Skip to main content
Unit of study_

BDES3027: Architecture Studio 3B

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

As the culminating design studio for the degree, students are presented with the opportunity to develop an architectural position within their projects. Architecture Studio 3B continues themes from Architecture Studio 3A, extending design understanding with respect to programmatic ambition and situating a symbolic public building proposal within a specific urban site. Particular attention is paid to the conventions of architectural representation as 'Communications' to doubly generate as well as conceptually clarify design opportunities. Computational modes of modelling are a particular focus. Structural, technical and material thinking is encouraged in coherent relation to students' strategic design intent and through studied historical and cultural awareness. The studio consolidates students' abilities in communicating and translating architecture using advanced modes of graphic visualisation through 3D modelling software and associated fabrication potentials. Hybrid techniques for moving between computational and actual realms are promoted in parallel with clarifying attitudes toward contemporary built and un-built environments. Depth of design development is promoted via a dual emphasis: early analysis of exemplary architectural thinking coupled with intensive speculative and projective exploration. Students aim to produce conceptually challenging, integrated and compelling pre-professional architectural design projects confronting a variety of spatial contexts.

Unit details and rules

Unit code BDES3027
Academic unit Architecture
Credit points 12
Prohibitions
? 
BDES3020 or DESA3002 or BDES3012
Prerequisites
? 
BDES3026 or BDES3010 or DESA3001 or BDES3616
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Catherine Lassen, catherine.lassen@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Phase 1 Design Presentation
Drawings + Models
20% Week 05
Due date: 22 Sep 2020 at 10:00

Closing date: 22 Sep 2020
Submit:10:00am Review:11:00am-5:00pm
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Assignment Phase 2 Final Design Presentation
Drawings + Models
20% Week 10
Due date: 03 Nov 2020 at 10:00

Closing date: 03 Nov 2020
Submit:10:00am Review:11:00am-5:00pm
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Design Portfolio
Portfolio Submission
60% Week 12
Due date: 17 Nov 2020 at 10:00

Closing date: 17 Nov 2020
Submit:10:00am Review:11:00am-5:00pm
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to Unit Lecture and tutorial (7 hr) LO3 LO4
Week 02 Utzon and the Sydney Opera House Lecture and tutorial (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 03 Critical Conversations: Utzon / Moneo Lecture and tutorial (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 04 Architectural program: 'Performance' Lecture and tutorial (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Assignment 1: Phase 1 Design / Utzon Research / Urban Mappings / Computational tutorials complete. Presentation (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 06 Design Development: History/Theory + Technology Lecture and tutorial (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 07 Design Development: Case Study Koolhaas Lecture and tutorial (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 08 Design Development: Case Study Tafuri Lecture and tutorial (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 09 Folio: Architectural Design Thinking Lecture and tutorial (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 10 Assignment 2: Final Design Presentation Presentation (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 11 Design Development: Folio Lecture and tutorial (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 12 Assignment 3: Portfolio Submission Presentation (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance (via Zoom or in person) at all scheduled lecture, tutorial and studio sessions of Architecture Studio 3B is mandatory, except in the case of illness or misadventure, in accordance with the School’s attendance policy. Attendance means arriving at the time required and staying until teaching ends.

Attendance via Zoom will require participant’s camera to be switched on and used for the duration of the class.

Attendance and contribution to class discussion will be monitored and may be factored into allocated grades. Announcements made at Synchronous Zoom lectures are deemed to be made to the whole group. Contact with staff should generally be within the allocated teaching times. Consultation outside of these hours shall be by prior appointment, and in addition to, not in lieu of, the regular class time.

The timetable is subject to minor adjustment, and individual tutors may issue more detailed schedules. Check your University email regularly as it will be the way any changes to the timetable or clarifications of the program are issued.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the course site on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate an increased understanding with the conventions of architectural drawing and model making, and an ability to employ these for the purposes of both critical analysis and creative expression
  • LO2. critically research and interpret an architectural brief for a medium-scale public building in an urban setting, and devise an imaginative and credible response
  • LO3. evaluate multiple written and graphic sources in order to filter and synthesise information
  • LO4. work productively in an architectural studio setting
  • LO5. convincingly convey architectural propositions using oral, graphic and written modes of communication
  • LO6. evaluate feedback from others in a manner that is both reflective and proactive
  • LO7. write coherent and convincing accounts of the process of architectural design in sound academic prose, and to illustrate and compose these into formal documents.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

A number of changes have been made to this unit in response to student feedback: - Computational tutorials in Grasshopper are now optional rather than mandatory. Computational skill building is still supported via four required online 'ArchiStar Academy' tutorials but students can now select which digital capacities they wish to develop. - For students that would prefer to conduct research into a work by an architect other than Utzon, they may now do so with the permission of their tutor. They will be required to make an argument for the depth of development in their nominated architectural project and the internally coherent thinking embodied within the design. - There will be no group work nor required group site model. Site models will be pre-made for each studio group to allow more time to be devoted to design testing. - An extra DMaF workshop will be provided during the mid-semester break to teach students, who have signed-up, how to use the CNC routing machine to construct 3D topographies for site models.

Additional costs

There will be printing and model making costs associated with this unit of study.

Work, health and safety

There are no specific WHS requirements for this unit

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.