Skip to main content
Unit of study_

HPSC4888: HPS Advanced Project

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

HPS investigates the nature of science in general; what distinguishes scientific activity; how theories explain; how they are confirmed; whether they should be read literally; and the moral dilemmas raised by the sciences. We also investigate the fundamental concepts of individual sciences and how they bear on ancient philosophical questions. History and philosophy of science is distinctive in integrating these two areas of study, with investigations in each area often closely interwoven. The purpose of this unit of study is to give students a more advanced understanding of both history of science and philosophy of science and to improve your skills in writing, argument and analysis. You will identify and develop a research project in which you will apply methodological knowledge gathered during your previous studies to synthesize history and philosophy of science. The historical part will arise through your researching of some episode in history of science that both interests you and promises to interact in an interesting way with a philosophical topic of interest to you. You will present your results before your classmates and also deliver an extended written assignemnt. Learning how present material verbally and in written form is an essential skill for scholars in HPS as well as in the wider workplace.

Unit details and rules

Unit code HPSC4888
Academic unit History and Philosophy of Science Academic Operations
Credit points 12
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
144 credit points of units of study including 12cp of HPSC3XXX or HSTY3XXX or PHIL3XXX
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

Major or Minor in History and Philosophy of Science

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Dominic Murphy, dominic.murphy@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Presentation Exit interview
Oral presentation
0% Formal exam period 10 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO5 LO4
Assignment Final essay
Written essay
50% Formal exam period 4000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Presentation Project proposal
Oral presentation
10% Week 06 15 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Assignment Project written proposal
Written task
15% Week 06 700 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO1 LO6
Presentation Final presentation
Oral presentation
25% Week 12 25 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Research project, involving preliminary proposal and presentation, followed by final paper and oral presentation

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

At HD level, a student demonstrates a flair for the subject as well as a detailed and comprehensive understanding of the unit material. A ‘High Distinction’ reflects exceptional achievement and is awarded to a student who demonstrates the ability to apply their subject knowledge and understanding to produce original solutions for novel or highly complex problems and/or comprehensive critical discussions of theoretical concepts.

Distinction

75 - 84

At DI level, a student demonstrates an aptitude for the subject and a well-developed understanding of the unit material. A ‘Distinction’ reflects excellent achievement and is awarded to a student who demonstrates an ability to apply their subject knowledge and understanding of the subject to produce good solutions for challenging problems and/or a reasonably well-developed critical analysis of theoretical concepts.

Credit

65 - 74

At CR level, a student demonstrates a good command and knowledge of the unit material. A ‘Credit’ reflects solid achievement and is awarded to a student who has a broad general understanding of the unit material and can solve routine problems and/or identify and superficially discuss theoretical concepts.

Pass

50 - 64

At PS level, a student demonstrates proficiency in the unit material. A ‘Pass’ reflects satisfactory achievement and is awarded to a student who has threshold knowledge.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

5% per working day for maximum of ten days

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Multiple weeks Final presentation (weeks 12-13) Seminar (4 hr)  
Week 04 Proposal presentation Seminar (2 hr)  
Weekly Weekly seminars Seminar (2 hr)  

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

To be determined by coordinator in consultation with students

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Identify and describe the contours and significance of a chosen History and Philosophy of Science problem.
  • LO2. ​Formulate a clear argument according to disciplinary standards, identify and evaluate evidence in support of this argument, and reach a defensible and significant conclusion that advances scholarly debate.
  • LO3. Present, defend, and critique the thoughts of the self and others, both orally and in writing.
  • LO4. Receive and respond to criticism, justify methodological choices, and responsibly evaluate the work of others.
  • LO5. ​Work and communicate collaboratively and effectively, both orally and in writing.
  • LO6. Articulate relevant diversity in human experience and differences in policital, economic, social, and cultural processes.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time this unit has been offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.