Skip to main content
Unit of study_

FILM4114: The Cinematic Experience

Semester 2, 2022 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

What is the cinematic experience today, in an age of fragmented audiences and multiple platform delivery? Taking the film festival as its central case study, this unit examines the festival as a cultural institution, as a site for the making of film history, and as a scene of the curious mixture of the festive and the cerebral, the sensual and the serious.

Unit details and rules

Unit code FILM4114
Academic unit Film Studies
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Susan Potter, susan.potter@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Susan Potter, susan.potter@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Research essay
n/a
60% -
Due date: 13 Nov 2022 at 23:59
4000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Presentation Presentation 1
n/a
20% Multiple weeks 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Presentation Presentation 2
n/a
20% Multiple weeks 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

 

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 02 The cinematic experience now—2gather-a-part co-vid exquisite corpse series Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 03 Excavating cinema’s mobile virtual gaze—Piccadilly (E. A. Dupont, UK, 1929) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 04 Cinematic assemblages—Faces Places (Agnès Varda and JR, France, 2017) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 05 World cinema and the festival—The World (Jia Zhangke, China, 2004) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 06 Queer cinema in the world—Circumstance (Maryam Keshavarz, France/US/Iran, 2011) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Portable cinema—test reels, smartphone media, the Internet Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 08 Microcinema—Hale County This Morning, This Evening (RaMell Ross, US, 2018) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 09 Cinematic milieu—Domitilla I (DAAR Communication, Nigeria, 1996) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 10 Reading week—theses due end of the week Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 11 Cinematic milieu—site visit tba Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 12 Room for play—Toni Erdmann (Maren Ade, Germany, 2016) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 13 Research essay workshop Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.

  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

DETAILED SCHEDULE OF READINGS & FILMS

Note: films and readings are indicative and may be revised.

1 Introduction

No screening. No reading.

2 The cinematic experience now—2gather-a-part co-vid exquisite corpse series (https://vimeo.com/showcase/7024910)

Gaudreault, André, and Philippe Marion. “Chapter One: Cinema Is Not What It Used to Be.” The End of Cinema?: A Medium in Crisis in the Digital Age. The End of Cinema? Columbia University Press, 2015.

Thain, Alanna, and Dayna McLeod. “Cinema’s Missing Bodies.” Framework 62, no. 2 (2021): 223–41. Click on the QR codes in the essay to access all audio files.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Hansen, M. “Early Cinema, Late Cinema: Permutations of the Public Sphere.” Screen 34, no. 3 (1993): 197–210.

Casetti, Francesco. The Lumière Galaxy: Seven Key Words for the Cinema to Come. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

3 Excavating cinema’s mobile virtual gaze—Piccadilly (E. A. Dupont, UK, 1929)

Friedberg, Anne. Chapter One “The mobilized and virtual gaze in modernity: Flâneur/flaneuse,” 15-38, in Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

Friedberg, Anne. Chapter Two “The passage from arcade to cinema,” 47-94, in Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam. “The Imperial Imaginary.” In Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media (London: Routledge, 1994).

“Victorian Popular Culture - Adam Matthew Digital.” Accessed July 13, 2021. https://www-victorianpopularculture-amdigital-co-uk.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au/. See the Quick Link on the home page to the “Optical Entertainments” digital exhibition.

4 Cinematic assemblages—Faces Places (Agnès Varda and JR, France, 2017)

Casetti, Francesco. “Assemblage.” In The Lumière Galaxy: Seven Key Words for the Cinema to Come. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

Martin, Adrian. “Turn the Page: From Mise En Scène to Dispositif.” Screening the Past (2011) https://www.screeningthepast.com/2011/07/turn-the-page-from-mise-en-scene-to-dispositif/

SUPPLEMENTARY

Agamben, Giorgio. “What Is an Apparatus?” In What Is an Apparatus? And Other Essays, 1–24. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009.

