Skip to main content
Unit of study_

LAWS5013: Evidence

Intensive July, 2023 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit of study aims to teach students the laws of evidence as they operate in civil and criminal trials in Australia. The unit aims to introduce students to the adversarial context within which lawyers might encounter evidential issues in the course of a trial. Attention is given to differences between the civil trial and the accusatorial criminal trial. The unit considers the laws of evidence contained in legislation and the common law. This unit focuses on the Uniform Evidence Law (particularly, Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)) and develop students' skills in statutory interpretation. The unit considers the rules for adducing testimony and other forms of evidence; the rules of admissibility (relevance, hearsay, opinion, tendency and coincidence, credibility, character, and the discretions to exclude evidence); and principles relating to proof (including burdens and standards of proof, judicial notice, and missing evidence). The distinction between the roles of the trial judge (as tribunal of law) and the jury (as tribunal of fact) in the jury trial is highlighted. We consider the forces contributing to reform of evidence law, in particular in relation to the prosecution of adult and child sexual assault, and students are encouraged to think critically about the doctrines that govern the laws of evidence.

Unit details and rules

Unit code LAWS5013
Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS2016
Prerequisites
? 
LAWS5003
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Salim Farrar, salim.farrar@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Salim Farrar, salim.farrar@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation Class participation
Participation
10% Ongoing n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Supervised test
? 
In-semester test (40%)
Problem questions
40% Week 01
Due date: 23 Jun 2023 at 14:30
80 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Supervised exam
? 
Final exam
Exam
50% Week 04
Due date: 10 Jul 2023 at 10:00
2 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Assessment summary

Class Participation (10%):  Students are to prepare tutorial questions allocated by a sign-up list posted on Canvas a week prior to the unit.  On-call will begin on Day 2 and continue to the final day of the unit. On-call will take place in the final hour and a half of the class.  A degree of research is expected. All students are expected to read up on the topics for each day, respond to questions during inter-active lectures and follow any tasks set.  Evaluation is based on demonstration of comprehension of topics under consideration, extent of preparation and evidence of a critical approach.

Interim test (40%):  Students will complete an 80 minute mid-semester test, with an additional 15 minutes of reading time. This will take place on campus on 23 June at 14.30 AEST. It will be a pen and paper test and CLOSED BOOK. The test will consist of one or more medium length problem questions. The test will cover materials from Topics 1 to 9 (including Hearsay doctrine and exceptions).

Final exam (50%): The exam will be held on 10 July at 10am AEST. The exam will be 2 hours writing and 30 minutes reading time. The exam will have two sections and both sections must be completed.  Section 1 will be an essay and students must choose 1 from a choice of 3.  The questions may address any topics studied in the unit. Section 2 is a compulsory problem which will focus on the topics after Hearsay. The final exam is OPEN BOOK. Students can bring in their own notes, books and copies of the Evidence Act. But they must NOT bring in their phones, tablets, computers, smart watches or library books.

Note the general assessment guidelines. The mark assigned will reflect the usual considerations – materiality, accuracy, clarity, originality, provision of authority. You should provide references for your statements of law or where you are using someone else’s work. However, as in a regular sit-down 2-hour exam, you need not strictly comply with AGLC4. It is an exam, not an assignment. Just provide sufficient information for us to identify the source (a) If you refer to cases from the readings, the case name alone will suffice. Otherwise, eg, case name and date or court (b) For secondary sources, eg, surname or name of commission, and title of book, article or report. 

 

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate.

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers a descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject area.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Late penalties do not apply to exams or tests and any late submission will not be accepted.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Ongoing 1. Introduction; 2. Relevance; 3. Proof (part (i) Burdens and Standards) Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
1. Adversarial Trial; 2. Witnesses; 3. Documents; 4. Real Evidence. Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Credibility Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Hearsay Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Opinion Evidence Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Admissions and Self-Incrimination Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
1. Tendency and Coincidence Evidence; 2. Character of the Accused Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
1. Identification Evidence; 2. Discretions (1): ss 135-137 Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Discretions (2): Improperly Obtained Evidence (s 138) Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
1. Proof (ii) - Directions; 2. Revision Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes (or as otherwise specified by the Unit Coordinator) to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Attendance requirements may be satisfied by in person attendance as specified by the Unit Coordinator. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment.  

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

  • Kumar, Odgers and Peden, Uniform Evidence Law: Commentary & Materials (2018, 6th ed)
  • Field, Uniform Evidence Law 2023, 4th edition

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. identify, describe, and explain, at an advanced level, the issues, relevant rules, and fundamental principles of Evidence Law in NSW. This includes the adducing of evidence, admissibility, proof and miscellaneous matters within the context of the adversarial trial.
  • LO2. critically analyse novel fact scenarios to identify the evidential issues and applicable laws, applying knowledge of evidence law to evaluate arguments and effectively solve legal problems.
  • LO3. employ multimodal research skills to effectively synthesise theory, statutes and, case law to develop sound written and oral legal arguments.
  • LO4. define the ethical and professional responsibilities of legal practitioners, appreciate the ethical dimensions of the adversarial trial, and apply the capacity to influence professional life in resolving individual conflict situations and engaging in policy debates.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Word changes from 'course' to 'unit'.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.