Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ICLS2200: Language, Culture and Translatability

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit explores issues of translatability, of moving between languages at a range of levels from words to discourse. It equips students to use language learning as a window on cultural concepts, and to develop communicative competence in their target language.

Unit details and rules

Unit code ICLS2200
Academic unit International Comparative Literature and Translation Studies
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
ICLS1200
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Brangwen Stone, brangwen.stone@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Research Project
40% Formal exam period
Due date: 26 Nov 2021 at 23:59
2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Presentation Presentation
25% Multiple weeks 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Discussion Forum Posts
12% Multiple weeks 4 x 150 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Discussion Forum Responses
8% Multiple weeks 4 x 100 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Assignment
15% Week 08
Due date: 08 Oct 2021 at 23:59
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

1x1000wd written assignment (15%), 1x2500wd research project (40%), 1x1500wd equivalent presentation (25%), 4x150wd online discussion forum posts (12%), 4x100wd discussion forum responses to other posts (8%)

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Translation reads idiomatically as if it were produced in the target language. Concepts encountered during the unit are used with sophistication in the commentary, which should reflect in depth on both strategic decisions and decisions of detail. The glossary is complete and contains appropriate entries. 

Distinction

75 - 84

Translation is accurate, idiomatic, free from inaccuracies and/or mistranslations, and demonstrates style in the use of English. Concepts encountered during the unit are used correctly in the commentary, which should reflect in depth on both strategic decisions and decisions of detail. The glossary is complete and contains appropriate entries. 

Credit

65 - 74

Translation is accurate and idiomatic without any major inaccuracies and/or mistranslations. Concepts encountered during the unit are used correctly in the commentary, which should reflect well on both strategic decisions and decisions of detail. The glossary is complete and contains appropriate entries. 

Pass

50 - 64

Translation is broadly accurate but may contain occasional inaccuracies and/or mistranslations. Concepts encountered during the unit are used correctly, though the commentary may lack an appropriate level of depth or reflection. The glossary is complete and contains appropriate entries. 

Fail

0 - 49

Translation may suffer from serious inaccuracies and/or mistranslations. Concepts encountered during the unit may be used insufficiently or are misused in the commentary. The glossary may be incomplete and/or contain inappropriate or irrelevant entries. 

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The Assessment Procedures 2011 provide that any written work submitted after 11:59pm on the due date will be penalised by 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date. If the assessment is submitted more than ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Readings will be provided on “Reading List” via Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. apply key concepts and approaches used in investigating issues of translatability between languages.
  • LO2. demonstrate the ability to engage critically with the link between cultural concepts and your communicative competence in the language you are learning.
  • LO3. employ appropriate media, tools and methodologies to locate, access, and use information.
  • LO4. demonstrate the capacity to respond persuasively to the claims of other scholars on the basis of appropriate evidence.
  • LO5. recognize social, cultural and linguistic diversity in Australia and the world.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit is being taught for the first time.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.