Skip to main content
Unit of study_

BDES3026: Architecture Studio 3A

Semester 1, 2021 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Architecture Studio 3A is oriented towards the technical dimensions of architecture, whilst remaining attentive to the deeper cultural and historical context in which such technical knowledge, particularly in regards to structures and sustainability, has arisen and is currently situated. It imparts knowledge and skills that will stimulate compelling architectural projects that are conceptually rigorous, structurally innovating and technically adept. Structural knowledge is developed through a suite of lectures and accompanying practical exercises, and is assessed through technical reports and a final examination. They are required to integrate multiple criteria, including thematic, conceptual, programmatic and technical concerns into a persuasive architectural proposition.

Unit details and rules

Unit code BDES3026
Academic unit Architecture
Credit points 12
Prohibitions
? 
BDES3010 or DESA3001 or BDES3023 or BDES3616
Prerequisites
? 
(BDES2027 or BDES2020 or BDES2624) and (BDES2013 or BDES2613)
Corequisites
? 
BDES3011 or MATH2061
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Eduardo De Oliveira Barata, eduardo.barata@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Eduardo De Oliveira Barata, eduardo.barata@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment 5 Portfolio
Portfolio
60% Formal exam period To be added by the unit coordinator
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment group assignment 1 Structural "Large Shed" & "Experience of Water" Precedent Study
Presentation
5% Week 03 To be added by the unit coordinator
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment 2A Load Test Structural Model
Presentation of Structural Model
0% Week 05 To be added by the unit coordinator
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO5
Assignment 2B Structure Model Test Report
Design Assignment
10% Week 08 To be added by the unit coordinator
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment 3 Schematic Design
Presentation, Physical Model & Drawings
10% Week 08 To be added by the unit coordinator
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment 4 Detailed Design Presentation
Presentation, Physical Model & Drawings
15% Week 13 To be added by the unit coordinator
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Assessment 1

Large Shed Precedent

‘Large shed’ refers to a building type that is typically single storey and encloses a large volume space.

Students shall form pairs within their studio group, review the list of examples of ‘large shed’ buildings below and select one building to research, analyse and present to the group. 

The Experience of Water Precedent

The same pairs will also select one of the following examples and shall present the special experience of water / place architecture in the chosen case study.

Assessment 2A&B

Structural Model:  Make a model that represents the structure you studied in submission 1.

Testing and Reporting:  Present your response to the points below on one of the panels for your Schematic Design submission.  

Assessment 3

Schematic Design Interim Presentation

Assessment 4A

Detailed Design Presentation

Assessment 4B

Portfolio Submission

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or exceptional skill.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.

Credit

65 - 74

Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed, or work of excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Pass

50 - 64

Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed.

Fail

0 - 49

Work that does not demonstrate satisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning outcomes assessed.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction & outline of semester. Group allocation Architecture & Structure. Introduction / The Language of Structures (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr)  
Introduction. Discuss the project, select and review precedent examples. Site visit Studio (5 hr)  
Week 02 The Experience of Water. (Paul Berkemeier) 1 Way Structures (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr) LO3
Preliminary design strategies. Review draft precedent information & sheet layouts Studio (5 hr) LO1
Week 03 The Harbour, Waterways & Histories. (Craig Burton) 2 Way Structures (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr) LO1
SUBMISSION 1 Precedents & discussion within groups. Review design approach and structural ideas. Studio (5 hr) LO4
Week 04 Gunyama and Parramatta Park Pools. (Andrew Burgess) Structural Model Making & Testing (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr)  
Review progress of structural model. Schematic Design development Studio (5 hr) LO3
Week 05 Collaboration – Working as a Team. (Eduardo Barata) Floor Systems (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr) LO5
SUBMISSION 2A Carry out load test on structural model. Schematic Design development Studio (5 hr) LO5
Week 06 Timber in Multi Storey & Commercial Projects. (Jonathan Evans) Interpreting Model Testing (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr)  
Design Development Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 Pre-Fabrication & Assembly (Nick Elias) Cladding – Character & Detail Cladding Systems (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr)  
Design Development Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 08 SUBMISSION 2B Model test report for 2A & 2B SUBMISSION 3 JURY Present Schematic Design and Structural Test Report Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Architecture and Landscape – the public domain (Sacha Coles) Structure Supporting Architecture - 1 (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr) LO3 LO5
Review changes made in response to Jury feedback. Design Development Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 Presentation Techniques & Strategies (Eduardo Barata) Structure Supporting Architecture - 2 (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr) LO5
Design Development Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 11 Architecture Lecture TBC. Structural Diagrams (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr) LO3 LO5
Design Development Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 12 Architecture Lecture TBC. Substructure & Foundations (Richard Hough) Lecture (1.2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Design Development Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 13 SUBMISSION 4A JURY Present Detail Design Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Please refer to the Resolutions of the University School: http://sydney.edu.au/handbooks/architecture/rules/faculty_resolutions.shtml

