High distinction

85 - 100

Outstanding or exceptional work clearly demonstrating originality and a flair for the subject.

• Demonstration of initiative and complex understanding in applying scientific programming techniques to evaluate environment systems
• Evidence of independent and extensive reading and use of high-quality peer-reviewed information to support written arguments when required.
• Arguments clearly articulated, project work is well written and coded, shows clarity of thought and excellent expression of ideas.
• Very high standard of presentation and interpretation of analytical results.

Distinction

75 - 84

Demonstration of high-level aptitude for the subject area and strong understanding of the material.

• Evidence of independent thought and critical thinking in applying scientific libraries to quantify environmental systems
• Project work is well written, shows clarity of thought and expression of ideas.
• Very high standard of presentation and interpretation of analytical results.

Credit

65 - 74

Evidence of sound knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts

• Some evidence of independent thought and critical thinking in applying scientific libraries to quantify environmental systems
• Thorough understanding of material presented in practical sessions, lectures and readings.
• Good written expression and clear interpretation and presentation of analytical results.

Pass

50 - 64

Demonstrate a satisfactory knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts

• Basic ability in applying scientific libraries to quantify environmental systems
• There may be significant analytical errors or omissions
• Minimal interpretation of analytical results and ideas
• Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised

Fail

0 - 49

Fails to satisfy minimum requirements

• Limited ability in applying scientific libraries to quantify environmental systems
• Demonstrates unsatisfactory or inadequate level of understanding of subject area
• Demonstrates minimal relevant knowledge or understanding of principles and concepts
• Poor written expression, with numerous typographical and grammatical errors