Skip to main content
Unit of study_

MCGY2615: The Ultimate Art: 400 Years of Opera

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Sydney

Since its beginnings around 1600, no genre of Western art music has been more innovative or influential than opera. It has inspired devotion and disdain, and led to innumerable theoretical debates. In this unit, 400 years of changing operatic practices will be explored through a series of seminal works. These will be treated as documents of specific historical circumstances (including contemporaneous singing and staging practices), and as aesthetic objects which have been reinvented continuously down to the present.

Unit details and rules

Unit code MCGY2615
Academic unit
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
MCGY2611 or MCGY2612 or MCGY2613 or MUSC1506
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Alan Maddox, alan.maddox@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Alan Maddox, alan.maddox@sydney.edu.au
Michael Halliwell, michael.halliwell@sydney.edu.au
David Larkin, david.larkin@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Module Tasks
A short written task for each of the unit's 3 modules, each task worth 20%
60% Multiple weeks 3 x 800-900 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Assignment Essay
Individual research essay
40% STUVAC
Due date: 27 Nov 2020 at 23:59
2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Essay: Students will be required to write one essay of 2,000 words during the semester. A list of suggested essay topics will be provided but, with the prior approval of the relevant module coordinator, students are encouraged to choose a topic of their own. Topics may relate to any of the unit’s three modules.

Module Tasks: In each of the three modules, you will be required to undertake a short written task (c.800-900 words). Each task is worth 20%. This might involve some aspect of source analysis or performance-practice criticism. Tasks for each module will be set by the relevant module coordinator.

Assessment criteria

The following assessment criteria are used for written work in this unit of study:

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Demonstrates high level of initiative in research and reading; sophisticated critical analysis of evidence; high level engagement with theoretical issues, innovative use of reading/research material and impressive command of underlying debates and assumptions; properly documented and written with style, originality and precision.

Distinction

75 - 84

Demonstrates initiative in research and wide, appropriate reading; complex understanding of question and ability to critically review material in relation to underlying assumptions and values; analyses material in relation to empirical and theoretical contexts; properly documented; clear, well-developed structure and argument with some signs of literary style.

Credit

65 - 74

Evidence of broader understanding than pass level; offers synthesis with some critical evaluation of material; coherent argument using a range of relevant evidence; some evidence of independent thought, good referencing. A high credit (70-74) shows some evidence of ability to problematise and think conceptually.

Pass

50 - 64

Written work meets basic requirements in terms of reading/research; relevant material; tendency to descriptive summary rather than critical argument; makes a reasonable attempt to avoid paraphrasing; reasonably coherent structure; often has weaknesses in particular areas, especially in terms of narrow or underdeveloped treatment of question; acceptable documentation.

Fail

0 - 49

Work may fail for any or all of the following reasons: Unacceptable paraphrasing; irrelevance of content; poor spelling; poor presentation; grammar or structure so sloppy it cannot be understood; failure to demonstrate understanding of content; insufficient or overlong word length.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 The Song of Orpheus: the origins and establishment of opera in Italy Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 02 The flowering of the Baroque in Europe Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 03 Return to Orpheus: Opera Buffa, Tragédie en musique and Reform Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 04 The Age of Enlightenment Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Early nineteenth-century operatic varieties Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 06 Verdi and melodic drama Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 07 Wagner and the total artwork Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 08 Nationalist opera and verismo Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 09 Twentieth-century directions Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 10 Opera post-Holocaust Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Contemporary eclecticism 1 Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Contemporary eclecticism 2 Online class (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

The set text for this Unit of Study is:

Cannon, Robert. Opera. Cambridge Introductions to Music. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012

(available as an e-book through the library catalogue, though you may wish to buy your own copy). Portions of this will be assigned as weekly reading.

Many other resources needed for this unit will be available online through the unit website in Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate a sound knowledge of the origins and development of opera
  • LO2. Demonstrate familiarity with a representative range of operatic repertoire both as audio-visual experience and from the score
  • LO3. Think, write and speak cogently about opera from its beginnings to the present day, from a variety of critical perspectives.
  • LO4. Demonstrate detailed knowledge of an individual topic chosen for the main essay.
  • LO5. explain opera’s relationship with other musical and theatrical genres, the role it has played in society throughout its history, and its place in the music industry today.
  • LO6. Engage respectfully with the views of others through discussion, and contribute to peer learning

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

In response to student feedback, we have reviewed the amount of listening required over the course of the semester.

The assessments for this unit have been amended from those shown in the Handbook, to accommodate the move to online learning in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.