Skip to main content
Unit of study_

AVBS3888: Laboratory Disease Investigations

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The laboratory investigation of animal diseases requires an interdisciplinary approach that may involve collaboration between pathologists, microbiologists, geneticists, epidemiologists, biotechnologists, statisticians, livestock managers, ecologists, public health workers, and governmental biosecurity agencies. The ability to identify and explore interdisciplinary links is a crucial skill for emerging professionals and researchers alike. This unit presents the opportunity to bring together the concepts and skills you have learnt in your discipline and work with students from other disciplines to investigate a real-world problem. In this inquiry- based unit, students will engage in projects that engages students in a real-life animal disease-based investigation in collaboration with students from other disciplines, supervised by a range of industry-engaged academics. The focus is on developing interdisciplinary skills, an investigative approach, and critical thinking and analysis in the context of the many faces of animal disease investigation. In this unit, you will continue to understand and explore disciplinary knowledge, while also meeting and collaborating with students from across the University through project-based learning; identifying and solving problems, collecting and analysing data and communicating your findings to a diverse audience. All of these skills are highly valued by employers. This unit will foster the ability to work in interdisciplinary teams, and this is essential for both professional and research pathways in the future.

Unit details and rules

Unit code AVBS3888
Academic unit Life and Environmental Sciences Academic Operations
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
AVBS2001 and AVBS3001
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

Fundamental mechanisms of disease, basic microbiology and parasitology, basic epidemiology.

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Jan Slapeta, jan.slapeta@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Gary Muscatello, gary.muscatello@sydney.edu.au
Damien Higgins, damien.higgins@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Final exam (Record+) Type B final exam Final exam
Written exam
30% Formal exam period 1 hour
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO5
Assignment Project proposal
Project proposal
15% Week 05 650 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Assignment Reflective statement 1
Reflection on team and individuals objectives in a team
5% Week 06 350 words
Outcomes assessed: LO6
Presentation group assignment Presentation interdisciplinary
Oral presentation
10% Week 12 10-15 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment group assignment Report Interdisciplinary
Project Report
30% Week 13 3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Reflective statement 2
Reflection on interdisciplinary work
10% Week 13 500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO6
group assignment = group assignment ?
Type B final exam = Type B final exam ?

Assessment summary

Project proposal: For this assessment you will use your scenario, literature and peer discussion to identify a knowledge gap or question. You will then introduce your associated project, and justify your question and approach.

Reflective statement 1: In this statement you will reflect on past learning, including the current unit and qualities relevant to your future career.

Final presentation: Together with your group you will present orally the outcomes of your group interdisciplinary project in an online live or recorded presentation

Final report: As a group you will prepare a group report on your project, including your methods and approach, results and discussion, and supplementary material (e.g. lab book).

Reflective statement 2: In this statement you will reflect on learning in this unit and interdisciplinarity and contrast it with you refelctive statement 1 and how it benefits your future career.

Final exam: It will include questions that require problem solving; outlining an approach to a disease investigation problem or troubleshooting a method such as those involved in any of the projects conducted during the semester.  The material supporting you in your learning for these questions includes material delivered in lectures and, importantly, lab activities and discussions relating to all group projects (your active involvement in these is therefore strongly encouraged).

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Grade

Mark

Criteria

FAIL

(<50%)

The main point of the task is not answered. Content of the answer is irrelevant and fails to address the question or task. Presentation, grammar or structure is so unclear that the answer cannot be understood. Evidence of plagiarism; inadequate attendance at practical classes and lectures.

PASS

(50%-65%)

A pass grade may be awarded if the work is of an acceptable standard and the following applies: Only one aspect of the question is answered and is incomplete. It contains evidence of a rudimentary understanding of the subject matter. A reasonable attempt has been made to organise material logically and comprehensibly. The work may contain irregularities of style and expression that do not, however, interfere with meaning.

CREDIT

(65%-75%)

 

A credit grade may be awarded if the criteria for a pass grade are met in addition to the following: The work is competent and all parts are answered fully and accurately. There is evidence of additional reading. There is demonstration of good selection of evidence and critical evaluation of material. Independent thought is demonstrated. It is presented in a clear and logical style.

DISTINCTION

(75%-85%)

A distinction grade may be awarded if the work fulfills all the criteria outlined for a credit, but in addition, is of a superior standard and demonstrates the following: The student demonstrates advanced critical understanding of the principles underlying the unit of study. The work demonstrates initiative in research and reading.

HIGH DISTINCTION

(85%-100%)

 

A high distinction grade may be awarded if the work fulfills all the criteria outlined for a distinction, but in addition is of exceptional quality and demonstrates outstanding critical understanding of the principles underlying the unit of study.

These grade descriptors have general applicability. Specific assessment tasFor more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.ks may have specific variations of these grade descriptors

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Weekly Weekly online lectures covering case studies, and disease investigation methods and investigative approaches Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Weekly workshops/ tutorials in your interdisciplinary groups to plan projects, present progress to peers and receive feedback, and gain exposure to other group's projects and learning experience. Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Weekly practical activities covering all aspects of investigation including: literature searching, collaborative project design, exercises on laboratory method validation and optimization, project execution, and analysis and synthesis of results. Practical (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Evaluate relevant literature and results of investigations to develop hypotheses and investigative approaches within the framework of interdisciplinary disease investigations.
  • LO2. Assess the advantages and limitations of contemporary disease investigation techniques and use this assessment to inform the development of hypotheses and investigative approaches.
  • LO3. Justify proposed disease scenario investigation approaches with specific reference to both the validity of the technical strategies and the applicability and relevance of the approach across broad social, scientific, and economic realms.
  • LO4. Describe and successfully carry out simple laboratory techniques associated with animal disease investigations.
  • LO5. Describe basic occupational health and safety and quality control issues and associated procedures and regulations associated with disease investigations in the laboratory.
  • LO6. Critically reflect upon completed disease investigations holistically and explain the importance of this reflection in the scientific process.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

We working with an new partner unit IMPA3888.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.