5 World cinema and the festival—The World (Jia Zhangke, China, 2004)

Andrew, Dudley. 2009. “Time Zones and Jet Lag: The Flows and Phases of World Cinema.” In World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives, edited by Nataša Durovicová and Kathleen E. Newman. Taylor & Francis.

de Valck, Marijke. “Cannes and the Alternative Cinema Network: Bridging the Gap between Cultural Criteria and Business Demands,” 85-121. In Film Festivals: From European Geopolitics to Global Cinephilia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007. 36pp eBook

SUPPLEMENTARY

Appadurai, Arjun. “Chapter 2: Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy,” 27-47. In Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

La Dolce Vita (Federico Fellini, Italy, 1960)

6 Queer cinema in the world—Circumstance (Maryam Keshavarz, France/US/Iran, 2011)

Schoonover, Karl, and Rosalind Galt. “Introduction.” In Queer Cinema in the World. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.

Schoonover, Karl, and Rosalind Galt. Chapter 2 “A Worldly Affair: Queer Film Festivals and Global Space.” In Queer Cinema in the World. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Robertson, Roland. “Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity.” In Global Modernities, 25–44. Edited by Mike Featherstone, Scott Lash & Roland Robertson. London: SAGE Publications, 1995.

Juhasz, Alexandra, and Ming-Yuen S. Ma. “Queer Media Manifestos.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 19, no. 4 (2013): 559–74. [e-journal]

7 Portable cinema—test reels, smartphone media, the Internet

Wasson, Haidee. “Introduction: Portability and Projectability” and Chapter 4 “Portable Projects and the Electronic Age.” Everyday Movies: Portable Film Projectors and the Transformation of American Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2020.

Knörer, Ekkehard. “Movable Images on Portable Devices.” In Screen Dynamics: Mapping the Borders of Cinema, edited by Gertrud Koch, Volker Pantenburg, and Simon Rothöhler, 169–78. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Pilcher, Lauren. “Queer Theory and Nontheatrical Films: Perversion in the Public Domain.” In The Oxford Handbook of Queer Cinema, edited by Ronald Gregg and Amy Villarejo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.

8 Microcinema—Hale County This Morning, This Evening (RaMell Ross, US, 2018)

Shambu, Girish. “Making a Home for Film, Making Film a Home: The Nomadic Cinephilia of Ruun Nuur.” Framework 62, no. 2 (2021): 199–209.

De Ville, Donna. “The Persistent Transience of Microcinema (in the United States and Canada).” Film History: An International Journal 27, no. 3 (2015): 104–36.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Koyaanisqatsi (Godfrey Reggio, US, 1982).

Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam. “The Politics of Multiculturalism in the Postmodern Age.” In Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media (London: Routledge, 1994).

MID-SEMESTER BREAK

9 Cinematic milieu—Domitilla I (DAAR Communication, Nigeria, 1996) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQZSr92n2Hw

Canguilhem, Georges. (1952) 2001. “The Living and Its Milieu,” translated by John Savage. Grey Room, no. 3: 7–31.

Larkin, Brian. “The Cinematic Milieu.” Public Culture 33, no. 3 (2021): 313–48.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Okome, Onookome. 2007. “Nollywood: Spectatorship, Audience, and the Sites of Consumption.” Postcolonial Text 3, no. 2. https://www.postcolonial.org/index.php/pct/article/viewFile/763/425

Steyerl, Hito. 2009. “In Defense of the Poor Image.” In The Wretched of the Screen, 31–45. Berlin: Sternberg.

10 Reading week—theses due end of the week

11 Cinematic milieu—site visit tba

12 Room for playToni Erdmann (Maren Ade, Germany, 2016)

Hansen, Miriam Bratu. “Room-for-Play: Benjamin’s Gamble with Cinema.” Canadian Journal of Film Studies/Revue Canadienne d’études Cinematographiques 13, no. 1 (2004): 2–27.

Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility [Second Version].” In The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media, edited by Michael W. Jennings, Brigid Doherty, and Thomas Y. Levin, translated by Edmund Jephcott, 19–55. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.

13 Research essay workshop

 

 

 

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. synthesize disparate film concepts from different disciplines and fields of expertise
  • LO2. analyze, critique and ecaluate different critical and theoretical positions and approaches
  • LO3. present complex ideas succinctly and coherently.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Topic content has been revised.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.