Skip to main content
Unit of study_

GCST6923: Dissertation Part 2

Semester 2, 2021 [Supervision] - Remote

Research and writing towards a dissertation of 15,000 words on an approved topic, under the supervision of an academic member of staff. Prospective candidates should consult the postgraduate coordinator prior to enrolment, in order to formulate a topic. Enrolment requires approval.

Unit details and rules

Unit code GCST6923
Academic unit Gender and Cultural Studies
Credit points 12
Prohibitions
? 
WMST6923
Prerequisites
? 
GCST6922
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Shawna Tang, shawna.tang@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Dissertation Dissertation
100% - 15,000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2

Assessment summary

Completion of a 15,000 word dissertation. This constitutes the capstone of the learning experience of the MCS, and prepares the student for possible higher degree research. It demonstrates the student's ability to think creatively, and to design and carry through an entire original research project.

ASSESSMENT DETAILS

Word limit - The guide for master’s theses is 15,000 words (plus or minus 10% is acceptable).

Deadline – Contact Dr Shawna Tang for up-to-date deadlines. You may also submit at a time earlier than the due dates by arrangement, for instance if you need to receive your marks by a certain date. The examination process takes approximately 1 month.

Submission – All MCS theses need to be submitted electronically via the MCS Dissertation elearning site. No hard copy is required.

Style guide – The dissertation should make consistent use of one recognised bibliographic style, preferably MLA or Harvard (author/date), with in-text referencing and a list of works cited at the end of the dissertation. Further guidance can be found in the GCS Style Manual.

Extensions - All requests for an extension to the final dissertation submission deadline must be addressed to the unit co-ordinator, not your supervisor. This is done through the University’s online Special Consideration site. Information with a link to the online application can be found here: http://sydney.edu.au/arts/current_students/online_application.shtml

Your supervisor should be made aware of the situation, and any extension granted. Extensions will only be granted when verifiable exceptional circumstances other than your academic workload have diminished your ability to study.

The examination process - Your thesis will be marked by two members of academic staff in the Department of Gender and Cultural Studies, other than your supervisor. After moderation a final mark will be agreed. In cases where the dissertation is considered not to conform to adequate standards of presentation, bibliographic style or language the markers may require that you revise and resubmit it before a pass can be confirmed. However, this will not lead to re-marking. The mark from the originally submitted version will stand.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
- Department of Gender and Cultural Studies Academic Skills Workshops – The Department runs an annual series of short skills workshops open to all postgraduate and honours students. Students enrolled in the MCS dissertation must attend at least 4 of these over their candidature. Details of sessions are circulated on the GCS email list. Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 02 Supervision meeting One-to-one tuition (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 04 Supervision meeting One-to-one tuition (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 06 Supervision meeting One-to-one tuition (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 08 Supervision meeting One-to-one tuition (1 hr) LO1 LO2

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. plan and execute an independent research project
  • LO2. communicate your research for a scholarly audience.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered

GCST6922, Dissertation 1 and GCST6923, Dissertation 2 are departmental approval units. In order to apply for them, your proposal needs to be sent to the Postgraduate Coursework Coordinator (who is also coordinator of the units), who will determine whether your project is feasible and can be supervised within the Department of Gender and Cultural Studies. The proposal form is available on the PG coursework e-community site on elearning. Alternatively, contact Dr Shawna Tang by email to get it: shawna.tang@sydney.edu.au. GCST6922 and GCST6923 are normally taken in consecutive semesters but can on by special permission be taken together.

 

Supervision - Your supervisor will provide guidance about the processes of defining, developing and writing up your project. As the investigator/author you are responsible for undertaking research and generating the ideas you present to your supervisor for their feedback. Any final decisions about your work are yours to make. Think of your supervisor as an educated interlocutor rather than an instructor. Their role is ultimately advisory and you need to be proactive in producing work, setting goals and letting them know what guidance you require.

