Skip to main content
Unit of study_

MARC4001: Urban Architecture Research Studio

Semester 1, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The Urban Architecture Research Studio examines the role and agency of architecture in the urban context - interrogating the internal and external parameters that act on the design process at incremental urban scales and intensities and engaging with the social, economic, environmental, legislative and managerial frameworks that shape urban development. The studio will prompt students to develop critical positions in response to a studio brief selected from one or more options that probe urban issues, and extend and explore those positions through a research-based architectural design process. MARC4001 Urban Architecture Research Studio, MARC4002 Sustainable Architecture Research Studio and MARC4003 Digital Architecture Research Studio are all available in both Semesters 1 and 2. Students may enrol or pre-enrol freely, but some will be asked to swap to create equal groups. After three semesters each student will have done each of the studios. The studios examine the relationships between architecture and urbanism; architecture and sustainability; and architecture and digital design. Each is based around one or more design projects which address a specialised area of study, supported by lectures and seminars which introduce the relevant theory, knowledge and design precedents. Studios require the investigation of key technical issues and systems, and their innovative integration in the design, with the preparation of appropriate documentation. On the successful completion of these units, students will have demonstrated: an ability to formulate, interpret and communicate appropriate concepts derived from the study of brief and site; an ability to extend those starting points into a working design proposal; an ability to develop the design proposal in response to critique, and produce a building design which demonstrably embodies understanding of the principles associated with the specialised study area; an ability to communicate the design ideas effectively through appropriate graphic and three-dimensional means using architectural conventions; and an ability to cohesively design and execute a comprehensive presentation of the project. These units are core to the Master of Architecture.

Unit details and rules

Unit code MARC4001
Academic unit Architecture
Credit points 12
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Sandra Loschke, sandra.loschke@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment group assignment Preliminary research, design development, interim reviews
Graphic documents and verbal presentation
40% Week 08
Due date: 20 Apr 2020 at 09:00

Closing date: 20 Apr 2020
all day
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment group assignment Final Design Project and Portfolio
Verbal presentation of the Final Design Project and submission as portfolio
60% Week 13
Due date: 25 May 2020 at 09:00

Closing date: 25 May 2020
all day
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or exceptional skill.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.

Credit

65 - 74

Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed, or work of excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Pass

50 - 64

Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed.

Fail

0 - 49

Work that does not demonstrate satisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning outcomes assessed.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Lecture: Introduction Lecture (1 hr) LO1
Formation of studio groups, introductions, site visits and information mining Tutorial (5 hr) LO1
Week 02 Transfomative Design: Alternative Futures for Urban Housing Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Research and design development Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 03 Obsolescence Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Research and design development Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 04 Housing: Social Mix and Apartment Diversity Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Design development Tutorial (5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 05 In Detail: Structural Solutions for Transformative Redesign Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Design Development Tutorial (5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 06 Lecture: On Verbal Presentation - Dare to Pitch Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Design development Tutorial (5 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 07 Mock up Presentations and Editing Day Tutorial (6 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 08 Preliminary research, design development, interim review (40%) Presentation (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Guest lecture Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Design Development Tutorial (5 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 10 Visual Presentation Techniques Lecture (1 hr) LO5 LO6
Design Development Tutorial (5 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Designing for a classless society: The politics of housing in architecture Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO6
Design Development Tutorial (5 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 All Day – Final Editing Session and Review Tutorial (6 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 13 Final project review and portfolio submission (60%) Project (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Attendance and class requirements

  • The School’s requirement of 90% attendance is waived. Participation in this unit is required via online components.” 
  • From week 4 onward, the participation mark  reflects participation in the online studio and activities in the online environment.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Readings and Electronic Resources

Students are expected to conduct their own literature searches and select readings as appropriate for their individual projects. The reading list below makes suggestions for essential reading.

Additional readings/documents are available on the CANVAS: https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/login/canvas.

 

Abramson, Daniel Obsolescence: An Architectural History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2016. 

E-book: full text online at the Library website

 

De Monchaux, Thomas. “A New Idea in Architecture? No New Buildings.” Metropolis: Architecture Design (December 30, 2019). 

Online edition: Metropolis

 

Huber, David. “Lacaton & Vassal Have Pioneered a Strategy for Saving France’s Social Housing” Metropolis: Architecture Design( January 1, 2016). 

Online edition: Metropolis

 

McLachlan, James. "Exemplary Housing Estate Regeneration in Europe." AJ The Architects’ Journal (01/ 2015).

Online editon: AJ

 

Bokern, Anneke. "Amsterdam-Slotervaart." In Making Heimat: Germany, Arrival Country, edited by Peter Cachola Schmal, Oliver Elser and Anna Scheuermann, 176– 97. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, 2016.

E-copy available on CANVAS 

 

Löschke, Sandra Karina, and Hazel Easthope. "Postproduced: How Adaptive Redesign and Participatory Approaches Can Transform Ageing Housing." In From Conflict to Inclusion in Housing: Interaction of Communities, Residents and Activists, edited by Giorgos Artopoulos Graham Cains, Kirsten Day, 71-86. London: UCL Press, 2017.

Available Online: From Conflict to Inclusion in Housing

 

Geoff Turnbull “Who’s Who in Waterloo – April 7, 2017” The South Sydney Herald (7 April 2017) 

Available Online: https://southsydneyherald.com.au/%EF%BB%BF-whos-who-in-waterloo-7-april-2017/

 

NSW Government, Plans for your Area: State Significant Precinct: Waterloo Estate

Available Online: https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Plans-for-your-area/State-Significant-Precincts/Waterloo/Waterloo-Estate

 

City of Sydney: Vision – Changing urban Precincts/Waterloo Precincts

Available Online: https://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/vision/changing-urban-precincts/waterloo-precinct

 

Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2071.0 - Census of Population and Housing: Reflecting Australia - Stories from the Census, 2016.

Available Online: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/2071.0~2016~Main%20Features~Apartment%20Living~20

 

Hebel, Dirk E.; Wisniewska, Marta H.; Heisel, Felix. Building from waste: recovered materials in architecture and construction. Birkhäuser, 2014. 

E-book available online at library website. 

 

Deplazes, Andrea (ed.). Constructing architecture : materials, processes, structures Basel: Birkhäuser, 2005.

E-book available online at library website. 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. formulate, interpret and communicate appropriate concepts derived from a study of the program/brief and context/site
  • LO2. develop a design proposal in response to critique
  • LO3. produce a persuasive architectural proposition which demonstrably embodies understanding of the principles associated with the specialised study area
  • LO4. communicate design ideas effectively through appropriate graphic and three-dimensional means using architectural conventions
  • LO5. cohesively design and execute a comprehensive presentation of the project
  • LO6. independently and comprehensively explore relevant theories and issues raised during the design.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

I am coordinating this particular unit of study for the first time. If you would like to give feedback, I welcome you to do so during semester - I appreciate hearing your views.

Additional costs

Costs associated with model making and printing.

Site visit guidelines

When visiting site, please carry with you your student card and the formal letter issued by Kim Beecroft/The University of Sydney (available on CANVAS)

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.