Skip to main content
Unit of study_

BAEN3002: Design Integration Lab: Capstone

Semester 2, 2022 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

As the culminating design studio for the degree, the capstone project combines knowledge, criteria and methods of the disciplines of Architecture, Urban Planning, and Architectural Science. Students are presented with the opportunity to express and represent their own positioning through the analysis for and design of a sufficiently complex building, city structure, or town centre. The studio consolidates the students' abilities in identifying and solving problems and critical aspects for architecture and the built environment using a range of advanced modelling, simulation and optimisation techniques and methods. The aim for students is to produce an integrated and compelling pre-professional project prompted by the critical reflection of the built environment. With completion of this unit, students demonstrate their understanding of a spectrum of the built environment. By specialising in a select suite of these aspects, students prepare for career pathways as offered by the school's full range of postgraduate courses.

Unit details and rules

Unit code BAEN3002
Academic unit Architecture
Credit points 12
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
BAEN2001 and BAEN2002 and (BAEN3001 or BAEN3601)
Corequisites
? 
BADP3002
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Matthew Mindrup, matthew.mindrup@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Christopher Fox, c.fox@sydney.edu.au
Toktam Bashirzadeh Tabrizi, toktam.tabrizi@sydney.edu.au
Thomas Stromberg, thomas.stromberg@sydney.edu.au
Anthony Kong, anthony.kong@sydney.edu.au
Ryan Dingle, ryan.dingle@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Portfolio
Assignment
35% Formal exam period Consult your tutor about expectations
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO7 LO9
Presentation Mid-review
Assignment
15% Please select a valid week from the list below Consult your tutor about expectations
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO9 LO8 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Presentation Disciplinary Outcome
Assignment
20% Please select a valid week from the list below Consult your tutor about expectations
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO9 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Presentation Final-review
Assignment
25% Please select a valid week from the list below Consult your tutor about expectations
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO9 LO8 LO7 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Presentation Integrated Charette
Assignment
5% Week 02 1 week
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO9 LO7 LO5 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

  • Logbook Entries: Weeks 1 to 7 will be dedicated to the exploration and articulation of the key conceptual drivers for their projects. Students will submit and present their ideas during this conceptual stage individually.
  • Mid-term Proposal Reveiw: Weeks 1 to 6 will be dedicated to refining and developing conceptual drivers for their projects with clear implementation of the proposal. Students will submit and present their interim proposals individually.
  • Final-Review of Proposal: Weeks 8 to 12 will be dedicated to refining and further developing the proposal to its final stage and potential. Students will present their proposal individually.
  • Portfolio: This is a refinement and final development of the proposal. Students will submit their final proposal individually.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 LIVE: Introductions, Unit Overview; PRE-RECORDED LECTURES Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Tutorial Group Selections; Site visits; Consult tutor about additional design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6 LO9
Week 02 DISCIPLINARY SEMINAR Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Integrated Charette Due: Consult tutor about additional design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 03 LIVE and/or PRE-RECORDED Lectures Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Disciplinary Outcome #1: Consult tutor about specific design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO9
Week 04 LIVE and/or PRE-RECORDED Lectures Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Consult tutor about additional design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 05 LIVE and/or PRE-RECORDED Lectures Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Consult tutor about additional design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO9
Week 06 DISCIPLINARY SEMINAR Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Consult tutor about additional design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO7 LO9
Week 07 LIVE and/or PRE-RECORDED Lectures Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Disciplinary Outcome #2: Consult tutor about specific design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 08 LIVE and/or PRE-RECORDED Lectures Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Assessment 2a: Mid-review Pin-up Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO7 LO9
Week 09 DISCIPLINARY SEMINAR Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Consult tutor about specific design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO9
Week 10 LIVE and/or PRE-RECORDED Lectures Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Disciplinary Outcome #3: Consult tutor about specific design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO7 LO9
Week 11 LIVE and/or PRE-RECORDED Lectures Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Consult tutor about additional design progress expectations Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO9
Week 12 LIVE and/or PRE-RECORDED Lectures Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Consult tutor about additional design progress expectations. Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO9
Week 13 LIVE and/or PRE-RECORDED Lectures Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO5 LO9
Assessment 2b: Final-review Pin-up Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO7 LO8 LO9

Attendance and class requirements

Please refer to the Resolutions of the University School: http://sydney.edu.au/handbooks/architecture/rules/faculty_resolutions.shtml

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Consult your tutor

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate an understanding of place making within regional perspective
  • LO2. conceive of an architectural solution within the broader metropolitan vision and re-invigoration of a precinct
  • LO3. conceive an architectural solution to a brief within varying spatial perspectives, tied to design guidelines
  • LO4. create design guidelines based on local and regional urban planning strategies and best practice from architectural science
  • LO5. articulate the nexus between architecture, architectural science and urban planning and design and demonstrate their interrelationship through investigation, design and measurement of the design’s alignment with guidelines
  • LO6. effectively work in small teams
  • LO7. communicate the outcomes of investigations and design solutions by way of visual, written and verbal mode
  • LO8. critique the work of others demonstrating their understanding of the assessment tasks
  • LO9. demonstrate effective project management by achieving milestones and general professional behaviours such as meeting all deadlines and turning up to class on time.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Minor changes have been made to accommodate semester schedule and tutor feedback

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.