You need to agree how the time your supervisor has available for your supervision is used for meetings, reading work, and email correspondence, in a pattern that suits you both. You should meet regularly, and early on you should come to an understanding about how frequently. This could vary depending on the periods when you may need more support (e.g. writing up), or when one of you is more or less available. Note that supervisors may be away or on leave for periods of time and you need to plan around this, especially regarding feedback prior to submission.

Please refer to the Faculty Code of Practice for Supervision of Masters Dissertations.

Department of Gender and Cultural Studies Academic Skills Workshops – The Department runs an annual series of short skills workshops open to all postgraduate and honours students. Students enrolled in the MCS dissertation must attend at least 4 of these over their candidature. Details of sessions are circulated on the GCS email list.

Ethics approval – Some dissertation research projects involving research with humans will require approval by the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). If you are doing fieldwork (such as surveys, interviews or ethnography) your supervisor will advise and help you to apply. See: http://sydney.edu.au/research_support/ethics/human/ The committee aims to have a fast turnaround for student projects. Projects that do not involve complex or sensitive forms of research may be approved in one meeting of the committee, or if minor queries or modifications arise these applications can often be approved over two meetings. Meeting dates are listed here: http://sydney.edu.au/research_support/ethics/human/deadlines.shtml

Postgraduate Coursework Thesis Library – Selected previous Master of Cultural Studies dissertations are available for viewing and short term borrowing.

The Quarter (https://news.library.sydney.edu.au/the-quarter-has-opened/) is a PG coursework only study area.

Time management - Dissertations require you to work independently. It is therefore important to plan your time. Create a schedule that is adapted to other demands on your time and block out the periods necessary to complete goals you have set. Always ensure you have something to work on. For instance, if you have sent something for your supervisor to read, and are waiting for feedback or a chance to discuss it, make sure you have another task in the meantime.

Discuss your timeline for achieving goals—such as when you plan to complete data collection/analysis, individual chapters, or the first draft—with your supervisor. While each project will vary, it is generally advisable to start writing earlier rather than later, so that you can then spend more time revising and editing. If you have agreed with your supervisor that they will read some of your work, establish when they will be able to do so, and how much time they need to read it. Don’t forget you will also need to leave time to revise your work in response to feedback.

 

 

General philosophies of assessment practice

Departments within the School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry follow Academic Board and Faculty of Arts guidelines in awarding a determined percentage of each grade.

  1. The School favours ‘deep learning’ over ‘shallow learning’. In other words, we are more interested in evidence that students have made conceptual developments in their ways of understanding and interpreting the world than in their familiarity with 'facts', figures and dates.
  2. Original and thoughtful argument is valued more highly than polished regurgitations of lectures or set reading.
  3. Evidence of a thoughtful response to the conceptual framework of any individual unit is valued more highly than pre-existing skills of, for example, debate and expression.
  4. Students are encouraged to explore areas of particular interest to themselves, and will be rewarded for initiative and ingenuity in discovering relevant material.
  5. An idea that cannot be expressed clearly probably has not been understood clearly. We therefore value evidence of logical, coherent thought, argument and expression in essays.
  6. While recognising that the political and ethical values of students vary widely, the School does not reward or condone unreasoned polemic or racism or sexism.
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR SUPERVISION OF MASTERS DISSERTATIONS

(endorsed by Faculty Board 9 August 2010)

 

The Masters Dissertation is a distinctive feature of the Masters Coursework enabling students with a distinction average on graduation to be considered for enrolment in Higher Degree Research, such as the MA by Research, the M.Phil and Ph.D. Enrolment in Dissertation Units is subject to Department Permission. This document explains the basic responsibilities of students writing dissertations, their supervisors, and the programs in which the research is being undertaken.

 

I.Responsibilities of the Department or Program

These responsibilities are those of the Chair of Department, or Director of the Postgraduate Coursework Program into which the units fall. In many departments, however, some or all of these responsibilities are delegated to a Masters Dissertation Unit Coordinator. Such delegations should be explained clearly to students.

