Skip to main content
Unit of study_

INLI1002: Indigenous Literacies in Academic Contexts B

Semester 2, 2022 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

A focus on persuasive and critical thinking and communication informs students' writing practise in this unit of study building upon the descriptive and analytical thinking skills developed in Indigenous Literacies in Academic Contexts A. Students will be introduced to research and digital literacy strategies while investigating topics of value to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and will learn how to locate and select ideas in appropriate academic sources and use those ideas effectively. Students will learn how to recognise diverse positions in their readings and to use evidence to develop and support their own positions in the development of persuasive essays or science reports. Students will examine ideas of attribution and collective and individual ownership of knowledge including the concept of Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property and be encouraged to develop a critical approach to knowledge representation. The concept of cultural safety within a range of contexts and processes will be explored. Visiting culturally relevant, contemporary sites and responding to a range of views presented by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander lecturers and speakers will support learning in this unit of study.

Unit details and rules

Unit code INLI1002
Academic unit Indigenous Academic Units
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Christine Evans, christine.evans@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Assessment Task 1: Persuasive essay or science report reference list with rationale
Reference list and rationale, including evidence of peer feedback
25% Week 04
Due date: 28 Aug 2022 at 23:59

Closing date: 16 Dec 2022
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO6 LO7
Assignment Assessment Task 2: Oral presentation of key points and evidence using draft persuasive essay or draft science report
Oral presentation of key points and evidence
35% Week 07
Due date: 14 Sep 2022 at 23:59

Closing date: 16 Dec 2022
3 minutes/ 6-8 slides
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Assessment Task 3: Persuasive essay or scientific report
Persuasive essay or science report
40% Week 13
Due date: 06 Nov 2022 at 23:59

Closing date: 18 Dec 2022
1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6 LO7

Assessment summary

  • 1000 word persuasive essay or science report reference list (approx. 500 words) with rationale (approx. 500 words) (25%)
  • 3 minute oral presentation of key points and evidence using the draft persuasive essay or draft science report (including 6-8 PowerPoint slides) (35%)
  • 1500 word persuasive essay or science report (40%)

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

Result name    Mark range        Description
High distinction 85 - 100
  • Consistently strong and ongoing demonstration and evidence of superior organisational and conceptual skills. The work is extremely well-conceived, coherent, logical and original as well as professionally prepared.
  • Evidence of cultural responsiveness in communication that is consistent and innovative.
  • Convincing synthesis of evidence, critical analysis and understanding of multiple perspectives to formulate a coherent argument.
  • Scholarly critique of a diverse array of literature. Generates, develops, uses and justifies own ideas or original concepts based on a wide range of relevant sources.
Distinction 75 - 84
  • Consistently strong and ongoing demonstration and evidence of superior organisational and conceptual skills. The work is extremely well-conceived, coherent, logical, original and lucid as well as professionally prepared.
  • Evidence of cultural responsiveness in communication that is consistent or innovative.
  • Convincing synthesis of evidence, critical analysis and understanding of multiple perspectives to formulate a coherent argument.
  • Scholarly critique of a diverse array of literature. Generates, develops, uses and justifies own ideas or original concepts based on a wide range of relevant sources.
Credit 65 - 74
  • Strong organizational & conceptual skills and evidence that the task is logical and coherent and professionally prepared.
  • Evidence of cultural responsiveness in communication that is of a good standard and is consistent.
  • Credible argument making relevant use of evidence, analysis and understanding. Able to apply concepts and draw and justify conclusions.
  • Substantial critical appraisal of the relevant literature to develop own ideas.
Pass  50 - 64
  • Demonstrates task organization and conceptual understanding in a style which is mostly logical, coherent and flowing.
  • Evidence of cultural responsiveness in communication is sound and of the anticipated standard
  • Demonstrates some evidence of analytical and evaluative skills. Able to apply fundamental concepts and draw and justify conclusions.
  • Evidence of critical appraisal of literature, with a recognition of different perspectives.

 

Fail

 

0-49      

  • Attempts are made to demonstrate a logical and coherent understanding of the assessment task, but some aspects may be  undeveloped.
  • Evidence of cultural responsiveness in communication is less than the anticipated standard.
  • Little or no evidence of analytical and evaluative skills. Fails to draw on fundamental concepts and to justify conclusions.
  • Very little evidence of basic skills for problem-solving and addressing key assessment tasks.
  • Literature is presented uncritically and in a purely descriptive way.

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date: Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date. After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Block 1/ Topic 1: Acknowledgement of Country. Unit of Study overview. Guest speaker or panel. Block teaching (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO7
Block 1/Topic 2: Worldviews: working productively in discipline-based contexts from a range of standpoints, commencing with those of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Block teaching (1 hr) LO5 LO6
Block 1/ Topic 3: Incorporating sources of information about Indigenous knowledge using academic conventions. Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO7
Block 1/Topic 4: Online learning and academic integrity, paraphrasing and referencing practices. Block teaching (1 hr) LO2
Block 1/Topic 5: Academic writing: styles and persuasive writing. Block teaching (1 hr) LO7
Week 07 Block 2/ Topic 1: Academic writing; feedback, practice and development. Block teaching (1 hr) LO7
Block 2/Topic 2: Essay and Reports: Exploring diversity in academic writing genres across faculties and disciplines. Block teaching (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO7
Block 2/Topic 3: Persuasive Essays and Science Reports. Block teaching (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO7
Block 2/ Topic 4: Oral presentation of key points and evidence using the draft persuasive essay or draft science report. Block teaching (1 hr) LO7
Week 13 Block 3/Topic 1: Reflecting on cultural safety. Block teaching (3 hr) LO5 LO6
Block 3/Topic 2: Academic writing: getting the message across. Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Block 3/ Task 3: Persuasive essay or science report. Unit of study evaluation. Block teaching (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Locate relevant databases for research purposes and identify source materials relevant to discipline context and assignment tasks
  • LO2. Understand what ‘academic integrity’ means in the university context, how referencing practices reflect this cultural approach to knowledge sharing and help avoid plagiarism
  • LO3. Identify and critically evaluate positions, arguments and evidence in academic and other relevant sources.
  • LO4. Develop one’s own position and arguments and learn how to incorporate evidence in academic essays and reports.
  • LO5. Explore one’s own perspectives, and deepen an understanding of critical self-reflection, including recognizing the lens of one’s own worldview and viewpoint.
  • LO6. Explore approaches to culture and knowledge construction from Indigenous and Western perspectives.
  • LO7. Communicate information, or arguments for a range of purposes, and using a variety of modes, to a range of audiences.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time this unit has been offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.