Skip to main content
Unit of study_

GEOS3053: Asia-Pacific Field School

Intensive July, 2023 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The unit of study uses classroom and field-based learning to introduce students to the application of geographical concepts and methods to environmental and development problems in Asia-Pacific countries. The location and timing of this unit may change from year to year in accordance with the availability of lecturers and climatic considerations. In 2019, it will be run over two to three weeks in February, in India. This unit can be taken only with prior permission from the unit of study coordinator, and involves mandatory attendance at pre-departure briefings. You will learn skills and knowledge about: (1) India's environmental and development challenges at a national scale (2) processes of rural social, environmental and economic change; (3) the challenges of sustainable urbanisation; (4) social transformations in India, specifically relating to gender, migration and mobility, and class. The unit is conducted in partnership with pre-eminent Indian universities, who provide guest lectures as appropriate in addition to those by the unit of study coordinator. The unit will also expose students to civil society groups working on issues of geo-political, economic and environmental importance. By doing this unit you will develop skills and knowledge that are highly relevant to research and careers in the Asia-Pacific.

Unit details and rules

Unit code GEOS3053
Academic unit Geosciences Academic Operations
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
GEOG3201 or GEOS3953
Prerequisites
? 
GEOS2X21 or AREC2005 or GOVT2228 or GEOS2X11 or GEOS2X23 or GEOS2X16
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Jeffrey Neilson, jeffrey.neilson@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Small continuous assessment Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bibliography
20% Multiple weeks 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3
Small continuous assessment Weekly reflection diary 1
Weekly reflection diary 1
10% Multiple weeks 750 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Small continuous assessment Weekly reflection diary 2
Weekly reflection diary 2
10% Multiple weeks 750 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Small continuous assessment Group research presentation
Group research presentation
20% Multiple weeks 20 minutes per group
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Small continuous assessment Essay
Individual Essay
30% Multiple weeks 2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Participation Participation
Participation
10% Ongoing Ongoing
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4

Assessment summary

  • Annotated Bibliography: Students will be required to submit an annotated bibliography on three academic and/or policy-related readings related to the theme of the field school. This will be done prior to field school commencement to ensure the student has undertaken some preliminary research. Students must choose one reading from the assigned readings, and another two readings that have been sourced independently. Each of the three annotations should be about 350 words in length (the first paragraph of about 175 words should summarise the reading, the second paragraph of about 175 words should analyse and assess the reading), for a total of 1000 words. There is a sample annotated bibliography in Canvas – please ensure you review this before starting the assessment.
  • Weekly Diary: Each week, students must submit approximately 750 words of polished reflections on field school content, process, challenges and / or key learnings.
  • Group Presentation: Each multidisciplinary group will deliver a 20 minute presentation. Students will be graded based on the following criteria:   
    • Clearly articulated research topic with explanation of significance and relevant context
    • Information and research presented is relevant and addresses the research topic
    • The presentation was well structured, the sections of the presentation linked to each other
    • The presentation delivery was clear and accessible and PowerPoint was used appropriately (if used). Presentation completed in time
    • Each group member was engaged in the presentation and able to answer questions
    • Appropriate and clear answers were given to questions
  • Participation: Field school leaders will allocate a participation mark that rewards students on the basis of their intellectual energy and enthusiasm.
  • Individual essay: Following the conclusion of the field school, students must submit an essay that addresses the same research question posed during their group presentation. Unlike the group presentation, which is multidisciplinary in nature, the essay should be answered from the student's own disicplinary perspective. If students wish to change their essay question, they must discuss and confirm their essay question with their field school leader before the final day of the Program. Students are expected to include a minimum of 5 academic sources and a complete bibliography using the Chicago referencing style.

Detailed information for each assessment, including due dates and submission instructions, can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

To be awarded to students who, in their performance in assessment tasks, demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an exceptional standard as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars established by the faculty. 

Distinction

75 - 84

To be awarded to students who, in their performance in assessment tasks, demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a very high standard as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars established by the faculty. 

Credit

65 - 74

To be awarded to students who, in their performance in assessment tasks, demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a good standard as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars established by the faculty.

Pass

50 - 64

To be awarded to students who, in their performance in assessment tasks, demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars established by the faculty. 

Fail

0 - 49

To be awarded to students who, in their performance in assessment tasks, fail to demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard established by the faculty.  This grade, with corresponding mark, should also be used in cases where a student fails to achieve a mandated standard in a compulsory assessment, thereby failing to demonstrate the learning outcomes to a satisfactory standard.  In such cases the student will receive the mark awarded by the faculty up to a maximum of 49.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Demonstrate familiarity with key aspects of the Southeast Asian region, including its cultures, history and geography and its political and economic systems
  • LO2. Demonstrate the ability to draw on insights provided by a range of disciplines when analysing complex real-world problems in a Southeast Asian context
  • LO3. Present evidence-based arguments in academic and policy genres
  • LO4. Work in interdisciplinary groups to understand and deconstruct complex social issues

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Changes have been made to the assessments in order to address issues and concerns raised by students in earlier UoS surveys.

Work, health and safety

We are governed by the Work Health and Safety Act 2011, Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 and Codes of Practice. Penalties for non-compliance have increased. Everyone has a responsibility for health and safety at work. The University’s Work Health and Safety policy explains the responsibilities and expectations of workers and others, and the procedures for managing WHS risks associated with University activities.

General Laboratory Safety Rules

  • No eating or drinking is allowed in any laboratory under any circumstances
  • A laboratory coat and closed-toe shoes are mandatory
  • Follow safety instructions in your manual and posted in laboratories
  • In case of fire, follow instructions posted outside the laboratory door
  • First aid kits, eye wash and fire extinguishers are located in or immediately outside each laboratory
  • As a precautionary measure, it is recommended that you have a current tetanus immunisation. This can be obtained from University Health Service: unihealth.usyd.edu.au/

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.