Skip to main content
Unit of study_

JAZZ3030: Jazz Pedagogy

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Sydney

This unit of study is designed to provide students with knowledge about educational approaches and strategies for teaching jazz to individuals and small and large groups. Topics will include current best practice teaching principles and techniques, approaches to teaching jazz articulation, improvisation, and style; performance practices for large and small jazz ensemble including set up regarding WH and S; and jazz resources for teaching.

Unit details and rules

Unit code JAZZ3030
Academic unit Jazz
Credit points 3
Prohibitions
? 
JAZZ1661
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Jason Isaac, jason.isaac@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Weekly Reflective Statements
Failure to submit any weekly statement on time will result in 0%
10% - 30-60 minutes / 1- 2 paragraphs
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Portfolio of Pedagogical Philosophy
End of Semester Assessment
40% STUVAC
Due date: 27 Nov 2020 at 17:00
1500 Words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Creative assessment / demonstration Practical Teaching Assessment
Demonstration of developing ensemble teaching abilities
25% Week 10 1-2 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO7 LO5 LO3
Online task In Class Assessment
Final assessment demonstrating understanding of semester's content
25% Week 13 60 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

  • End Of Semester Exam

Final exam at completion of semester to demonstrate understanding of pedagogical theory, teaching skills and techniques relevant to directing jazz ensembles and/or private tuition.

  • Practical Teaching Assessment

A practical offsite assessment of a student’s ability to conduct and rehearse a local High School or Primary School level Big Band.

  • Weekly Reflective Statements

Each Friday, a one paragraph statement of pedagogical reflection is set, to be completed by Wednesday the following week.

Failure to submit any of these reflective statements on time will result in 0% for this component of the final semester mark.

 

  • Portfolio of Pedagogical Philosophy

A portfolio of statements that outline the professional beliefs gained across the entire unit of study. Your portfolio must address these areas (one succinct paragraph for each)

 

  1. Statement on how students learn (constructivism vs direct instruction)
  2. What is the purpose of Jazz Education?
  3. Fundamentals of student development in learning to play Jazz (style, instrumental roles, balance & blend, improvisation, phrasing & articulation, historical perspective, luminaries).
  4. The role of conducting gestures to a Jazz Band
  5. Rehearsal technique & rehearsal structure
  6. Planning – the Teaching & Learning Cycle, outcomes & backward mapping
  7. Repertoire Selection
  8. Working with schools – Jazz education within the context of other ensembles & the music curriculum
  9. Working with parents
  10. Connecting students with professional musicians
  11. Outline the ideal jazz program in both a primary school + high school in NSW. Consider:
    1. How many groups?
    2. What learning & development occurs in each ensemble / age & stage.
    3. How would this work alongside
      1. Wind Band program
      2. Orchestra Program
      3. Studio teachers
      4. NSW School curriculum

Assessment criteria

Fail: (Below 50%) Work not of acceptable standard.

Work may fail for any or all of the following reasons: irrelevance of content; failure to demonstrate understanding of content; insufficient or overlong word length; inability to communicate ideas effectively; inappropriate responses to exam questions.

 

Pass: (50%-64%) Work of acceptable standard.

Written work meets basic requirements in terms of reading/research; relevant material; tendency to descriptive summary rather than critical argument; reasonably coherent presentation; basic understanding of teaching skills, techniques and concepts; acceptable presentation through grammar and spelling.

 

Credit: (65%-74%) Highly competent work demonstrating potential for higher study.

Evidence of broader understanding than pass level; offers synthesis with some critical evaluation of material; coherent argument using a range of relevant evidence; some evidence of independent thought. A high credit (70-74) shows some evidence of ability to problematise and think conceptually.

 

Distinction: (75%-84%) Work of superior standard.

Demonstrates initiative in research and wide, appropriate reading; complex understanding of question and ability to critically review material in relation to underlying assumptions and values; analyses material in relation to empirical and theoretical contexts; properly documented; clear, well-developed structure and argument with some signs of literary style.

 

High Distinction: (85%-100%) Work of exceptional standard.

Demonstrates high level of initiative in research and reading; sophisticated critical analysis of evidence; high level engagement with theoretical issues, innovative use of reading/research material and impressive command of underlying debates and assumptions; properly documented and written with style, originality and precision.

