Skip to main content
Unit of study_

FILM4114: The Cinematic Experience

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

What is the cinematic experience today, in an age of fragmented audiences and multiple platform delivery? Taking the film festival as its central case study, this unit examines the festival as a cultural institution, as a site for the making of film history, and as a scene of the curious mixture of the festive and the cerebral, the sensual and the serious.

Unit details and rules

Unit code FILM4114
Academic unit Art History
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Richard Smith, r.smith@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Presentation Presentation 1
n/a
20% Multiple weeks 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Presentation Presentation 2
n/a
20% Multiple weeks 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Assignment Research essay
n/a
60% Week 12
Due date: 19 Nov 2020 at 23:59
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

 

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 02 Phenomenology Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 03 Affect Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 04 Ethics Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 05 Neuroscience Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 06 Cognitive Science Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Evolutionary Biology Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 08 Textual Analysis Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 09 Attentional Analysis Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 10 Cinephilia Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 11 Film Festivals Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 12 Conclusion Seminar (2 hr) LO3

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.

  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.

  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

FILM4114: THE CINEMATIC EXPERIENCE.  (Film Studies Honours seminar.)

 

READINGS.
week 1 introduction to the unit.

PART 1. PHILOSOPHY (wks 2-4)
week 2

1. A) PHENOMENOLOGY.
Sobchack, Vivian.  “The Scene of the Screen: Envisioning Photographic, Cinematic and Electronic “Presence”.”  135-162.

SUPPLEMENTARY.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice.  “Film and the New Psychology.”  Sense and Non-Sense.  Trans Hubert L. Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus.  Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1964.  

Stephens, Elizabeth.  “Sensation Machine: Film, Phenomenology and the training of the senses.”  Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies. 24. 4 (2012): 529 – 539.

Chammaratte, Jenny.  “Embodied Worlds and Situated Bodies: Feminism, Phenomenology, Film Theory.” Symposium: Politics of the Sensing Body.  Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 40 2 (2015): 289 – 295.

 

week 3

1 B) AFFECT
Rutherford, Anne.  “Cinema and embodied Affect.”  What Makes a Film Tick?  Cinematic affect, Materiality and Mimetic Innervation. Bern Pweter Lang, 2018.  143 – 163.

SUPPLEMENTARY.
Flaxman, Gregory.  “Once More with Feeling: Cinema and Cinesthesia.”  SubStance. 45. 3 (141), 2016: 174-189.

 

week 4
1 C) ETHICS.
Hadjioannu, Markos.  “Tracing and Ethics of the Movie Image.”  From Light to Byte: Toward an Ethics of Digital Cinema.  Minneapolis: Minnesota UP, 2012. 177-209.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY

Gronstadt, Asbjorn.  “The Ethical Turn in Film and Visual Culture: From Content to Form.”  Film and the Ethical Imagination. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.  53 – 73.
Sinnerbrink, Robert.  “Cinematic Ethics: Film as a medium of ethical experience.”  Cinematic Ethics: Exploring Ethical experience through Film.  London: Routledge, 2015.  1 – 22.
Sobchack, Vivian.  “The Passion of the Material: Toward a Phenomenology of Interobjectivity.”  Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture.  Berkley, Los Angeles, London; California UP, 2004. 286 – 318.

 

PART 2 SCIENCE (wks 5-7)

week 5
2 A) NEUROSCIENCE
Gallese, Vittorio, Christian Keysers, Giacomo Rizzolatti.  “A unifying view of the basis of social cognition.”  Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 8. 9 (September 2004): 396 – 404.
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine.  “Movement and mirror neurons: a challenging and choice conversation.”  Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences.  11 (2012): 385 – 401.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY

Pisters, Patricia.  “Synaptic Signals: Time Travelling Through the Brain in the Neuro-Image.”  Deleuze Studies. 5. 2 (2011): 261-74.

Herogenrath, Bernd.  “cinapses: thinking/film – Film, Philosophy and Neuroscience.”  Illuminance. 23. 4 2011: 144-148.

Gallese, Vittorio and Michele Guerra.  “Embodying Movies: Embodied Simulation and Film Studies.”  Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image.  3. (2012): 183-210.

