Thank you very much to the wonderful 27 students (36% of the class) who took the trouble to complete the USS this year, and provide us with comments. It was greatly appreciated as this unit was in it’s second run and I’d made quite a few changes based on the 2018 USS. While the response rate was lower than I’d hoped for, the mean satisfaction score for ‘quality of teaching by the teacher(s)’ was a really pleasing 4.63 (out of 5.0) up from 4.41 last year, thank you!!. The scores for the 5 other questions varied from 4.04 to 4.59. Put another way, for each question 74.0 – 96.3 % of students agreed, or strongly agreed, positively with statements about areas such as having good access to valuable learning resources, and the unit fostering critical and analytical thinking. The lowest scoring item at 4.04 was ‘I have been guided by helpful feedback on my learning’. Across all Universities this is a common problem, and there is much research underway on why scores around ‘feedback’ are consistently lower than other scores, so I will investigate the research and ensure it is addressed for the next cohort of students, including more feedback at more frequent intervals. While the numbers are great, the most important thing I find is the comments you provide. As a qualitative researcher, I look for patterns, clusters and themes in the comments in order to address student concerns. Most students enjoyed all three modules, a typical statement being: ‘I enjoyed the tutorial components of the ultrasound unit as this really helped my understanding of sonography. [The tutor] was always available during the tutorials and was constantly checking if we had any questions. The ultrasound module overall was very interesting, as well as the image interpretation module. The RadFolio also helped when it came to preparing for job applications and interviews by allowing us to reflect on our experiences throughout the degree’. A number of respondents also commented that the Image Interpretation module helped consolidate their learning of this area. The thing respondents felt most needed improvement was the ‘ePortfolio’ module. Individual comments on this from 2018 consistently indicated this module should come earlier, so this year we rescheduled it to be first up in the semester. A few comments still suggested that it would be better earlier, so I will investigate the possibilities here. There were some useful critiques on the assessment weightings and timings which will be incorporated next year. Many students took the time to give us detailed comments which we really appreciate. We had some great compliments, thank you, and some very useful constructive criticism. One student commented: ‘Fantastic topic, probably the best subject from the whole masters course!’ Thank you to that person!! Once again, thank you for your feedback, see you at Graduation, and best of luck with your new careers. Kindest regards, Jill