Skip to main content
Unit of study_

BADP2002: City Form and Development

Semester 1, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit builds on the content of Living Cities and introduces students to the modern formal domains of planning, urban design and heritage conservation. The focus will be on two main areas of debate, namely, city form and structure, and secondly, the planning and development processes on which the formal planned city is made. The unit will establish the context in which the role of planners, architects and urban designers in the process of building the 'incremental' city is understood, from the site to precinct, neighbourhood and city wide levels. Elements of city form and structure are analysed, as well as mobility, transport, land use, infrastructure and current policy responses at a metropolitan and local level in meeting urban growth needs. The unit will also overview the development process including the framework in which architects, planners and property developers must work. Using a contemporary planning framework, the nature of development assessment, strategic planning and the community's role within this framework are explored. Criticisms and reform agendas around frameworks will be examined. Informal urbanism is also introduced in this unit to address development that occurs outside the domain of formal western regulated planning and design systems.

Unit details and rules

Unit code BADP2002
Academic unit Urban and Regional Planning and Policy
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
DAAE1001 or (DAAE2002 and ENGG1850)
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Dallas Rogers, dallas.rogers@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Literature Review
Synthesise and discuss at least four (4) pieces of academic literature
40% Week 05
Due date: 31 Mar 2021 at 23:00
1,000 words +/-10% excluding references
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Assignment group assignment Urban Design Presentation
Each group will present their urban design portfolio to the class
10% Week 12
Due date: 24 May 2021 at 23:00
9 minutes +/- 1 minute
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Assignment group assignment Urban Design Portfolio
The portfolio will cover one urban theme in relate to the site
50% Week 12
Due date: 26 May 2021 at 23:00
2,000 and 4,000 words + 10 images
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

See Canvas

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or exceptional skill.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.

Credit

65 - 74

Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed, or work of excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Pass

50 - 64

Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

See Canvas

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Intergovernmental Planning and Development Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 02 Introduction to Urban Planning Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 03 Introduction to Urban Design Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 04 Industry Briefing Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Site Visit Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 06 Healthy Cities Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Planning Controls Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 08 Strategic Planning Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Expert Panel Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 10 Presenting Urban Research 1 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Presenting Urban Research 2 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Presentation Peer Review Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 13 Collaborative Urban Teaching Platform Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Attendance and class requirements

 

Please refer to the Resolutions of the University School: http://sydney.edu.au/handbooks/architecture/rules/faculty_resolutions.shtml

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

See Canvas

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. explain the roles of the urban planner and other stakeholders in development decision making
  • LO2. identify and explain the principal drivers that form cities and development
  • LO3. interpret and apply statutory and non-statutory planning policies and plans in terms of development control
  • LO4. work cooperatively in a team
  • LO5. identify and interpret information so that you can articulate some planning problems, using planning language, and identify solutions to these problems
  • LO6. present your work to the class in both verbal and written form to grow your presentation skills.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9
LO1         
LO2         
LO3         
LO4         
LO5         
LO6         

Alignment with Competency standards

Outcomes Competency standards
LO1
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
1. Design: Project briefing
1.1. Preparation & endorsement of an agreement between client and Architect. This agreement will clearly communicate terms, services to be provided, and fees appropriate for the scale and type of project.
1.2. Establishment, analysis and evaluation of client project requirements and objectives.
2.1. Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
2.2. Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
LO2
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
2.2. Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
LO3
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
2.2. Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
LO4
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
1. Design: Project briefing
1.1. Preparation & endorsement of an agreement between client and Architect. This agreement will clearly communicate terms, services to be provided, and fees appropriate for the scale and type of project.
1.2. Establishment, analysis and evaluation of client project requirements and objectives.
1.3. Assessment of project budget and timeframe against project requirements and objectives.
LO5
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
2.2. Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
LO6
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
2.2. Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
National Standard of Competency for Architects -
Competency code Taught, Practiced or Assessed Competency standard
1.1 T Preparation & endorsement of an agreement between client and Architect. This agreement will clearly communicate terms, services to be provided, and fees appropriate for the scale and type of project.
1.2 T Establishment, analysis and evaluation of client project requirements and objectives.
1.3 T Assessment of project budget and timeframe against project requirements and objectives.
1.7 T Preparation of project brief for approval by client and relevant stakeholders.
2.1 T Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
2.2 T Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
2.3 T Evaluation of factors influencing and impacting on project cost.

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Student feedback has been taken into consideration since this unit was last offered.

Site visit guidelines

Virtual site visit guidelines will be provided via Canvas

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.