 

week 6
2 B) COGNITIVE SCIENCE
Heimann, Katrin et al.  “’Cuts in action’: A High-Density EEG Study Investigating the Neural Correlates of Different Editing Techniques in Film.”  Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal.  41 (2017): 1555 – 1588.

Shimamura, Arthur P, et al.  “How Attention is Driven by Film Edits: A Multimodal Experience.”  Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts.  9. 4 (2015): 417 – 422.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY

Cohen, Anna-Lisa.  Et al.  “The Power of the Picture: How Narrative Film Captures Attention and Disrupts Goal Pursuit.”  PLoS ONE 10. 12 (2015): 1 – 8. 

 

week 7
2 C) EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Grishakova, Marina and Siim Sorokin.  “Notes on narrative, cognition, and cultural evolution.”  Sign systems Studies. 44. 4 (2016): 542 – 561.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY

Grodal, Torben.  “Introduction to Part II: The PECMA Flow.” And “Stories for eyes, ears and muscles: The Evolution of Embodied Sensations.”  Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009.  145-180.

PART 3: INTERMISSION: THE STUDY OF FILM. wks 8-9
week 8

3 A) TEXTUAL ANALYSIS
Bellour, Raymond.  “System of a Fragment (on The Birds).”  The Analysis of Film.  Ed. Constance Penley.  Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana UP, 2001. 28-69.

SUPPLEMENTARY 
Cahiers editors.  “John Ford’s Young Mr Lincoln: A collective text by the Editors of cahiers du Cinema.”  Screen. 13. 3 (Autumn 1972): 5-44. 
 

week 9
3 B) ATTENTIONAL ANALYSIS
Cutting, James E, et al “Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film.” Psychological Science.  21 (2010): 432-439.

SUPPLEMENTARY
Hasson, Uri. Orit Furman, Dav Clark, et al.  “Enhanced Intersubject Correlations during Movie Viewing Correlate with Successful Episodic Encoding.” Neuron. 57 (February 2008): 452-462.

 

PART 4 CINEPHILIA AND FILM FESTIVALS wks 10 – 12

week 10
4 A) CINEPHILIA

Mulvey Laura.  “Some reflections on the Cinephilia Question.  Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media.  50 1-2 (Spring-fall 2009): 190-193.

Sontag Susan.  “The Decay of Cinema.”  New York Times. Feb 25 1996: 60 – 61.

Barthes, Roland.  “Leaving the Movie Theatre.”  The Rustle of Language. Trans. Richard Howard. Berkley: University of California Press, 1989.  345 – 349.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY

Willemen, Paul.  “Through a Glass Darkly: Cinephilia Reconsidered.”  Looks and Frictions:  Essays in Cultural Studies and Film Theory.  Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana UP, 223-57.

Keathley, Christian.  “The Cinephiliac Moment.”  Cinephilia and History, or the wind in the trees.  Indiana University press, 2006: 


week 11
4 B) FILM FESTIVALS.

de Valck, Marijke. "Cannes and the Alternative Cinema Network: Bridging the Gap between Cultural Criteria and Business Demands ". In Film Festivals: From European Geopolitics to Global Cinephilia. 85-121. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.

Wong, Cindy Hing-Yuk.  “Festivals as Public spheres.”  Film festivals: Culture, People, and Power on the Global Screen.  Rutgers University press 2011.  19 – 189.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY

Wong, Cindy Hing-Yuk. “Publics and Counterpublics: Rethinking Film Festivals as Public Spheres,” 83-99. In Valck, Marijke de, Brendan Kredell, and Skadi Loist. Film Festivals: History, Theory, Method, Practice. London: Routledge, 2016.


week 12. Conclusion.

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. synthesize disparate film concepts from different disciplines and fields of expertise
  • LO2. analyze, critique and ecaluate different critical and theoretical positions and approaches
  • LO3. present complex ideas succinctly and coherently.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9
LO1         
LO2         
LO3         

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

'No changes have been made since this unit was last offered'.

Work, health and safety

This unit will be taught online

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.