Skip to main content

Due to the exceptional circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the learning activities, assessments and attendance requirements for this unit may be subject to late changes. Please refer to this unit outline regularly for up to date information and to notices in the unit’s Canvas site for any adjustments.

Unit of study_

CIVL3310: Humanitarian Engineering

Humanitarian Engineering is the application of engineering to meet the needs of communities globally; while maintaining a focus on sustainability and appropriateness. This unit will give an introduction to engineers from all disciplines about the unique skills and knowledge needed to tackle challenges in; developing countries, during all stages of disasters and indigenous communities. Achieving global sustainability is a consistent theme through-out the subject. The unit will develop skills in intra-disciplinary teamwork and cross-cultural competence. The subject is taught through a series of lectures based on real case studies and engaging guest seminars. Seminars presenters are all people who are currently working in the field of humanitarian engineering with representatives from industry, government, multi-lateral organisations and non-government organisations. This unit of study is the first lecture based subject in the Humanitarian Engineering major. The unit aligns as a 3rd year elective and is a prerequisite for 4th year subject in the Humanitarian Engineering major CIVL5320 Engineering for Sustainable Development.

Details

Academic unit Civil Engineering
Unit code CIVL3310
Unit name Humanitarian Engineering
Session, year
? 
Semester 1, 2020
Attendance mode Normal day
Location Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney
Credit points 6

Enrolment rules

Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff and contact details

Coordinator Jacqueline Marie Thomas, jacqueline.thomas@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Jacqueline Marie Thomas, jacqueline.thomas@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Final exam Final exam
30% Formal exam period 2 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3
Participation Tutorial participation
10% Multiple weeks n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO1 LO3
Presentation Individual presentation on SDGs
10% Week 04 n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3
Small test Mid-semester quiz
Quiz with short and long answer questions
15% Week 07
Due date: 06 Apr 2020
1 hr mid-semester quiz
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment Interview report
Details are available on Canvas
15% Week 08 Report
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3
Assignment group assignment Disaster planning refugee camp report
10% Week 10 n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO1 LO3
Assignment group assignment Disaster planning refugee camp model
10% Week 10 n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO1 LO3
group assignment = group assignment ?
  • Individual presentation: Individually present on a chosen sustainable development goal, its importance and the role of engineers. The individual performance will be marked by grading by peers.
  • Tutorial participation: Preparation, engagement and participation in the tutorial will be assessed each week over the semester.
  • Interview report: Individually, students will conduct a structured interview with a person who has lived in a developing country. That can either be from birth or during work. The interview will draw out the positives and negatives as well as the role of engineering in development.
  • Mid-semester quiz: Assessment of the knowledge and understanding of the first half of the course. Short and long answer and held during the normal Monday lecture.
  • Disaster planning refugee camp report: In assigned intra-discipline engineering groups of three people, the team is to use the Sphere Handbook standards to design a refugee camp for a given scenario. The team will present their design in the as a joint report.
  • Disaster planning refugee camp model: In the same teams, students will use the Sphere Handbook standards to design a refugee camp for a given scenario. The team will then use a model to present their design in the tutorials as a presentation.
  • Decentralised technologies report: Individually students will research decentralized technologies and select a technology that will beneficial to remote communities. Students will then present their chosen technology during the tutorials as well as handing in a brief report.
  • Final exam: During exams students will sit a closed book exam which will assess the knowledge of the concepts that were taught (including guest seminar content). The questions will be mix of short and long answer.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Standard university penalties apply: > 5 % penalty per day up until 10 days > After 10 days a zero mark is awarded

Special consideration

If you experience short-term circumstances beyond your control, such as illness, injury or misadventure or if you have essential commitments which impact your preparation or performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic honesty, academic dishonesty, and the resources available to all students.

The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic dishonesty or plagiarism seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic dishonesty. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of dishonesty, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Multiple weeks During every odd week, there will be a 1.5 hr presentations from an industry professional. The format of these workshops are designed to encourage discussion. Workshop (1.5 hr) LO1 LO4
Weekly Weekly lectures provide the main content delivery and interactive activities Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4
Tutorials will commence in Week 2. Activities are designed to allow students to apply the lecture material. In set weeks the tutorials will be held in the Immersive Learning Laboratory. Tutorial (2 hr) LO2 LO3

Attendance and class requirements

Attending lectures and workshops is highly encouraged to gain the most from the interactive discussions. Tutorial attendance is compulsory to participate in laboratories and group work.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University’s graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Explain the professional roles and ethical considerations of engineers working in the context of humanitarian engineering (developing countries, disasters and remote areas)
  • LO2. Work in a small team with different engineering disciplines to solve an engineering challenge
  • LO3. Use analytical and evaluation skills to present the theoretical and practical considerations for project success and failure in humanitarian engineering.
  • LO4. Explain how engineers contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

Graduate qualities

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

Alignment with other standards

Outcomes Other standards
LO1
Eng Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators
1.2.Tackling technically challenging problems from first principles.
2.1.Appropriate range and depth of learning in the technical domains comprising the field of practice informed by national and international benchmarks.
2.3.Meaningful engagement with current technical and professional practices and issues in the designated field.
3.4.An understanding of and commitment to ethical and professional responsibilities.
3.7.A capacity for lifelong learning and professional development and appropriate professional attitudes.
5.3.Skills in the selection and characterisation of engineering systems, devices, components and materials.
5.4.Skills in the selection and application of appropriate engineering resources tools and techniques, appreciation of accuracy and limitations;.
LO2
LO3
LO4
This subject has been updated with a change in assessment to give students feedback earlier in the course.

Work, health and safety

There are specific WHS requirements for the Immersive Learning Laboratory. These will be shared during the laboratory sessions.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.