke Hellwig and Eric Tagliacozzo (eds.), The Indonesia Reader: History, Culture and Politics, (Durham: Duke University Press, 2009), pp. 252–255.

Kartodirdjo, Sartono, ‘The Religious Revival’, chapter V of The Peasants’ Revolt of Banten in 1888. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1966.

Brown, Colin, “The Influenza Pandemic of 1918 in Indonesia,” in Death and Disease in Southeast Asia: Explorations in Social, Medical and Demographic History, ed. Norman G. Owen (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 235–56.

Week 5

Elson, R. E., ‘Constructing the nation: Ethnicity, race, modernity and citizenship in early Indonesian thought’, Asian Ethnicity, 6, 3, (2005), pp. 145-60.

Foulcher, Keith, ‘Sumpah Pemuda: The Making and Meaning of a Symbol of Indonesian Nationhood’, Asian Studies Review, 24, 3 (2000), pp. 377-410.

Sukarno, ‘Nationalism, Islam and Marxism (1926)’, in Herbert Feith and Lance Castles (eds.), Indonesian Political Thinking 1945-65, (Ithaca: Cornell University, 1970), pp. 357-361.

Sukarno, ‘The Pantja Sila (1945)’, in Herbert Feith and Lance Castles, eds., Indonesian Political Thinking 1945-65, (Ithaca: Cornell University, 1970), pp. 40-49;

Week 6

Anthony Reid, ‘From Briefcase to Samurai Sword’ in Alfred McCoy, Southeast Asia Under Japanese occupation, (Newhaven: Yale, 1980), pp.16-32.

Idrus, Surabaja, a translation, Benedict R. O'G. Anderson and S. U. Nababan (trans.), Indonesia, 5 (April 1968), pp.1-28.

Frederick, William H., ‘The Appearance of Revolution: Cloth, Uniform and the Pemuda Style in East Java, 1945-1949’, in Henk Schulte Nordholt (ed.), Outward Appearances (Leiden: KITLV, 1997), pp. 199-248.

Week 7

Schulte Nordholt, Henk, ‘Indonesia in the 1950s: Nation, modernity, and the post-colonial state’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 167, 4 (2011), pp. 386-404.

Lee C. ‘At The Rendezvous Of Decolonization: The Final Communique of the Asian-African Conference, Bandung, Indonesia, 18-24 April 1955’, Interventions - International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 11 (2009), pp.81-91.

Prijono, ‘Nation Building and Education (1959)’, in Herbert Feith and Lance Castles (eds.), Indonesian Political Thinking 1945-65, (Ithaca: Cornell University, 1970), pp. 327-328.

Velthoen, Esther, ‘Hutan and Kota: Contested Visions of the Nation-State in Southern Sulawesi in the 1950s’, in Hannerman Samuel and Henk Schulte Nordholt, eds., Indonesia in Transition: Rethinking ‘Civil Society’, ‘Region’, and ‘Crisis’ (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004).

Week 8

Soedjatmoko, ‘The Indonesian Historian and His Time’, in Soedjatmoko et al. (eds.), An Introduction to Indonesian Historiography, (Ithaca: Cornell University, 1965), pp. 404-415.

Alisjahbana, Sutan Takdir, ‘Sukarno – Promoter and Impediment’, in Indonesia: Social and Cultural Revolution, (1966), pp. 137-177.

Ruth McVey, ‘Teaching Modernity: The PKI as an Educational Institution’, Indonesia 50 (1990), pp. 5-28.

Week 9

Cribb, Robert, ‘Unresolved Problems in the Indonesian Killings of 1965–1966,’ Asian Survey, 41, 4 (2002), pp. 550-581.

Wanandi, Jusuf, ‘Chapter 3: the New Order’ in Shades of Grey: A Political Memoir of Modern Indonesia, (Equinox, 2012), pp. 84-90; 96-109.

David Bourchier, ‘Crime, law and state authority in Indonesia’, in Arief Budiman (ed.), State and Civil Society in Indonesia, Monash Papers on Southeast Asia no. 22 (Clayton, Vic: Monash University Press, 1990), pp. 177-212.

Lestari, ‘My Ideals for My Country’, in Putu Oka Sukanta, Breaking the Silence, (Clayton, Vic.: Monash University Press, 2014).

Week 10

Hefner, Robert W., ‘Ambivalent Alliances: Religion and Politics in the Early New Order’, Chapter 4 of Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000).

TAPOL, the Indonesia Human Rights Campaign, ‘Appendices I-IV’, in Indonesia: Muslims on Trial (London: TAPOL, 1987).

Nadirsyah Hosen, ‘Religion and the Indonesian Constitution: A Recent Debate’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 36, 3 (2005), pp. 419-440.

Week 11

Aspinall, Edward, ‘Chapter 3: The Fall of Suharto’, in Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance and Regime Change in Indonesia (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005), pp. 202-238.

Leila S. Chudori, ‘Redefining Indonesia’ The Australia-Indonesia Centre, 5 October, 2016 <http://australiaindonesiacentre.org/essay- series-redefining-indonesia-leila-s-chudori/>

Spyer, Patricia, ‘Fire without Smoke and Other Phantoms of Ambon’s Violence: Media Effects, Agency, and the Work of Imagination’, Indonesia, 74, (October 2002), pp. 21-36.

Week 12

Aspinall, Edward & Mark T. Berger, ‘The break-up of Indonesia? Nationalisms after decolonisation and the limits of the nation-state in post-cold war Southeast Asia’, Third World Quarterly, 22, 6, (2001) pp. 1003-1024.

‘Mica Barreto Soares’ in Jude Conway (ed.), Step by step: women of East Timor, stories of resistance and survival, (Darwin, N.T.: Charles Darwin University Press, 2010), pp. 124-141.

Chauvel, Richard and Ikrar Nusa Bhakti, ‘The Papua conflict: Jakarta’s perceptions and policies’, (Policy Studies 5, Washington: East- West Centre, 2005).

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Demonstrate understanding of the structures of Indonesian history
  • LO2. Demonstrate ability to evaluate primary and secondary sources
  • LO3. Show appreciation of different perspectives on Indonesia and different ways of seeing the past
  • LO4. Show ability to research, synthesise and analyse a range of sources in order to produce informed arguments
  • LO5. Evaluate digital sources in researching and communicating concepts in Indonesian history.
  • LO6. Apply ethical standards to inquiry in Indonesian history particularly relating to decolonisation.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit has been updated based on student feedback.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.