Skip to main content
Unit of study_

NURS5101: Interprofessional Open Dialogue

Semester 1, 2020 [Block mode] - Mallett Street, Sydney

The Australian social and health care workforce needs to adapt to rapidly changing emphases on health care service provision, in particular working with a stronger focus on early intervention, families and community. The innovative Open Dialogue approach orients service provision around a series of network meetings that involve the individual in crisis or psychological distress, family members, and others in the individual's support network, including professional helpers. The Open Dialogie approach is based on seven principles of treatment: 1) Immediate help, 2) A social network perspective 3) Flexibility and mobility 4) Responsibility 5) Psychological continuity 6) Tolerance of uncertainty; and 7) Dialogism. This unit of study introduces these principles by focusing on how health care services can be organised, and healthcare practices adapted, to facilitate Open Dialogue network meetings, and how network meetings are organised to empower service users and families to genuinely participate in transparent decision-making processes. The course will be taught using a blended learning approach of both online discussions to familiarise students with key readings and ideas, and four study intensive blocks that will provide opportunity for experiential learning. At all points in the course, students are encouraged to reflect on the relevance of course content to their own practice context.

Unit details and rules

Unit code NURS5101
Academic unit Nursing and Midwifery
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

Completion of a clinical undergraduate qualification if not a postgraduate student in Sydney Nursing School.

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Niels Buus, niels.buus@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Niels Buus, niels.buus@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Assessment 1: Research evaluation essay
Essay
40% Week 08
Due date: 20 Apr 2020 at 23:59
2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO2
Assignment Assessment 2: Reflective practice essay
Essay
50% Week 14 (STUVAC)
Due date: 01 Jun 2020 at 23:59
3500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3
Assignment Assessment 3: Participation via DIscussion Board
Participation
10% Weekly Min. 13 x 100 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Assessment summary

  • Assessment 1: Research evaluation essay: Students will critically evaluate a seminal Open Dialogue study.
  • Assessment 2: Reflective practice essay: Students will critically discuss a particular aspect of Open Dialogue practice that interests or challenges them, by explicitly drawing on the Open Dialogue literature.
  • Assessment 3: Participation via Discussion Board: Students must contribute at least 100 words per week to online discussions. Each comment must demonstrate reflective engagement with material from the unit of study, including relevant and explicit references to this material.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introductions and outline: the core principles of Open Dialogue 1 Online class (5 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 02 The core principles of Open Dialogue 2 Online class (5 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 03 The core principles of Open Dialogue 3 Online class (5 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 04 The core principles of Open Dialogue 4 Online class (5 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 05 Study day 1 and 2: Organising and executing Open Dialogue network meetings Lecture and tutorial (15 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Empirical evidence I Online class (5 hr) LO2
Week 06 Empirical evidence 2 Online class (8 hr) LO2
Week 07 Fidelity measures of Open Dialogue Online class (15 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 08 Models similar to Open Dialogue Online class (5 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 09 Collaborative decision-making in Open Dialogue Online class (5 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 10 Reflection in Open Dialogue 1 Online class (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Week 11 Study day 3 and 4: The practices of reflection in Open Dialogue Lecture and tutorial (15 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Reflection in Open Dialogue II Online class (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Week 12 Integrated care Online class (8 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 13 Winding up Online class (15 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: In accordance with Sydney Nursing School’s Resolutions of the School, students must meet the minimum attendance requirements for each unit of study. Coursework policy states that if students are absent without leave for more than 10% of classes in a particular unit of study in any one semester, the Dean may call upon them to show cause why they should not be deemed to have failed that unit of study. Alternatively, students may be required to complete an extra assessment as remediation. This assessment will be set by the unit coordinator and may take the form of an essay or other substantial piece of academic work. The assessment will be given a grade of Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory. Failure to complete and pass the assessment may result in failure of the unit of study.
  • Referencing style: The Sydney Nursing School has adopted th American Psychological Association (APA) Referencing style, 6th Edition, 2010 as its official referencing style. This is an author-date style of referencing.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library eReserve, available on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate early development of the ability to plan, organise, moderate, and evaluate Open Dialogue network meetings collaboratively
  • LO2. analyse and critically discuss the evidence-base and the ‘person-centeredness’ of Open Dialogue and compare Open Dialogue to similar resource-oriented approaches
  • LO3. demonstrate a critical understanding of the significance of highly integrated health care services
  • LO4. demonstrate early development of the ability to reflect openly in front of the family and network during network meetings, while tolerating uncertainty and pursuing a dialogical position.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.