Skip to main content
Unit of study_

EUST3007: Ideas of Europe

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

What is Europe? A geographical region? A political project? Where does it begin and end? What are its characteristics? These questions have occupied thinkers within and beyond Europe for millennia. The answers they have found shape our ideas of Europe today. This unit introduces students to ideas of Europe from antiquity to the present day. Reading texts by figures from Aristotle to Immanuel Kant, Napoleon Bonaparte, Fyodor Dostoevsky and Winston Churchill, it provides an overview of European history of ideas by examining the history of the European idea itself.

Unit details and rules

Unit code EUST3007
Academic unit European Studies
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in the European Studies major
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Danica Jenkins Jenkins, danica.jenkins@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Textual commentary plan
Plan of commentary on chosen set text
10% Week 05 500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment Textual commentary
Textual commentary on chosen set text
30% Week 07 2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment Essay plan
Plan of research essay
10% Week 08 500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Assignment Research essay
Research essay
50% Week 12 3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5

Assessment summary

See Canvas for details

Assessment criteria

Textual commentary 

Result code

Result name

Mark range

Description

HD

High distinction

85 - 100

There is excellent understanding of the passage, demonstrated by persuasive interpretation supported by effective references to the passage.

Excellent situation of the passage in its historical/cultural context. 

Outstanding analysis and appreciation of the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape meaning. 

Ideas are persuasively organized, with excellent structure, coherence and development. 

Language is very clear, effective, carefully chosen and precise, with a high degree of accuracy in grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction; register and style are effective and appropriate to the commentary.

DI

Distinction

75 - 84

There is very good understanding of the passage, demonstrated by persuasive interpretation supported by effective references to the passage.

Very good situation of the passage in its historical/cultural context. 

Very good analysis and appreciation of the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape meaning. 

Ideas are effectively organized, with very good structure, coherence and development. 

Language is clear and carefully chosen, with a good degree of accuracy in grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction; register and style are consistently appropriate to the commentary.

CR

Credit

65 - 74

There is a good understanding of the passage, demonstrated by an interpretation supported by effective references to the passage.

Good situation of the passage in its historical/cultural context. 

Good analysis and appreciation of the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape meaning. 

Ideas are well organized, with a good structure, coherence and development. 

Language is clear and carefully chosen, with an adequate degree of accuracy in grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction despite some lapses; register and style are mostly appropriate to the commentary.

PS

Pass

50 - 64

There is an adequate understanding of the passage, with a superficial attempt at interpretation and some appropriate references to the passage.

Adequate situation of the passage in its historical/cultural context. 

There is some mention, but little analysis or appreciation, of the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape meaning.

Ideas have some organization, with a recognizable structure; coherence and development are often lacking.

Language is sometimes clear and carefully chosen; grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction are fairly accurate, although errors and inconsistencies are apparent; the register and style are to some extent appropriate to the commentary.

FA

Fail

0 - 49

There is basic understanding of the passage but virtually no attempt at interpretation and few references to the passage.

Little attempt to situate the passage in context.

There are few references to, and no analysis or appreciation of, the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape meaning.

Ideas have little organization; there may be a superficial structure, but coherence and
development are lacking.

Language is rarely clear and appropriate; there are many errors in grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction, and little sense of register and style.

Essay criteria

 

Result code

Result name

Mark range

Description

HD

High distinction

85 - 100

Outstanding work, displaying an exceptional degree of originality and creativity and / or exceptional analytical and problem-solving skills. Shows critical understanding of current knowledge, including relevant research papers and reviews.

DI

Distinction

75 - 84

Excellent work displaying a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the subject together with the ability to evaluate critically selected aspects of current knowledge. Evidence of wide reading.

CR

Credit

65 - 74

Shows a good knowledge and understanding of the subject with no major gaps or omissions. Displays ability to analyse, interpret and organise information to produce coherent accounts. Evidence of reading beyond lecture notes and standard texts.

PS

Pass

50 - 64

Shows a satisfactory knowledge and understanding of the essentials of the subject with an ability to integrate information into a clear, well- structured account, but lacking in breadth or depth, or with some significant aspects omitted. Evidence that sources other than lecture notes and set texts have been consulted.

FA

Fail

0 - 49

Knowledge and understanding of the subject are fragmentary, some aspects showing a very basic level of understanding but other aspects displaying fundamental errors and omissions.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction: what, where and when is/was Europe? Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 02 Europe in Antiquity and the Middle Ages Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 03 Renaissance Europe Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 04 Enlightenment Europe from Cantemir to Buffon Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 05 Enlightenment Europe from Voltaire to Burke Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 06 Romantic Europe from Novalis to Guizot Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Romantic Europe from Hegel to Hugo Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 08 Modern Europe from Herzen to Gandhi Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 09 Modern Europe from Lenin to Ramos Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 10 Modern Europe from Krleža to Schirach Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 11 Post-War Europe from Churchill to Brugmans Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 12 Post-War Europe from Gorbachev to Velikonja Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings


Drace-Francis, Alex. European Identity: a Historical Reader. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. understand the diverse ways in which Europe has been conceived historically as a geographic, cultural, political and intellectual entity
  • LO2. analyse how competing ideas of Europe have influenced and been influenced by real-world events
  • LO3. compare, contrast, and contest the ways in which 'Europe' has been understood and framed
  • LO4. develop an in-depth critical commentary on a text dealing with the idea of Europe
  • LO5. demonstrate a thorough grasp of the topic and material by researching for an essay that deals synthetically or comparatively with several perspectives on an aspect of the European idea

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time this unit has run.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.