Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ECOS4212: Economics of Program Evaluation

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit of study develops the knowledge and skills required for the economic evaluation of government programs. Across a range of policy domains including health, education, crime and the environment, governments are increasingly seeking advice on the economic evaluation of policy proposals. In this unit the economic tools and skills used to evaluate policies across a range of domains are introduced and critically examined. Emphasis will be placed on the empirical approaches used to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of government programs through the use of real world data.

Unit details and rules

Unit code ECOS4212
Academic unit Economics
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
ECOS4201 or ECOS4202
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Juliana Silva Goncalves, juliana.goncalves@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Juliana Silva Goncalves, juliana.goncalves@sydney.edu.au
Alastair Fraser, alastair.fraser@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment group assignment Stata Do-file for replication of research findings
Stata do-file replicating the empirical analysis of a program evaluation.
20% Week 08
Due date: 07 Oct 2021 at 14:00
N/A
Outcomes assessed: LO4
Assignment Explanation of the Stata Do-file written for replication
Oral presentation of the do-file.
10% Week 08 10 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO4
Assignment Essay on program evaluation
Program evaluation essay, based on a real-world scenario.
50% Week 12
Due date: 04 Nov 2021 at 14:00
2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO5 LO2 LO1 LO6
Presentation group assignment Research Article Presentation
In-class presentation of the research article used for the replication.
10% Week 13 15-20 min
Outcomes assessed: LO6 LO3
Assignment Summary of the research article used for replication
Summarise research questions, methods and findings from group presentation.
10% Week 13
Due date: 11 Nov 2021 at 14:00
750 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO6
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Task 1: Replicating the results of a research article on program evaluation.

Assessment items:

1) Written Stata do-file of the replication. Group assessment. Weight: 20%.

2) Explanation of the do-file (10-min oral individual discussion with the lecturer). Individual assessment. Weight: 10%.

 

Task 2: Essay on program evaluation, based on a real-world scenario.

Assessment items:

3) Written essay, including a literature review on the topic, detailed proposal of an empirical plan to evaluate the program, discussion of strength and weaknesses of the proposed plan. (2000 words). Individual assessment. Weight: 50%.

 

Task 3: Presentation of the research article used for the replication.

Assessment items:

4) In-class presentation of the article (15-20 min). Group assessment. Weight: 10%.

5) Hand-in a written summary of the research questions, methods and findings (750 words). Individual assessment. Weight: 10%.

Assessment criteria

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

To be awarded to students who, in their performance in assessment tasks, demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an exceptional standard as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars established by the faculty.

Distinction

75 - 84

To be awarded to students who, in their performance in assessment tasks, demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a very high standard as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars established by the faculty. 

Credit

65 - 74

To be awarded to students who, in their performance in assessment tasks, demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a good standard as
defined by grade descriptors or exemplars established by the faculty.

Pass

50 - 64

To be awarded to students who, in their performance in assessment tasks, demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars established by the faculty.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Overview of the unit: Introduction to Economics of Program Evaluation, Overview of lecture topics, Assessment and Schedule. Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 02 Randomised Controlled Trials Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5
Week 03 Step-by-Step Program Evaluation Replication Seminar (3 hr) LO4
Week 04 Behavioural Economics: Laboratory experiments Seminar (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 05 Behavioural Economics: Lab-in-the-field experiments Seminar (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 06 In-class support with replication assessment Seminar (3 hr) LO4
Week 07 Quasi-experimental methods: Difference-in-Difference Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5
Week 08 Quasi-experimental methods: Regression Discontinuity Design Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5
Week 09 Non-experimental methods: Instrumental Variables Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5
Week 10 Cost-Benefit Analysis and Evaluation of Business Case Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5
Week 11 Cost-Benefit Analysis & Evaluation of Business Case & Presentation Skills Workshop Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Unit Review & Summary Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 13 In-class student presentations of research articles on program evaluation. Presentation (3 hr) LO6

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library eReserve, available on Canvas

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Describe the key empirical methods in economics to evaluate the causal impact of programs aiming at improving outcomes for individuals and the wider society.
  • LO2. Describe the behavioural and experimental methods in economics that can guide the design of programs and shed light on the behavioural channels through which programs succeed or fail.
  • LO3. Critically evaluate the assumptions and limitations of the empirical methods used to evaluate programs.
  • LO4. Apply program evaluation methods to an existing dataset and evaluate the impact of a program.
  • LO5. Develop a program evaluation plan, including identifying i) the most adequate empirical methods for the impact evaluation, and ii) the experimental methods to identify the effect of the program on individual behaviour.
  • LO6. Communicate the process of and results from program evaluations.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time the unit will be taught

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.