Skip to main content
Unit of study_

BDES2026: Architecture Studio 2A

Semester 1, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

Architecture Studio 2A is oriented towards the contemporary communicative dimensions of architecture, whilst remaining attentive to the deeper cultural and historical contexts in which modes of representation, particularly in regards to architectural drawings and models, has arisen and is currently situated. Recognising that there is necessarily an enigmatic relationship between an architectural drawing or model and the building that they might singly or collectively conjure into existence, the studio invites collusion between the architectural program and the means of its gestation, development and representation. An architectural representation might be analytical, rational and technical or it might be preparatory, coaxing, poetic or whimsical. That is, it can never be impartial - always filtering, selecting, editing, and emphasising certain aspects of reality and discarding or downgrading others. The studio project is conducted as a ‘conversation' between contemporary architectural ambitions, and the claims of the historically situated modes of communication - written, spoken, visual and physically constructed - that the students deploy to achieve them. It imparts knowledge and skills that will stimulate compelling architectural projects that are at once conceptually rigorous and technically adept. Students become increasingly attentive to the complexities of architectural design and are required to integrate multiple criteria, including thematic, conceptual, programmatic and technical concerns into a persuasive architectural proposition for a small-scale building in a charged urban context.

Unit details and rules

Unit code BDES2026
Academic unit Architecture
Credit points 12
Prohibitions
? 
BDES2010 or DESA2001 or BDES2012
Prerequisites
? 
BDES1027 or BDES1020 or DESA1002
Corequisites
? 
BDES2013
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Mahroo Moosavi, mahroo.moosavi@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Atelier Booklet Submission
Portfolio
60% Formal exam period Submission
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Presentation Phase 1 Design Presentation
Presentation of preliminary design
20% Week 07 individual presentation/submission
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Presentation Final Design Presentation
Presentation of final design
20% Week 13 individual presentation/submission
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Interim Design Presentation and submission (20%), Final Presentation and submission (20%) and Design Portfolio Submission (60%)

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or exceptional skill.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.

Credit

65 - 74

Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed, or work of excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Pass

50 - 64

Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed.

Fail

0 - 49

Work that does not demonstrate satisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning outcomes assessed.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Mark Deduction: 1cd per day

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Lecture: Introduction to course Overview of modules, tasks, strategies, schedules and deliverables Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Introduction First Task and Exercise Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 02 Lecture: Architecture as Atmosphere Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Studio Task 2 Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 03 Lecture: Architecture as Vehicle Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Studio Task 3 Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 04 Lecture: Architecture as Event Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Studio Task 4 Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Lecture: Architecture as Narrative Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Studio Task 5 Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 06 Lecture: Architecture as Weaving Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Studio Task 6 Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 07 Phase 1 Design Presentation Presentation (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 08 Lecture: Architecture as Organs Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Studio Task 8 Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 09 Lecture: Architecture as Body Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Studio Task 9 Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 10 Phase 2 Interim Design Presentation Presentation (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 11 Lecture: Architecture as Poetry 1 Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Studio Task 11 Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 12 Lecture: Architecture as Poetry 2 Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Studio Task 12 Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 13 Phase 2 Final Design Presentation Presentation (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7

Attendance and class requirements

The School’s requirement of 90% attendance is waived. Participation in this unit is required via online components.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings will be posted on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate an increased familiarity with the conventions of architectural drawing and model making, and an ability to employ these for the purposes of both critical analysis and creative expression
  • LO2. critically interpret an architectural brief for a small-scale public building in an urban setting, and devise an imaginative and plausible response
  • LO3. evaluate multiple written and graphic sources in order filter and synthesise information
  • LO4. produce architectural design across analogue and digital media
  • LO5. convincingly convey architectural propositions using oral, graphic and written modes of communication
  • LO6. evaluate feedback from others in a manner that is both reflective and proactive
  • LO7. write coherent and convincing accounts of the process of architectural design in sound academic prose, and to illustrate and compose these into formal documents.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

Alignment with Competency standards

Outcomes Competency standards
LO1
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
1.2. Establishment, analysis and evaluation of client project requirements and objectives.
1.4. Identification of factors that may impact on client project requirements and objectives.
3.1. Design response integrates the objectives of brief, user intent and built purpose.
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
LO2
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
2.1. Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
2.2. Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
3.1. Design response integrates the objectives of brief, user intent and built purpose.
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
3.3. Design response incorporates assessment of the physical location and relevant wider regional, contextual and environmental issues.
3.8. Application of manual and digital graphic techniques and modelling to describe three-dimensional form and spatial relationships.
4.1. Evaluation of design options in relation to project requirements.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
4.4. Inclusion of expertise of relevant specialists and consultants in developing the project design.
LO3
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
3.3. Design response incorporates assessment of the physical location and relevant wider regional, contextual and environmental issues.
3.4. Design response incorporates assessment of relevant legislation, codes and industry standards.
3.5. Exploration and application of ordering, sequencing and modelling of three-dimensional form and spatial content.
3.7. Assessment and integration of construction systems and materials consistent with project brief.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
4.4. Inclusion of expertise of relevant specialists and consultants in developing the project design.
4.5. Investigation and integration of appropriate structural, construction, service and transport systems in the project design.
4.6. Investigation and integration of appropriate material selection for the project design.
LO4
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
2.6. Preparation and analysis of project development options in response to project brief.
3.1. Design response integrates the objectives of brief, user intent and built purpose.
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
3.5. Exploration and application of ordering, sequencing and modelling of three-dimensional form and spatial content.
LO5
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
5.1. Application of creative imagination and aesthetic judgement in producing a resolved project design in regard to site planning, physical composition and spatial planning as appropriate to the project brief.
5.2. Resolution of project design addressing all building occupancy and functional aspects including spatial requirements and relationships and circulation aspects.
5.5. Integration of materials and components based upon an understanding of their physical properties.
5.7. Resolution of project design to address budget and time constraints.
LO6
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
4.4. Inclusion of expertise of relevant specialists and consultants in developing the project design.
5.1. Application of creative imagination and aesthetic judgement in producing a resolved project design in regard to site planning, physical composition and spatial planning as appropriate to the project brief.
5.5. Integration of materials and components based upon an understanding of their physical properties.
6.1. Identification and adoption of a strategy, program and process of documentation integrated through all project stages to enable project delivery.
6.2. Continuing coordination and integration of information and project material from relevant consultants, specialists and suppliers.
6.3. Incorporation of the project requirements and objectives in accordance with Project Brief and approved Detailed Design.
LO7
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
6.4. Timely completion and communication of accurate and comprehensible documents that will include, as required, drawings, models, specifications, schedules and other relevant modes of information.

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

In response to USS feedback, I adjusted some of the lecture content, rescheduled some formative assessment tasks, and provided additional material on Canvas.

Additional costs

There will be costs for material (modelmaking) as per individual student project.

Site visit guidelines

No class site visits but in own time.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.