Skip to main content
Unit outline_

IBUS6005: Ethical International Business Decisions

Semester 1, 2020 [Normal evening] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

In order to succeed in international business, both corporations and individuals need broad decision-making abilities. Business decision-making tools yield more coherent and justifiable results when used with an understanding of the ethical, social and environmental aspects of the process. This applies to various situations in the international business setting including business relations with government, customers, employees, and NGOs. This unit is designed to look at these non-financial elements in the decisions made within the international business context. Upon completion of this unit, students will have enhanced skills and knowledge relevant to the understanding of ethical issues and ethical decisions making in international business organisations.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit International Business
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Jacqueline Mees-Buss, jacqueline.mees-buss@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Final exam Final exam
Written exam
30% Formal exam period 2 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO6 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment group assignment Team case studies
Case study
10% Multiple weeks 2 x 3 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Participation Class participation
Class attendance and participation in discussions, and cases
10% Ongoing Ongoing
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO6 LO5
Assignment Reflective journal 1
Reflection
10% Week 06
Due date: 05 Apr 2020 at 23:00

Closing date: 12 Apr 2020
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO4 LO6
Assignment Newspaper analysis
Opinion piece
30% Week 10
Due date: 10 May 2020 at 23:00

Closing date: 17 May 2020
1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO6 LO4
Assignment Reflective journal 2
Reflection
10% Week 12
Due date: 24 May 2020 at 23:00

Closing date: 31 May 2020
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO4 LO6
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • Team case studies: In groups of 5, students will be presented with cases to be solved in a workshop session during the class or tutorial. Each case will have a set of questions with regards to the ethical challenges presented in the case. Teams will need to upload their responses at the end of the class. Cases in week 4 and week 7 will be marked (these weeks may be subject to change).
  • Class participation: Ethical reasoning and decision-making needs practice in a diverse environment. Therefore, participation in class-discussions, quizzes, games, cases and polls is a critical part of this unit. Students are expected to attend and participate in a minimum of 8 out of 10 classes.
  • Reflective journals 1 and 2: The reflective journal is a self-reflection on what students have learned during the semester; how their knowledge and understanding of moral reasoning in general and in international business in particular has evolved; which particlar theories and/or cases have impacted them the most and why; and what they see as the greatest moral challenges facing international business in the future and therefore what they see as the most valuable lesson(s) they will take into the future
  • Newspaper analysis: Based on a newspaper article provided in class, students will analyse the issues raised in the article. The article will be related to an actual topic of debate affecting the international business community. Students are to write a short opinion piece on the ethical issue(s) presented in (or related to issues raised in) the article. Students are required to address the issue(s) from multiple perspectives to present a convincing point-of-view.
  • Final exam: The final exam is designed to test the students' in-depth understanding and ability to apply all unit content to real cases. It will be a closed book exam consisting of open questions based on two or three short case studies.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an exceptional standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school. 

Distinction

75 - 84

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a very high standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Credit

65 - 74

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a good standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Pass

50 - 64

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school. 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to business ethics: absolutism, relativism and pluralism Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 02 Schools of thought: consequentialism Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 03 Schools of thought: deontology Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 04 Schools of thought: virtue ethics Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 05 Situational analysis and stakeholder theory Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 06 Social justice and corporate social responsibility Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 07 Beyond Shared Value: 3 types of moral challenges Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 08 Distributive justice: free or fair trade? Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 09 Contractarianism and international marketing Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 10 Ethics in international finance and accounting: truth, wealth, growth and taxation Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 11 Ethics in human resource (HR) management: the good or the fair workplace? Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 12 Ethics in technology and innovation Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 13 Complex systems thinking to build a better future Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance and participation: An important part of studying ethics is to discuss complex cases in a group of people with differing opinions. Participation in in-class case studies represents 10% of the total mark. Students are expected to attend and participate in all lectures and tutorials.
  • Lecture recordings: Although some lectures may be recorded the Business School does not own the system and cannot guarantee that the system will operate or that every class will be recorded.

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

There is no prescribed textbook for this unit. A link to the weekly readings can be found on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. identify and analyse ethical dilemmas in international business contexts
  • LO2. use effectively a broad range of analytical, critical, creative, and system-thinking skills to make moral decisions when confronted with ethical dilemmas
  • LO3. theorise towards reasoned solutions to ethical questions in international business settings
  • LO4. communicate a point of view on ethical dilemmas both orally and in writing to a professional standard
  • LO5. work collaboratively within small teams and manage the dynamics within these teams
  • LO6. discuss constructively ethical dilemmas with people from diverse backgrounds with inclusiveness, open-mindedness, and integrity.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered.

More information can be found on Canvas.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.