Skip to main content
Unit of study_

EDPZ5003: Thesis Proposal Writing

Semester 1, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit is designed to support PhD, EdD, DSW and MPhil students as they prepare their thesis proposals for formal review and approval, through a program of workshops organised around issues in thinking, reading and writing about research design and practice. Workshops explore a range of approaches to writing about research practice and emphasise the common logic of the research process, and the importance of rigorous and systematic approaches to writing about design and analysis in all research traditions.

Unit details and rules

Unit code EDPZ5003
Academic unit Education
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Ilektra Spandagou, ilektra.spandagou@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Research Proposal Part 2
Details on Canvas
50% Mid-semester break
Due date: 17 Jun 2021 at 23:59
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Assignment Research Proposal Part 1
Details on Canvas
50% Week 08
Due date: 29 Apr 2021 at 23:59
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2

Assessment summary

Research Proposal Part 1 – Submission covers the aims and significance of the proposed project with use of relevant literature. 

Research Proposal Part 2 – Submission covers a literature review on key concepts and description of the proposed methodology. 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Preparation readings to be provided Independent study (1 hr) LO1
Week 02 Introduction to research reading, writing and design Seminar (2 hr) LO1
Week 03 The thesis proposal Seminar (2 hr) LO1
Week 04 Writing a literature review for a thesis proposal: purposes, processes, pitfalls Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 05 Optimising your use of online Library resources Seminar (2 hr) LO1
Week 06 Writing research questions Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Theory, coherence and rigour in research design Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 08 Writing workshop: The background to your study Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 09 Writing workshop: The social/education and research significance of your study Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 10 Writing workshop: The literature review Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 11 Writing workshop: Refining your research questions Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 12 The research design for your study Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 13 Ethical considerations Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: The Sydney School of Education and Social Work requires attendance of at least 90 percent of all seminars, workshops or lectures. Where a student is unable to attend at the required rate evidence of illness or misadventure may be required and the student may be required to undertake extra work. Students should discuss the circumstances of their absence(s) with the co-ordinator of the unit of study. Further details are provided in the School canvas site: https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/13426

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit are available on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Critically engage with the different elements of a thesis proposal;
  • LO2. Utilise your knowledge in writing up the thesis proposal
  • LO3. DIscuss research design and writing and support others in collegial ways.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit is reviewed based on students' feedback. In 2020, the assessment task was separated in Part 1 and Part 2 to allow for revisiting the different sections of the proposal in the two versions. Students found this very helpful in the development of their research proposal. For 2021, a fine-tuned version of the distinction of elements between Part 1 and part 2 will be introduced in the iterative process of developing the research proposal.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.