Skip to main content
Unit of study_

MARC6010: Architectural Studio 3

Semester 1, 2023 [Normal day] - Remote

Architectural Studio 3 is a final design studio option of the Master of Architecture. This unit requires students to produce an original design proposition in respect to an architectural brief that integrates a specific research agenda and a critical theme pertinent to current architectural discourse. In the continued engagement with critical topics, students further specialise their areas of design and research expertise. Delivered by visiting national and international architects, design practitioners and researchers, this unit will provide students with a platform to demonstrate design prowess and an engagement with critical cultural discourse. Within the programmatic framework of the studio, students will develop individual design propositions and research approaches that demonstrate skills in critical evaluation, independent decision-making and communication through multi-disciplinary collaboration and discussion with academics, practitioners, researchers, government and industry. Through thoroughly investigated, well-resolved and technically adept architectural projects, students deliver contributions to knowledge in their chosen field of investigation.

Unit details and rules

Unit code MARC6010
Academic unit Architecture
Credit points 12
Prohibitions
? 
MARC6000
Prerequisites
? 
MARC5000 and MARC5010 and MARC5020
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Duanfang Lu, duanfang.lu@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Portfolio
Portfolio. Refer to Canvas for details.
10% Formal exam period
Due date: 08 Jun 2023 at 22:00
Max 6,000 words including references.
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Interim Presentation I. Conceptual Design
Presentation on conceptual design. Refer to Canvas for details.
20% Week 05
Due date: 23 Mar 2023 at 22:00
15-minute presentation
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO3 LO2
Assignment Interim Presentation II. Architectural Resolution
Presentation on architectural resolution. Refer to Canvas for details.
20% Week 09
Due date: 27 Apr 2023 at 22:00
15-minute presentation
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Final presentation
Presentation on final project. Refer to Canvas for details.
50% Week 13
Due date: 25 May 2023 at 22:00
15-minute presentation
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Assessment 1. Conceptual design (20%)

Assessment 2. Architectural resolution (20%)

Assessment 3a. Final project (50%)

Assessment 3b. Portfolio (10%)

Assessment criteria

   
   
 

 

Grade

page7image10604368

Description

High Distinction 85 - 100

Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or exceptional skill.

Distinction 75 - 84

page7image21277376

Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.

page7image21267584

Credit 65 - 74

Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal evidences excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Pass 50 - 64

page7image21267200

Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal evidences satisfactory, though marginal quality for the majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Fail
1 - 49

page7image21268928

Work that does not demonstrate satisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning outcomes assessed. The design proposal does not evidence satisfactoryquality for the majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Formal exam period Final Design & Portfolio Review (60%) Studio (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 01 Thematic approach to architectural design Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Organise groups Review Project Brief Conceptual design Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 02 Framing the project Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Preliminary Thematic Framing Preliminary Site Analysis Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 03 (Re)sourcing themes Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Preliminary Design Strategies: Site and Building Parti/Strategy Diagrams Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 04 Reading precedents Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Developed Design Strategies Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 05 Theorising the project Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Preliminary Technical Strategies Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 06 Theory lecture Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Conceptual design review (20%) Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 Theory lecture Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Week 08 Theory lecture Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Easter Friday Recess Individual study (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Theory lecture Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Interim design review (20%) Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 Theory lecture Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Design Development Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO5
Week 11 Theory lecture Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Technical Development Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 12 Theory lecture Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Design Development Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 13 Theory lecture Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Final Design Review Formative Assessment Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Please refer to the Resolutions of the University School: https://www.sydney.edu.au/policies/showdoc.aspx?recnum=PDOC2022/542&RendNum=0

 

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library eReserve, available on Canvas, and uploaded files on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Exercise critical thinking in order to empirically and creatively research a pre-existing system/precedent
  • LO2. Demonstrate competency in 3D modelling and scripting concepts through Rhino and Grasshopper and associated software literacy
  • LO3. Utilise an understanding of the parametric process in order to produce multiple imaginative solutions to a design problem
  • LO4. Utilise rendering software and post production techniques to successfully communicate through a carefully crafted visualisation
  • LO5. Integrate knowledge gained about computational strategies to the design process to enable creative and innovative solutions at various scales

