Skip to main content
Unit of study_

MCGY2004: Aural Perception 3

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Sydney

Materials studied include more complex tonal melodies, chromatic tonal harmony, and rhythms using irregular division and small divisions.

Unit details and rules

Unit code MCGY2004
Academic unit
Credit points 3
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
MCGY1003
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Alex Chilvers, alex.chilvers@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Alex Chilvers, alex.chilvers@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Skills-based evaluation Oral Exam
Online examination
50% Formal exam period 20 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Assignment Transcription Assignments
Written assessments
30% Multiple weeks N/A
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO4
Small continuous assessment In-class solfège exercises
Practical assessments
20% Weekly N/A
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3

Assessment summary

  • In-class solfège exercises: Students will be assessed on their participation and performance in weekly tutorials. 
  • Transcription assignments: Students will be required to attempt a range of transcription tasks throughout the semester, with written solutions to be submitted online.
  • Oral exam: The oral exam (face-to-face via Zoom) will test the skills learned and developed across the entire semester. Tasks will include sight-singing melodies/rhythms, arpeggiating chord progressions, and analysing recorded excerpts.

 

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The following assessment criteria are used for performance work in this unit of study:

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Comprehensive and outstanding technical control and musical integrity in relation to developmental expectations. Musical individuality consistently projected to create a persuasive personal representation of the work. Performance flair indicative of soloist standard. A mark of 95 or above indicates extraordinary technical virtuosity and musical artistry.

Distinction

75 - 84

Excellent technical, musical and stylistic achievement. Consistently coherent and expressive performance. Some personal interpretation of the work suggesting soloist potential.

Credit

65 - 74

Confident technique with evidence of solid musicality and some stylistic achievement. Occasional lapses indicative of unresolved technical, artistic and/or stylistic issues. Projects potential for further development.

Pass

50 - 64

Satisfactory level of preparation and musical engagement. Some inconsistencies in musicianship, style and/or technique. Musical imagination and overall performance sense developing though some insecurity in this area.

Fail

0 - 49

Unsatisfactory technical achievement and/or unsatisfactory level of musical and artistic engagement. Limitations may be of such a scale and consistency as to call into question the student’s future direction in the programme.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

The following assessment criteria are used for written work in this unit of study:

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Demonstrates high level of initiative in research and reading; sophisticated critical analysis of evidence; high level engagement with theoretical issues, innovative use of reading/research material and impressive command of underlying debates and assumptions; properly documented and written with style, originality and precision.

Distinction

75 - 84

Demonstrates initiative in research and wide, appropriate reading; complex understanding of question and ability to critically review material in relation to underlying assumptions and values; analyses material in relation to empirical and theoretical contexts; properly documented; clear, well-developed structure and argument with some signs of literary style.

Credit

65 - 74

Evidence of broader understanding than pass level; offers synthesis with some critical evaluation of material; coherent argument using a range of relevant evidence; some evidence of independent thought, good referencing. A high credit (70-74) shows some evidence of ability to problematise and think conceptually.

Pass

50 - 64

Written work meets basic requirements in terms of reading/research; relevant material; tendency to descriptive summary rather than critical argument; makes a reasonable attempt to avoid paraphrasing; reasonably coherent structure; often has weaknesses in particular areas, especially in terms of narrow or underdeveloped treatment of question; acceptable documentation.

Fail

0 - 49

Work may fail for any or all of the following reasons: Unacceptable paraphrasing; irrelevance of content; poor spelling; poor presentation; grammar or structure so sloppy it cannot be understood; failure to demonstrate understanding of content; insufficient or overlong word length.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 The Chromatic Scale Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 02 Chords Applied to the Subdominant Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 03 The Whole-Tone Scale Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 Chords Applied to the Dominant Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 05 The Octatonic Scales Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 06 Advanced Rhythms Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 07 Mid-Semester Revision and Introduction to Modulation Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 08 Chords Applied to the Supertonic Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 Chords Applied to the Submediant Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 10 Chords Applied to the Mediant Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 11 Advanced Transcription Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 12 Final Revision Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: Due to the course being in online mode, the attendance requirements are significantly different to normal. For lab, students are required to submit evidence of working through exercises in the online lab tutorials as part of the weekly homework submission. In Solfege, students should be present for live face-to-face homework presentation where required by the tutor, or provide uploaded homework performance as required by the tutor.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 3 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 60-75 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Students must have access to the following materials:

  • Gary S. Karpinski, Manual for Ear Training and Sight Singing (Second edition). New York: Norton, 2017.
  • Gary S. Karpinski and Richard Kram, Anthology for Sight Singing (Second edition). New York: Norton, 2017.

There are a limited number of copies in the Conservatorium Library available on short loan. Students are also required to bring an A4 music manuscript book for class work and homework exercises.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Accurately notate the pitch, rhythm, and harmony of music sound examples that use the Western tonal vocabulary, to the standard set out in relevant units of the course textbook
  • LO2. Accurately vocalise the pitch, rhythm, and harmony of notated music examples that use the Western tonal vocabulary, using solmisation syllables where appropriate
  • LO3. Discern and represent important musical features from a range of examples (including vernacular and non-Western music), and draw deeper conclusions as to how this music works and why
  • LO4. Evaluate and refine transcription strategies through the process of reflective annotation

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No further changes.

Students are expected to attend a minimum of 90% of timetabled activities for a unit of study, unless granted exemption by the Dean, Head of School or professor most concerned. The Dean, Head of School or professor most concerned may determine that a student fails a unit of study because of inadequate attendance. Alternatively, at their discretion, they may set additional assessment items where attendance is lower than 90%.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.