Skip to main content
Unit of study_

MARC6000: Thesis Studio

Semester 2, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

The Thesis Studio is a final design studio option of the Master of Architecture. A unique aspect of the Thesis Studio is the integration of a capstone design project with a research thesis. Firstly, this unit requires students to produce an original design proposition in respect to an architectural brief that integrates a specific research agenda and a critical theme pertinent to current architectural discourse. In the continued engagement with critical topics, students further specialise their areas of design and research expertise. Through thoroughly investigated, well-resolved and technically adept architectural projects, students deliver contributions to knowledge in their chosen field of investigation. Secondly, students develop an in-depth piece of research in an area of architectural study. Topics can include any aspect of architecture for which adequate supervision can be made available. Specialisation include, but are not limited to architectural design, the history or theory of architecture, architectural or building science, urban design, indigenous architecture, and architectural technology. Research methods may likewise be drawn from across the full breadth of disciplinary, interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary practices in which architecture figures. The research may inform or be complementary to work being undertaken. The outcome of the research is presented for assessment in a form appropriate to the research topic (which might include, but not be limited to, a short dissertation, or a design, prototype, workflow, or art project presented with supporting text). Within the programmatic framework of the Thesis Studio, students will develop individual design propositions and research approaches that demonstrate skills in critical evaluation, independent decisionmaking and communication through multi-disciplinary collaboration and discussion with academics, practitioners, researchers, government and industry. Delivered by visiting national and international architects, design practitioners and researchers, this unit will provide students with a platform to demonstrate design prowess and an engagement with critical cultural discourse.

Unit details and rules

Unit code MARC6000
Academic unit Architecture
Credit points 24
Prohibitions
? 
MARC6010 and MARC6020
Prerequisites
? 
MARC5000 and MARC5010 and MARC5020 and MARC5300 and MARC5400
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Chris L. L Smith, chris.l.smith@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Thesis Submission
Portfolio, documented design, analysis and research Refer to canvas.
10% Formal exam period
Due date: 14 Nov 2022 at 21:00
max 40 A4 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO4 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Conceptual Design
You will have 15 minutes to present prelim work, conceptual, brief, site
20% Week 05
Due date: 02 Sep 2022 at 09:00
15-minute presentation
Outcomes assessed: LO5 LO3 LO2 LO1
Assignment Schematic Presentation
Presentation of Interim design work
20% Week 09
Due date: 07 Oct 2022 at 09:00
10 minute presentation
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO3 LO2 LO1 LO5
Assignment Final Design Presentation
Refer to Canvas for details
50% Week 13
Due date: 04 Nov 2022 at 09:00
15-minute presentation in class
Outcomes assessed: LO5 LO7 LO4 LO3 LO2 LO1 LO6

Assessment summary

Assessment 1. Conceptual design presentation (20%)

Assessment 2. Schematic design presentation (20%)

Assessment 3. Final presentation (50%)

Assessment 4. Thesis (10%)

Assessment criteria

Grade

Description

High Distinction 85 - 100

Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or exceptional skill.

Distinction 75 - 84

Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.

Credit 65 - 74

Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal evidences excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Pass 50 - 64

Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal evidences satisfactory, though marginal quality for the majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Fail
0 - 49

Work that does not demonstrate satisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal does not evidence satisfactoryquality for the majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Per uni policies.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Weekly Live online lectures on topics of interest Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Studio tutorials on work-in-progress Tutorial (9 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

Attendance and class requirements

Please refer to the Resolutions of the University School: http://sydney.edu.au/handbooks/architecture/rules/faculty_resolutions.shtml

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 24 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 480-600 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Produce an architectural design proposition as a creative response to a studio brief, to a high level of resolution.
  • LO2. Appraise the multiple criteria that impact architectural design, including programmatic, thematic, historical, theoretical, cultural and ecological concerns, and synthesize these in a persuasive project.
  • LO3. Respond to the challenges of new knowledges and practices in architecture, including emergent concepts, methods and technologies to arrive at novel solutions to complex problems.
  • LO4. Evaluate design processes and propositions using the conventions of architectural critique.
  • LO5. Generate a detailed piece of research, including original findings and/or analysis.
  • LO6. Demonstrate expert knowledge of a defined topic in the field of architecture and advanced understanding of key ideas, movements and protagonists in architectural discourse.
  • LO7. Demonstrate well-developed skills and fluency in various modes of architectural expression, including writing, drawings and models, to develop and communicate convincing architectural propositions and present findings/analysis/scholarship in a manner appropriate to the conventions of design and humanities research.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

Alignment with Competency standards

Outcomes Competency standards
LO1
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
2. Design: Pre-Design
2.1. Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
3. Design: Conceptual Design
3.1. Design response integrates the objectives of brief, user intent and built purpose.
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
4. Design: Schematic Design
4.1. Evaluation of design options in relation to project requirements.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
5. Documentation: Detailed Design
5.1. Application of creative imagination and aesthetic judgement in producing a resolved project design in regard to site planning, physical composition and spatial planning as appropriate to the project brief.
LO2
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
1.3. Assessment of project budget and timeframe against project requirements and objectives.
1.4. Identification of factors that may impact on client project requirements and objectives.
2.1. Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
2.2. Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
2.4. Analysis of project brief in relation to clients objective budget and timeframe.
3.3. Design response incorporates assessment of the physical location and relevant wider regional, contextual and environmental issues.
3.4. Design response incorporates assessment of relevant legislation, codes and industry standards.
3.5. Exploration and application of ordering, sequencing and modelling of three-dimensional form and spatial content.
3.7. Assessment and integration of construction systems and materials consistent with project brief.
LO3
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
5.3. Evaluation and integration of regulatory requirements.
5.5. Integration of materials and components based upon an understanding of their physical properties.
5.6. Integration of relevant technical services, environmental and transportation systems.
LO7
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
6.4. Timely completion and communication of accurate and comprehensible documents that will include, as required, drawings, models, specifications, schedules and other relevant modes of information.

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the second time that this unit is coordinated by me. Minor adjustments in schedule and assessments are made based on student feedback.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.