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

Alignment with Competency standards

Outcomes Competency standards
LO1
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
1. Design: Project briefing
2. Design: Pre-Design
2.1. Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
2.6. Preparation and analysis of project development options in response to project brief.
3. Design: Conceptual Design
3.1. Design response integrates the objectives of brief, user intent and built purpose.
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
3.3. Design response incorporates assessment of the physical location and relevant wider regional, contextual and environmental issues.
3.5. Exploration and application of ordering, sequencing and modelling of three-dimensional form and spatial content.
3.7. Assessment and integration of construction systems and materials consistent with project brief.
3.8. Application of manual and digital graphic techniques and modelling to describe three-dimensional form and spatial relationships.
4. Design: Schematic Design
4.1. Evaluation of design options in relation to project requirements.
4.2. Evaluation of design options against values of physical, environmental and cultural contexts.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
4.5. Investigation and integration of appropriate structural, construction, service and transport systems in the project design.
4.6. Investigation and integration of appropriate material selection for the project design.
4.7. Coordination and integration of appropriate environmental systems, including for thermal comfort, lighting and acoustics.
5. Documentation: Detailed Design
5.1. Application of creative imagination and aesthetic judgement in producing a resolved project design in regard to site planning, physical composition and spatial planning as appropriate to the project brief.
5.2. Resolution of project design addressing all building occupancy and functional aspects including spatial requirements and relationships and circulation aspects.
5.5. Integration of materials and components based upon an understanding of their physical properties.
5.6. Integration of relevant technical services, environmental and transportation systems.
6. Documentation: Documentation
6.3. Incorporation of the project requirements and objectives in accordance with Project Brief and approved Detailed Design.
6.4. Timely completion and communication of accurate and comprehensible documents that will include, as required, drawings, models, specifications, schedules and other relevant modes of information.
LO2
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
4.1. Evaluation of design options in relation to project requirements.
4.2. Evaluation of design options against values of physical, environmental and cultural contexts.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
LO3
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
1.4. Identification of factors that may impact on client project requirements and objectives.
2.1. Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
2.2. Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
3.1. Design response integrates the objectives of brief, user intent and built purpose.
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
3.3. Design response incorporates assessment of the physical location and relevant wider regional, contextual and environmental issues.
3.4. Design response incorporates assessment of relevant legislation, codes and industry standards.
3.7. Assessment and integration of construction systems and materials consistent with project brief.
3.8. Application of manual and digital graphic techniques and modelling to describe three-dimensional form and spatial relationships.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
4.5. Investigation and integration of appropriate structural, construction, service and transport systems in the project design.
4.6. Investigation and integration of appropriate material selection for the project design.
4.7. Coordination and integration of appropriate environmental systems, including for thermal comfort, lighting and acoustics.
LO4
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
LO5
National Standard of Competency for Architects - AACA
1.7. Preparation of project brief for approval by client and relevant stakeholders.
2.1. Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
3.1. Design response integrates the objectives of brief, user intent and built purpose.
3.2. Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
3.3. Design response incorporates assessment of the physical location and relevant wider regional, contextual and environmental issues.
3.4. Design response incorporates assessment of relevant legislation, codes and industry standards.
3.5. Exploration and application of ordering, sequencing and modelling of three-dimensional form and spatial content.
3.7. Assessment and integration of construction systems and materials consistent with project brief.
3.8. Application of manual and digital graphic techniques and modelling to describe three-dimensional form and spatial relationships.
4. Design: Schematic Design
4.1. Evaluation of design options in relation to project requirements.
4.2. Evaluation of design options against values of physical, environmental and cultural contexts.
4.3. Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