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

ARCHITECTURE

Delirious New York Rem Koolhaas  OUP 1978

The Pool Book of Australian Exhibit at Venice Architecture Biennale 2016 Holliday, Toland and Tabet.

Best Indoor Pools https://www.ellaslist.com.au/articles/sydneys-top-indoor-swimming-pools

Best Pools In Sydney https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/10-of-the-best-swimming-pools-in-sydney/news-story/265bbd3c592212206aef62998c8f8c8b  

Servicing An Olympic POOL Article by Paul Stevenson – Arup Journal  1/1997

Places We Swim https://www.placesweswim.com/

The Wild Edge https://www.nicolelarkin.com/

 

STRUCTURE

Kapfinger and Kaufmann: Wood Works; Verlag 2008

Natterer et al: Timber Construction Manual; Birkhauser 2004

Allen and Zalewski: Form and Forces; Wiley 2010

Salvadori and Heller: Structure in Architecture; Pearson 2016

Engel: Structure Systems; Cantz 2007

Charleson, A : Structure As Architecture : A Source Book for Architects and Structural Engineers, 2nd Edition; Routledge, 2015.   Available from U Sydney Library as an e-book

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. identify and design appropriately for a full range of site factors including slope, orientation, outlook, context, and both micro- and macro-climate
  • LO2. employ appropriate circulation and activity spaces to achieve functional planning
  • LO3. design and integrate an appropriate structural layout and construction system
  • LO4. understand and employ the fundamental principles of ventilation, solar design, natural lighting and the performance of building materials and elements for passive comfort
  • LO5. integrate construction, structural and environmental design principles to produce an environmentally sustainable design exhibiting firmness, commodity and delight.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

Alignment with Competency standards

Outcomes Competency standards
LO1
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
1. Design: Project briefing
2.1. Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
2.2. Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
3.3. Design response incorporates assessment of the physical location and relevant wider regional, contextual and environmental issues.
3.5. Exploration and application of ordering, sequencing and modelling of three-dimensional form and spatial content.
3.8. Application of manual and digital graphic techniques and modelling to describe three-dimensional form and spatial relationships.
LO2
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
4.1. Evaluation of design options in relation to project requirements.
4.2. Evaluation of design options against values of physical, environmental and cultural contexts.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
4.6. Investigation and integration of appropriate material selection for the project design.
LO3
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
3.5. Exploration and application of ordering, sequencing and modelling of three-dimensional form and spatial content.
3.8. Application of manual and digital graphic techniques and modelling to describe three-dimensional form and spatial relationships.
4.5. Investigation and integration of appropriate structural, construction, service and transport systems in the project design.
4.6. Investigation and integration of appropriate material selection for the project design.
LO4
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
3.7. Assessment and integration of construction systems and materials consistent with project brief.
4.7. Coordination and integration of appropriate environmental systems, including for thermal comfort, lighting and acoustics.
5.5. Integration of materials and components based upon an understanding of their physical properties.
6.5. Nomination of quality and performance standards with regard to selected materials, finishes, fittings components and systems.
LO5
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
4.2. Evaluation of design options against values of physical, environmental and cultural contexts.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
5.2. Resolution of project design addressing all building occupancy and functional aspects including spatial requirements and relationships and circulation aspects.
5.5. Integration of materials and components based upon an understanding of their physical properties.

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

TBC

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.