Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ENGL4131: Language and Subject

Semester 1, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This course explores twentieth century attempts to understand the relation of language and linguistic meaning to the individual subject. We will consider two traditions: a 'naturalistic' approach centred around Chomsky's 'generative enterprise', and the phenomenological/hermeneutic tradition in Merleau-Ponty and Gadamer. Students will familiarise themselves with various putatively scientific attempts to understand the place of language in the world and will explore some general features of the relation between meaning and experience. No prior acquaintance with these fields is assumed.

Unit details and rules

Unit code ENGL4131
Academic unit
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Nick Riemer, nick.riemer@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Option 2 Part A: conference presentation
Conference presentation (50%)
0% - 20 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Assignment Option 1: Essay
n/a
100% Formal exam period
Due date: 09 Jun 2020 at 23:59
6000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Assignment Option 2 Part B: conference write-up (50%)
0% Formal exam period
Due date: 24 Jun 2020 at 23:59
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

Please refer to the specific Honours Marking scale in the Honours Handbook on  Canvas

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Overview - text, interpretation, and meaning Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 02 Linguistic meaning and mentality Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 03 Linguistic meaning and literality Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 04 Interpreting cultural difference - Wierzbicka Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 05 Interpreting cultural difference - Taylor Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 06 Interpretation and the human sciences - Taylor Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 07 Gadamer 1 Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 08 Gadamer 2 Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 09 Gadamer 3 Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 10 Gadamer 4 Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 11 Gadamer 5 Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 12 Gadamer 6 Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 13 Gadamer 7 Seminar (2 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Students should buy a copy of Gadamer's Truth and Method (2nd edition, Weinsheimer and Marshall, translators). Copies have been specially ordered for the course and are available for sale at Gleebooks, 49 Glebe Point Rd.

Asterisked texts will be supplied. Journal articles should be retrieved from the library's collection in the usual way. Book chapters will be available for download from the library's usual course reading service.

Week 1. Overview

Hirsch, E.D. 1960. Objective interpretation. Proceedings of the Modern Language Association 75: 466-468.

Week 2. Linguistic meaning and mentality

Noam Chomsky, Verbal Behavior [Review of BF Skinner]. Language 35 (1959): 26-58

Week 3. Linguistic meaning and literality

Toolan, Michael. 1996. On inscribed or literal meaning. Chapter 1 of Total Speech. An Integrational Linguistic Approach to Language. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Week 4. Interpreting cultural difference 1

Anna Wierzbicka 1999. Introduction: feelings, languages and cultures. Chapter 1 of Emotions across languages and cultures. Cambridge: CUP.

Week 5. Interpreting cultural difference 2

*Charles Taylor 1985. Understanding and ethnocentricity. In Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: CUP, 116-133

Week 6. Interpretation and the human sciences

Charles Taylor 1985. Interpretation and the sciences of man. In Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: CUP, 15-57.

Week 7 Gadamer 1

Hans-Georg Gadamer, *Man and language (1966); *The nature of things and the Language of things (1960) and *Semantics and hermeneutics (1972). In Philosophical Hermeneutics (Linge, ed. and trans.) Berkeley: University of California Press.

Week 8 Gadamer 2

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Introduction and Foreward to the 2nd edition, Truth and Method.

Week 9. Gadamer 3

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method (2ed). Chapter 4 1A (i) Heidegger's Disclosure of the Fore-Structure of Understanding– 1B (i) The Rehabilitation of Authority and Tradition (inclusive), 1B (iii) The Hermeneutic Significance of Temporal Distance.

Week 10. Gadamer 4

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method (2ed). Chapter 5. Part 1. Language as the medium of hermeneutic experience.

Week 11. Gadamer 5

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method (2ed). Chapter 5. Part 2. The development of the concept of language in the history of Western thought. This is to be read in the context of Plato, Cratylus (any translation)

Week 12. Gadamer 6

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method (2ed). Chapter 5. Part 3. Language as horizon of a hermeneutic ontology.

Week 13. Gadamer 7

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method (2ed). Chapter 5. Part 3. Language as horizon of a hermeneutic ontology.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate a familiarity with theoretical approaches to linguistic interpretation from a variety of twentieth century intellectual traditions
  • LO2. engage confidently in open and unstructured discussion on these questions
  • LO3. confidently challenge the premises of instrumental reason as it applies to language and textuality.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.