4.5. Investigation and integration of appropriate structural, construction, service and transport systems in the project design.
4.6. Investigation and integration of appropriate material selection for the project design.
4.7. Coordination and integration of appropriate environmental systems, including for thermal comfort, lighting and acoustics.
5.1. Application of creative imagination and aesthetic judgement in producing a resolved project design in regard to site planning, physical composition and spatial planning as appropriate to the project brief.
5.2. Resolution of project design addressing all building occupancy and functional aspects including spatial requirements and relationships and circulation aspects.
5.5. Integration of materials and components based upon an understanding of their physical properties.
5.6. Integration of relevant technical services, environmental and transportation systems.
National Standard of Competency for Architects -
Competency code Taught, Practiced or Assessed Competency standard
1.4 P Identification of factors that may impact on client project requirements and objectives.
2.1 P T A Identification, analysis and integration of information relevant to siting of project.
2.2 P A Application of principles controlling planning, development and design for the project site.
2.4 P A Analysis of project brief in relation to clients objective budget and timeframe.
2.6 T P A Preparation and analysis of project development options in response to project brief.
3.1 P A Design response integrates the objectives of brief, user intent and built purpose.
3.2 T P A Application of creative imagination, aesthetic judgement and critical evaluation in formulating design options.
3.3 P A Design response incorporates assessment of the physical location and relevant wider regional, contextual and environmental issues.
3.4 P Design response incorporates assessment of relevant legislation, codes and industry standards.
3.5 T P A Exploration and application of ordering, sequencing and modelling of three-dimensional form and spatial content.
3.7 P A Assessment and integration of construction systems and materials consistent with project brief.
3.8 P A Application of manual and digital graphic techniques and modelling to describe three-dimensional form and spatial relationships.
4.1 P A Evaluation of design options in relation to project requirements.
4.2 P A Evaluation of design options against values of physical, environmental and cultural contexts.
4.3 P A Application of creative imagination aesthetic judgement to produce coherent design
4.4 P A Inclusion of expertise of relevant specialists and consultants in developing the project design.
4.5 P A Investigation and integration of appropriate structural, construction, service and transport systems in the project design.
4.6 P A Investigation and integration of appropriate material selection for the project design.
4.7 P A Coordination and integration of appropriate environmental systems, including for thermal comfort, lighting and acoustics.
5.1 T P A Application of creative imagination and aesthetic judgement in producing a resolved project design in regard to site planning, physical composition and spatial planning as appropriate to the project brief.
5.2 P A Resolution of project design addressing all building occupancy and functional aspects including spatial requirements and relationships and circulation aspects.
5.3 P Evaluation and integration of regulatory requirements.
5.5 P A Integration of materials and components based upon an understanding of their physical properties.
5.6 P A Integration of relevant technical services, environmental and transportation systems.
6.1 P A Identification and adoption of a strategy, program and process of documentation integrated through all project stages to enable project delivery.
6.2 P Continuing coordination and integration of information and project material from relevant consultants, specialists and suppliers.
6.3 P A Incorporation of the project requirements and objectives in accordance with Project Brief and approved Detailed Design.
6.4 P A Timely completion and communication of accurate and comprehensible documents that will include, as required, drawings, models, specifications, schedules and other relevant modes of information.

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Due to the small number of enrolments in 12-cp MARC6010, students were re-assigned to 24-cp MARC6000, with reduced workload and assessment requirements: 1) Students are only required to attend lectures on Tuesdays 2-3pm and tutorials on Fridays 10am-1pm & 2-5pm. They are not required to attend the Tuesday tutorials unless they choose to do so. 2) Students are not required to submit a thesis or any work-in-progress related to thesis; Assessment 3b will be adjusted to portfolio only. 3) Students can choose to work as a team of two. The marking criteria of Assessments 1, 2, 3a and 3b will apply by excluding the thesis component.

The use of AI tools is allowed in this unit as an experiment in architectural education, so long as students use them appropriately and acknowledge their use following related University policies. In any case, students should not present AI-generated contents as their own. Acknowledgements should be made following related guidelines.

 

 

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.