 

Departments and programs are responsible for:

  • ensuring that applicants for admission to Masters Dissertation are properly qualified both with respect to the minimum requirements for admission to the degree concerned and with respect to the particular research topic proposed
  • ensuring that the project proposed is appropriate for a Masters Dissertation and that it can be undertaken with the time and facilities available
  • ensuring that the candidate receives proper supervision throughout the period during which the dissertation is researched and written
  • ensuring that the examination process maintains the standards required for a Masters Dissertation, is expeditious, and is consistent with relevant Faculty of Arts and Academic Board policies
  • informing students of the rules and conventions relating to the length, presentation, production and submission of the dissertation
  • encouraging supervisors to participate in supervision training activities provided within the university
  • ensuring that opportunities exist within the department for the development of profitable intellectual relationships among Masters Dissertation students and with staff and that all students are encouraged to participate in appropriate departmental, school, or faculty activities
  • informing students whose research methods (including questionnaires and interviews) raise ethical matters about the requirements of the University’s Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), and ensuring that supervisors know how to help their students prepare an application to the Ethics Committee.

 

  • monitoring the student-supervisor relationship and working to resolve any problems with it
  • making Masters Dissertation students aware of people within the department or program, the faculty, and the wider university to whom they can turn for advice
  • ensuring that students and supervisors are aware of the university’s policies and procedures with respect to intellectual property, including questions of authorship and exploitation of inventions and other intellectual property.

 

Departments and programs supervising Joint Masters Dissertations should maintain close contact with the student to ensure that expectations are met.

 

II. Responsibilities of the Supervisor

Supervisors must:

  • ensure that the student is aware of the standards expected for a Masters Dissertation
  • identify with the student the particular research methods and analytical skills that will need to be developed and recommend enrolling in relevant methodology coursework units
  • negotiate with the student a plan for the researching and writing of the dissertation, which may include a deadline for submitting a complete draft, arrangements for supervision meetings, and so on
  • make themselves available to meet with a dissertation student for half an hour every two weeks, on average, during semester; meetings may be shorter or less frequent while the student is concentrating on coursework, and longer or more frequent in the later stages of the dissertation
  • at the discretion of the supervisor, meetings may be scheduled during semester breaks, however, this is not a requirement
  • return written work with constructive criticism within three weeks or a shorter agreed time
  • provide the student with feedback on progress, identify any problems, and suggest ways of addressing them
  • keep the Chair of Department, Postgraduate Coursework Coordinator, or Masters Dissertation Unit Coordinator informed of any problems that occur during the researching and writing of the dissertation
  • provide appropriate and timely advice on requirements regarding content, style, presentation and production of the dissertation
  • work with the student in preparing an application to the the University’s Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) if the dissertation research involves human subjects or for any other reason requires consideration by the Ethics Committee
  • be aware of the support services for students which exist within the University.

 

III. Responsibilities of the Student

The student:

  • is solely responsible for the content, style, presentation and production of the dissertation that is finally presented
  • is expected to devote at least 8 to 10 hours per week during semester to researching and writing the dissertation
  • must ensure that there is sufficient time allocated to write up the dissertation and to ascertain what is necessary in terms of content, style and presentation
  • should negotiate with the supervisor a plan for the researching and writing of the dissertation, which may include details of a deadline for submitting a complete draft, arrangements for supervision meetings, and so on
  • should draw the attention of the supervisor, Chair of Department, Postgraduate Coursework Coordinator or Masters Dissertation Unit Coordinator to difficulties being experienced
  • must be familiar with any departmental, faculty or other university written rules or guidelines relating to Masters Dissertation including ethics requirements for research with human subjects
  • must work with the supervisor in preparing an application to the he University’s Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) if the dissertation research involves human subjects or for any other reason requires consideration by the Ethics Committee. Further details are at: http://sydney.edu.au/research_support/ethics/human/committee.shtml

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.