Skip to main content
Unit of study_

OPMG6879: Program and Portfolio Management

Semester 1b, 2023 [Online] - Online Program

Programs are temporary, flexible organisation structures created to coordinate, direct and oversee the implementation of a set of related projects and activities to enable the implementation of strategy and change and the realisation of benefits. A project portfolio is a set of projects and/or programs and other activities, which are not necessarily related, brought together with the aim of alignment with achievement of organisational goals, optimum use of resources and minimisation of portfolio risk. For the program, shared vision and values are important due to high levels of interrelatedness and interdependence that increase complexity. Project portfolio management is a dynamic decision-making process in which new projects and programs are evaluated, selected, prioritised and balanced to align projects with strategy and resource capability and deliver maximum value from project investments. This Unit addresses the nature, design and management of programs and portfolios. It specifically addresses the selection, prioritisation and balancing of multiple programs and projects which have been grouped to support an organisation's strategic portfolio. The allocation of programs of work within a multi-project environment, benefits definition and realisation, governing, controlling and supporting the organisation's strategy, are considered. Students will learn and practice the issues to be considered in selecting an effective organisation portfolio and how to implement a portfolio management framework. Strategic resourcing, risk and opportunity, funding, governance structures and processes, at program and portfolio levels will also be addressed.

Unit details and rules

Unit code OPMG6879
Academic unit Project Management
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
PMGT5879
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Lynn Crawford, lynn.crawford@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Harold Ainsworth, harold.ainsworth@sydney.edu.au
Practitioner(s) Gerard McGarry, gerard.mcgarry@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation Discussion
Discussion
12% Multiple weeks Various
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment group assignment Assignment 1 - Portfolio Management Case Study
Portfolio Management Case Study - Team based
20% Please select a valid week from the list below approx. 20 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO7
Assignment group assignment Assignment 2 - Program Management Case Study
Program Management Case Study - Team based
20% Please select a valid week from the list below approx. 20 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO7 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Assignment 3 - Reflective Journal
Reflective Journal
12% Week 07 approx. 10 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Assignment 4 - Selected Case Analysis
Selected Case Analysis
12% Week 08 approx. 5 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO7 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Assignment Assignment 5 - Learning Application
Learning Application
12% Week 08 approx. 5 pages or 5 minute video
Outcomes assessed: LO5 LO6 LO7 LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Tutorial quiz Quiz
Quiz
12% Weekly Various
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • Assignment 1 – group: For a case study provided select the proposed portfolio for the organisation from the list of possible projects, describing your process and assumptions, and also recommend how it should be monitored during implementation.
  • Assignment 2 – group: For a case study organisation provided, prepare selected nominated parts of the program plan that both describe the program objectives and how it will be delivered, so that management can approve the plan.
  • Assignment 3: For each of the 6 weeks, summarise several of your key learnings, and suggest with specific examples how you might apply these in the future. Submit at the end of the session.
  • Assignment 4: Analyse a program case that you select, highlighting what worked well or did not work well in achieving the planned outcomes.
  • Assignment 5: Prepare a brief note or a five-minute video presentation discussing your key learnings from the unit of study, and how they can be applied by organisations to improve their portfolio and program management practice.
  • Discussion forums: Participate with other students by contributing posts in the 4 online forums (weeks 1-4) based on the topics provided.
  • Knowledge quiz: Answer the 4 questions (mostly multiple choice) provided for each of the 6 weeks to test knowledge of the unit material covered.

Assessment criteria

Result name Mark Range Description
High Distinction 85-100 Work of an exceptional standard
Distinction 75-84 Work of a very high standard
Credit 65-74 Work of a good standard
Pass 50-64 Work of an acceptable standard
Fail 0-49 Does not meet the learning outcomes or assessment requirements at an acceptable standard

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

For every calendar day up to and including ten calendar days after the due date, a penalty of 5% of the maximum awardable marks will be applied to late work. The penalty will be calculated by first marking the work, and then subtracting 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date. Example: Consider an assignment's maximum awardable mark is 10; the assignment is submitted 2 days late; and the assignment is marked as 7/10. After applying the penalty, marks will be: 7 - (0.5 x 2) = 6/10. For work submitted more than ten calendar days after the due date a mark of zero will be awarded. The marker may elect to, but is not required to, provide feedback on such work. Refer to section 7A of Assessment procedures policy available at: http://sydney.edu.au/policies/showdoc.aspx?recnum=PDOC2012/267&RendNum=0

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Please select a valid week from the list below Final reading and assignment work Independent study (14 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 01 The Context for Program and Portfolio Management Independent study (14 hr) LO1
The Context for Program and Portfolio Management: Live Session Workshop (1.5 hr) LO1
Week 02 Portfolio Management Independent study (14 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Portfolio Management: Live Session Workshop (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 03 Program Management Independent study (14 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Program Management: Live Session Workshop (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 04 Governance, Reporting and Business Cases Independent study (14 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO7
Governance, Reporting and Business Cases: Live Session Workshop (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO7
Week 05 Risk and Benefits Independent study (14 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Risk and Benefits: Live Session Workshop (1.5 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 06 Change and Stakeholders Independent study (14 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO7
Change and Stakeholders: Live Session Workshop (1.5 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 07 Final reading and assignment work Independent study (14 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance, active engagement and contribution to the Live Sessions are required

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Readings as specified in Canvas including some material available at Sydney University Library Reserves 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Select, prioritise and balance program and portfolio components required to implement organisational strategy.
  • LO2. Develop and monitor a strategic resource and finance plan considering the quality, quantity and sourcing of the required resources for programs and portfolios.
  • LO3. Assess program and portfolio level risks and opportunities and recommend responses.
  • LO4. Identify, define and develop a strategy for realisation of project and program benefits.
  • LO5. Design and maintain a program vision, business case, change and execution approach, knowledge sharing and governance framework to deliver desired outcomes and benefits.
  • LO6. Select and apply analytic techniques to predict future portfolio performance, evaluate implications of program and portfolio decisions and assess alternative solutions.
  • LO7. Devise processes for program and portfolio performance reporting and knowledge sharing.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Initial version of a new Unit

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.