Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ENVI5801: Social Science of Environment

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit provides both a conceptual and an empirical foundation for the analysis of relationships between society, the environment and natural resources. In our recent past the rapid rate of global environmental change has necessitated a breakdown of traditional disciplinary boundaries in research and social scientists are increasingly called upon to work alongside natural scientists in unraveling the complexities of the human-environmental nexus. Students will examine a number of environmental issues and consider a variety of social science academic perspectives about environmental management.

Unit details and rules

Unit code ENVI5801
Academic unit Geosciences Academic Operations
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Jeffrey Neilson, jeffrey.neilson@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation Participation in class discussions
Students are assessed based on class participation.
10% Ongoing Ongoing
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Online discussion board posts
Students make online discussion posts in Canvas.
20% Ongoing
Closing date: 04 Jun 2021
At least 4 posts (800 words in total).
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Article Review
Review of an academic article
20% Week 04
Due date: 19 Mar 2021 at 17:00
800 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment Environmental management essay
Students are to write a major essay.
50% Week 13
Due date: 28 May 2021 at 17:00
2000 words (excluding references)
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Assessment summary

  • Article Review: Students are required to review a journal article from a list provided. Students should submit an 800 word review that highlights how the authors use social science to address an environmental challenge and reflect upon the usefulness of these findings.
  • Online discussion participation: Throughout semester, you are required to make posts on the discussion board of the Canvas site about the week’s topic. These should be posted during the week of the lecture topic. THE DISCUSSION BOARD WILL BE CLOSED AT THE END OF THE WEEK. You are required to: i) critically reflect on the required readings and any other relevant material, highlighting aspects you either found interesting and novel, or alternatively aspects which you would like to critique; ii) demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic(s); and iii). respond appropriately to (and not repeat arguments made in) previous posts. You are expected to make at least 4 posts throughout the semester and contribute approximately 800 words.
  • Major essay: The essay should address one of the prescribed essay questions. More information on the essay will be provided on Canvas. The essay will need to develop a logical argument and demonstrate an understanding of social science concepts. Students are expected to draw upon a variety of literature sources, including articles published in the peer-reviewed academic literature.
  • Participation in class discussions: Students are expected to attend lectures and discussions each week of the semester and to make thoughtful, informed and considered contributions to the discussion. Students should have read the required reading prior to coming to class and be ready to give their opinions and responses to the reading. Students will be assessed based on the quality of their contribution to these discussions. Wherever possible, remote students are expected to have CAMERAS TURNED ON to facilitate engagement. 

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Student’s work is i) innovative, ii) original and iii) highly analytical. Written work is at a standard that could potentially be published for a broader readership, and it contains no factual, referencing or grammatical errors. Demonstrates an intimate conceptual understanding of a broad literature and uses this to make sophisticated arguments and promote thought-provoking discussion during lectures and tutorials. Draws on a wide variety of reference material to develop advanced understanding of pertinent development issues.

Distinction

75 - 84

Performs at a high level of competence meeting at least two of the three HD criteria. Written work is at a high standard with few factual, referencing or grammatical errors. Demonstrates a strong conceptual understanding of the literature and uses this effectively to make logical arguments and actively engage in class discussions. Able to clearly articulate an understanding of all concepts in an exam format.

Credit

65 - 74

The defining difference between a ‘credit’ and ‘distinction’ grade is a powerful and original argument binding essays together in a Distinction and the possible appearance of some factual, referencing or grammatical errors in a Credit grade. Credit essays will, however, still have a logically constructed argument and be well-written, but may lack originality or flair. While raw data will be used, it may be less effectively presented. Credit-level exam responses will address the question and comply with basic requirements of the task, but may do so indirectly or suggesting a partial understanding of the question. Provides original and thoughtful contributions to debate most of the time, capturing the main points of the seminar in an informed way with solid attendance

Pass

50 - 64

Addresses the question and complies with the basic requirements of the task, but indicates a rudimentary understanding of key concepts, with limited exploration of reputable literature, and whose written work usually contains some factual, referencing or grammatical errors. Contributes sometimes to class debate, but doesn’t show a deep conceptual understanding of the issues, and may have some unexplained absences.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

5% per day for article review and major essay.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Why social science of the environment? (Neilson) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 02 Environmental governance (Neilson) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 03 Leveraging narratives and worldviews (El Khoury) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 Economics and the environment (Neilson) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 05 Politics and the environment (EL Khoury) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 06 Common property and collective action (Fisher) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 07 Community-based natural resource management (Fisher) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 08 Gender and the environment (El Khoury) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 10 Social Impact Assessment (Fisher) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 11 Caring for Country: indigenous people and the environment (El Khoury) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 12 Climate change and social science (Fisher) Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 13 Conclusion and future research Tutorial (2 hr) LO2

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: Attendance at lectures and seminars will be recorded and attendance at 80% minimum of classes is required to pass this Unit (unless special consideration is provided).

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All students are expected to come to the lecture and tutorial prepared to discuss the reading. These are “required readings” – essential for every student. Some weeks also have “suggested readings” for students who wish to develop a deeper understanding of the topic.

The Reading List will be posted on Canvas.

 

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate an awareness of the diversity of social science approaches used to study the relationship between society and the environment
  • LO2. demonstrate an understanding of the ways in which social sciences engages in, addresses and contributes towards solving environmental issues
  • LO3. demonstrate an awareness of the role of social scientists as policy-makers and environmental managers
  • LO4. recognise the social science dimension of environmental problems as part of an integrated trans-disciplinary approach.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Based on student feedback, a new room has been booked, more specific information has been provided on the revised assessment tasks. The class format has been changed to a lecture followed by a tutorial.

Work, health and safety

We are governed by the Work Health and Safety Act 2011, Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 and Codes of Practice. Penalties for non-compliance have increased. Everyone has a responsibility for health and safety at work. The University’s Work Health and Safety policy explains the responsibilities and expectations of workers and others, and the procedures for managing WHS risks associated with University activities.

General Laboratory Safety Rules

  • No eating or drinking is allowed in any laboratory under any circumstances

  • A laboratory coat and closed-toe shoes are mandatory

  • Follow safety instructions in your manual and posted in laboratories

  • In case of fire, follow instructions posted outside the laboratory door

  • First aid kits, eye wash and fire extinguishers are located in or immediately outside each laboratory

  • As a precautionary measure, it is recommended that you have a current tetanus immunisation. This can be obtained from University Health Service: unihealth.usyd.edu.au/

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.