Skip to main content
Unit of study_

EUST2601: European Encounters

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

European writers and intellectuals have reflected critically on their own values, attitudes, customs and cultures through comparison with other cultures and societies since the Enlightenment. This long history has resulted in profound reconsiderations of the concept of Europe and its civilization. The aim of European Encounters is to consider the ways in which Europeans have questioned their own value-systems through literary and intellectual encounters with other nations, cultures and civilizations since the beginnings of modernity.

Unit details and rules

Unit code EUST2601
Academic unit European Studies
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at?1000?level in European Studies or a European or Middle-Eastern language
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Peter Morgan, peter.morgan@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Discussion boards
online discussion board
20% Progressive 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Assignment Assignment 1
Summary and critical analysis
20% Week 05
Due date: 29 Sep 2020 at 00:00
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Assignment Quiz 1
online quizzes
10% Week 06 250 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Assignment Quiz 2
Online quizz
10% Week 12 250 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Assignment Essay
Comparison and contrast of texts/events with theoretical component
40% Week 13
Due date: 23 Nov 2020 at 00:00
2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1

Assessment summary

see details on Canvas

Assessment criteria

Result name

Mark range

 

Pass

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50-64

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·     Written work contains evidence of a broad and reasonably accurate command of the subject matter and some sense of its broader significance, offers synthesis and some evaluation of material, demonstrates an effort to go beyond the essential reading, contains clear focus on the principal issues, understanding of relevant arguments and diverse interpretations, and a coherent argument grounded in relevant evidence, though there may be some weaknesses of clarify or structure.

·     Articulate, properly documented.

Credit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65-74

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Highly competent work, demonstrating clear capacity to complete Honours successfully.

·     Evidence of extensive reading and initiative in research, sound grasp of subject matter and appreciation of key issues and context.

·     Engages critically and creatively with the question, and attempts an analytical evaluation of material.

·     Makes a good attempt to critique various historical interpretations, and offers a pointed and thoughtful contribution to an existing historical debate.

·     Some evidence of ability to think theoretically as well as empirically, and to conceptualise and problematise issues in historical terms.

Distinction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75-84

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Work of a superior standard

·         The work demonstrates an intelligent understanding of, and individual engagement with material; 

·         analyzes focal texts or issues appositely; 

·         addresses an issue and presents a well-argued, coherent case; 

·         demonstrates careful thought about the critical, historical and/or theoretical context of the texts or issues; 

·         provides evidence of reading beyond what is strictly required for the task; 

·         is properly referenced and well presented.

·         The writing is characterized by individuality, clarity, and independent insight.

·         Written work demonstrates initiative in research and reading, complex understanding and original analysis of subject matter and its context, both empirical and theoretical; 

 

High Distinction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85-100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Work of exceptional standard.

·         The work demonstrates a deep and intelligent understanding of, and individual engagement with material; 

·         presents a very close analysis of focal texts or issues; 

·         addresses a specific issue and develops an independent critical or theoretical argument successfully; 

·         indicates awareness of complexities and qualifications in argumentation; 

·         demonstrates careful thought about the critical, historical and/or theoretical context of the texts or issues; 

·         provides evidence of wide-ranging reading; 

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. 1. Describe with detailed reference to case-studies and examples, how writers and intellectuals have critically reflected on aspects of European self-understanding since the 16th century (including concepts of civilisation, civil society, progress, Eurocentrism, and relationships between European, Western and non-Western cultures and civilisations) in accurate and culturally sensitive language; 2. Critically analyse and interpret primary and secondary sources with a view to identifying essential aspects of European self-understanding in literature, philosophy, social theory and film from the 16th century until the present; 3. Analyse relevant material in order to construct informed arguments regarding aspects of European self-understanding in intellectual history; 4. Undertake research in order to analyse, interpret and critically compare and contrast selected examples of European self-understanding in literary and other texts; 5. Apply relevant disciplinary and methodological approaches to the study and evaluation of European attitudes and self-understandings since the beginning of modernity; 6. Make informed contributions to group discussions of European values, self-understandings and identity and provide critical and/or analytical reflections on group discussions and assignments. 7. Present succinct, clearly formulated, articulate and informed arguments for group discussion, based on ethical scholarly research and presented in a spirit of cultural and inter-cultural sensitivity, tolerance and inclusiveness.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit has been substantially redeveloped in line with student feedback and in order to engage with issues of contemporary interest.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.