Skip to main content
Unit of study_

LAWS6824: Commercial Conflict of Laws

Intensive April, 2022 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Primarily taught by an experienced commercial practitioner, Donald Robertson, this unit will focus on cross-border commercial transactions and disputes with a transnational nature. An emphasis is placed on risk management in those transactions using the tools of private international law. Often in those transactions and disputes, the forum is itself a matter of dispute. The careful use of contractual devices might help manage that risk (litigation risk) as well as the risk of an unexpected and unwanted law applying (transaction risk). After a general introduction and refresher on the rules of private international law, we consider the management of risk in transaction planning and in the implementation of the transaction from the perspective of the rules of private international law. The unit follows chronologically the general course of a cross-border transaction, from inception to transnational dispute. There have been significant developments in the last few years whereby international cooperation in relation to these matters has produced international instruments of great utility, which instruments need to be taken into account at the transaction planning stage.

Unit details and rules

Unit code LAWS6824
Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS6884
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

undergraduate law degree

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Ben Chen, ben.chen@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Research Essay (long release)
Essay
75% Formal exam period
Due date: 17 Jun 2022 at 16:00

Closing date: 17 Jul 2022
6000 words / 69 days
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO7 LO8 LO2 LO3 LO6 LO5
Participation Class Participation
Structured participation
10% Week 03
Due date: 12 Mar 2022 at 17:00
6.5 in-class hours (1 teaching day)
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO5 LO2 LO8
Assignment Reflective writing (long release)
Reflective writing based on participation in the mock case assessment
15% Week 06
Due date: 01 Apr 2022 at 16:00

Closing date: 01 May 2022
1000 words / 20 days
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO8 LO7 LO4 LO1 LO5 LO6 LO3

Assessment summary

To pass the unit, students must obtain a total mark of at least 50% overall final result.

Class participation (10%):

Students will participate in a mock case on the second teaching day. Individually and in groups, students will work through a series of exercises based on a real case. 

After participation in the mock case, students will obtain a better appreciation of the rules and principles governing venue in transnational litigation and arbitration; the practical considerations that inform the choice between international commercial litigation, arbitration and mediation and the conduct of such proceedings; the rules and principles governing the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards and settlement agreements arising out of mediation. 

Students are assessed on their performance on the various practical simulations conducted as well as on their oral contributions in in-class discussions. Students are expected to demonstrate knowledge of the relevant rules and principles, practically apply these rules and principles, and collaborate with each other. 

Students who are unable to participate in the mock case must apply for Special Consideration. A failure to participate in the mock case will result in 0/10 for this assessment and 0/15 for the reflective writing assessment. 

The outcome for a successful Special Consideration application is to be determined by the discretion of the lecturer. 

Reflective writing (15%):

After the mock case, students must submit a 1000 word reflective essay which will also require them to make references to the relevant cases and other teaching materials. 

Students are expected to reflect, synthesise and consolidate what they have learned from the mock case, and relate their experience to the teaching materials. 

After completing the reflective essay, students will obtain a better appreciation of the rules and principles governing venue in transnational litigation and arbitration; the practical considerations that inform the choice between international commercial litigation, arbitration and mediation and the conduct of such proceedings; the rules and principles governing the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards and settlement agreements arising out of mediation. 

This essay is due at 4pm on Friday, 1 April 2022. Students are assessed on their analysis and reflection of what they have learned from the mock case and their connection of their learning experience to the relevant cases and other teaching materials. 

Students who are unable to complete the reflective essay by the due date must apply for Special Consideration. A failure to complete the reflective essay will result in 0/15 for this assessment. 

The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application prior to the closing date (1 May 2022, 4pm) will be an extension. After the closing date, the outcome will be determined by the discretion of the lecturer.

Research essay (75%):

Students are required to write a 6000 word research essay that critically examines and communicates complex theoretical issues and practical problems in cross-border transactional planning, litigation and arbitration. After completing this essay, students will obtain an increased ability to understand, analyse and communicate such issues and problems.

On the last day of class, a choice from a limited number of topics will be provided to students. The research essay is due at 4pm on Friday, 17 June 2022.

Students who are unable to complete the research essay must apply for Special Consideration. A failure to complete the research essay will result in 0/75 for this assessment.

The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application prior to the closing date (17 July 2022, 4pm) will be an extension. After the closing date, the outcome will be determined by the discretion of the lecturer.

Assessment requirement to pass a unit of study

A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

• Completely answers the question.
• Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
• Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research
required).
• Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
• Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

• Completely answers the question.
• Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
• Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
• Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented
argument.
• Generally well expressed and free from errors.
• Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

• Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
• Contains no significant errors
• Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
• Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
• Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

• Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
• Contains some significant errors.
• Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
• Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
• Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
• Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
• Adequate expression.
• Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and
satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject
area.

Fail

0 - 49

• Does not answer the question.
• Contains significant or numerous errors.
• Few or no identifiable arguments.
• Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
• Lack of research or analysis.
• Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or
structure.
• Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the
assessment.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, which has not been granted an extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per calendar day or part thereof.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Ongoing Day 1: 1. Managing risk in cross-border transactions 2. Choice of forum – jurisdiction 3. Choice of law Block teaching (6.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Day 2: 4. Jurisdiction 5. Choose your mode of dispute and forum: court or international arbitration 6. Enforcing foreign arbitral awards Block teaching (6.5 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO8
Day 3: 7. Interim measures 8. Taking evidence abroad 9. The applicable law in cross-border disputes 10. Substance and procedure 11. Pleading and proving foreign law Block teaching (6.5 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Day 4: 12. Claiming sovereign immunity 13. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments: common law and statute 14. Choice of court & recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments: treaty Block teaching (6.5 hr) LO4 LO8

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of live classes (or as otherwise specified by the Unit Coordinator) to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Attendance requirements must be satisfied by in person attendance as specified by the Unit Coordinator. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment.

For PG intensives only: For units offered in Intensive mode, participation in all scheduled sessions may be expected by a Unit Coordinator in order to satisfy the requirements of the unit.

Word count penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude bibliography; footnote numbers; footnote citation; cover page and include body text; headings and sub-headings; quotations; anything other than numbers and citations in footnotes.

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer, and a link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at https://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au/c.php?g=508212&p=3476376

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Ideally students will have a copy of or be able to obtain access to Davies, Bell, Brereton and Douglas, Nygh’s Conflict of Laws in Australia (10th ed., 2019)

In addition, the required readings will be available via the Canvas site.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Develop an ability to design and build appropriate risk management devices into cross-border transactions
  • LO2. Have a good technical grasp of major theories and general principles of the conflict of laws
  • LO3. Develop a mature understanding of the rules and principles governing venue in transnational litigation and arbitration
  • LO4. Develop an appreciation of the practical considerations that inform the choice between litigation or international arbitration and the conduct of such proceedings
  • LO5. Identify the significance and implications arising from parallel or multiple proceedings in different forums
  • LO6. Have an appreciation of strategic considerations in relation to taking evidence abroad as well as pleading and proving foreign law
  • LO7. Identify, critically examine and evaluate the choice of law rules governing contractual, tortious and equitable obligations
  • LO8. Examine and critically apply the rules and principles governing the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Amended and expanded the learning outcomes, amended all the assessments and elaborated upon all of them, and amended the learning activities.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.