 

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Practical Teaching Assessment - 0% if not completed at one of the available offsite rehearsals Weekly Reflective Statements - 0% for this entire component of the final mark if any of the weekly statements are submitted late

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE WHY TEACH? THE BENEFITS OF MUSIC EDUCATION IN GENERAL INVESTIGATING MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT TEACHING MYTHS ABOUT JAZZ EDUCATION HISTORICAL BACKGROUND CONSTRUCTIVISM VS DIRECT INSTRUCTION - JEAN PIAGET, LEV VIGOTSKY, BENJAMIN BLOOM Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 02 DIFFERENT LEARNERS UNDERSTANDING LEARNING STYLES – HOWARD GARDNER INDIVIDUALISED INSTRUCTION – MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES, ZPD, DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES, WHAT IS THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT? CAROL ANN TOMLINSON TEACHING JAZZ AS AN ORAL AND AURAL LANGUAGE - SEQUENTIAL INSTRUCTION INDIVIDUALISED INSTRUCTION Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO7
Week 03 TEACHING IN PRACTICE – PRIVATE AND ENSEMBLE TEACHING ARTICULATION & PHRASING ASSESSMENT TYPES – SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE TEACHING IMPROVISATION CREATING LESSON PLANS FOR YOUR STUDENTS (REF: ‘JAZZ PEDAGOGY – A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE’ BY BRIAN LILLOS, P38-40) OUTCOMES & BACKWARD MAPPING ENSEMBLE REHEARSALS – SEATING & LAYOUT Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 04 CURRICULUM DESIGN ISSUES MEETING AUSTRALIAN CURRICULUM OUTCOMES (AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL CURRICULUM ‘THE ARTS’) PEDAGOGIC DISCOURSE SCORE ANALYSIS AND PREPARATION (HOW TO READ, PRIORITISE AND PLAN FOR REHEARSAL) DECODING THE RHYTHM SECTION FOR EVERYONE Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 05 ENSEMBLE TEACHING: BIG BAND TEACHING IMPROVISATION IN AN ENSEMBLE SETTING REPERTOIRE SELECTION REHEARSAL TECHNIQUE REPERTOIRE INVESTIGATION – BASIE STYLE Block teaching (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO7
Week 06 METHOD BOOKS & REPERTOIRE SOLO VOCABULARY & EXPOSURE TO JAZZ STANDARDS CONDUCTING GESTURES 1 – WHAT, WHEN & WHY. REPERTOIRE INVESTIGATION – AFRO CUBAN Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 07 ENGAGEMENT & BEHAVIOUR MANAGEMENT CREATING AND MANAGING THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT ZPD - RESOURCES AND REPERTOIRE SYNTHESIS OF DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM REHEARSAL TECHNIQUES CONDUCTING GESTURES 2 – WHAT NOT, WHEN NOT & WHY NOT. REPERTOIRE INVESTIGATION – BALLAD (CONDUCTING FOCUS) Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO5 LO7
Week 08 ENSEMBLE TEACHING: COMBO MOCK REHEARSAL – ALL STUDENTS BRING INSTRUMENTS. REPERTOIRE INVESTIGATION – WHICH “LATIN”? – FOCUS ON SAMBA/ BOSSA NOVA Block teaching (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 09 SCHOOLS VISITS – ALL STUDENTS MUST ATTEND AT LEAST ONE OF THE AVAILABLE REHEARSALS. THIS IS THE PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT (25% OF FINAL MARK) DATES AND TIMES TBA This component of the course and its assessment is contingent on the developing Covid-19 situation. Should school visits not be possible, a replacement lecture and assessment will be given Block teaching (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 10 TEACHING IMPROVISATION IN COMBOS AND BIG BANDS JAZZ LISTENING IN REHEARSAL CONCEPTS IN TEACHING IMPROVISATION IN GROUPS EXPECTATIONS OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS REPERTOIRE INVESTIGATION – CONTEMPORARY/ ECM Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 11 THE ECOSYSTEM – WORKING WITH PARENTS, SCHOOLS AND THE COMMUNITY PROGRAM DESIGN – THE 3-5 YEAR PLAN INHERITING A PROGRAM BUILDING A PROGRAM FROM SCRATCH BUDGETING FOR YOUR PROGRAM REPERTOIRE INVESTIGATION – WHERE TO FIND REPERTOIRE AND HOW TO PROGRAM Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO6 LO7
Week 12 CLINICS, WORKSHOPS AND CAMPS EXAM (IN LECTURE TIME) SELECTING A CLINICIAN CONNECTING STUDENTS WITH PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS AND QUALIFIED MUSICIANS WORKING AS A CLINICIAN CREATING YOUR PEDAGOGICAL PHILOSOPHY PORTFOLIO (ASSESSMENT DUE NOVEMBER 27TH 2020 Block teaching (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 3 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 60-75 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. • demonstrate a knowledge of techniques for planning and delivering effective instrumental lessons to individual students
  • LO2. • demonstrate a knowledge of techniques for planning and delivering effective jazz ensemble lessons in both a big band and combo setting
  • LO3. • evaluate and modify the effectiveness of their own teaching practice
  • LO4. • design and implement an effective school based jazz education program
  • LO5. • demonstrate an understanding of professional best practice in both private and ensemble teaching
  • LO6. • demonstrate an understanding of the value of jazz education
  • LO7. • demonstrate awareness of cultural and social influences on curriculum design

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

http://sydney.edu.au/handbooks/conservatorium/rules/faculty_resolutions.shtml (Item 12):

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.