Skip to main content
Unit of study_

PCOL5103: Therapeutics and Device Innovations (Project)

Semester 1, 2021 [Online] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit of study will provide students with the knowledge and skills to identify and evaluate complex technical problems and develop an implementation plan to address a problem. The unit will involve case studies from both pharmaceutical and medical device sectors, industry experts and application of international standards. Students will be given a problem from real life case studies and work through the steps to develop an implementation plan. In addition to submitting written reports, students will present their final implementation plan through recorded presentations.

Unit details and rules

Unit code PCOL5103
Academic unit Pharmacy
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
PCOL5101 or PCOL5102
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Hui Ong, ong.hui@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Hui Ong, ong.hui@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Online task 510(k) CA (Peer Review)
Discussion Board
5% Formal exam period At least 3 questions on a peer's work
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO6 LO5
Online task Ethics Protocol 1 (Peer Review)
Discussion Board
5% Mid-semester break At least 3 questions on a peer's work
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO6 LO4
Assignment Record of Invention
Written task
15% Week 02 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO5 LO6
Assignment Ethics Protocol 1
See Canvas for details
10% Week 04 800 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO6
Assignment Presentation
Recorded presentation
15% Week 06 5 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Online task Presentation (Peer Review)
Discussion Board
5% Week 07 Comment on 2 peer's presentations
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Assignment Case Study
Case study
15% Week 09 Part A: 500 words, Part B: 750 words
Outcomes assessed: LO5 LO6
Assignment Ethics Protocol 2
See Canvas for details
10% Week 11 800 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO6 LO4
Online task Ethics Protocol 2 (Peer Review)
Discussion Board
5% Week 12 At least 3 questions on a peer's work
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO6 LO4
Assignment 510(k) CA summary
Written task
15% Week 13 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO5 LO3 LO6

Assessment summary

  • Record of invention: Students will draft a record of invention that will form the basis for a provisional patent application based on a given scenario using a preliminary data package and the template provided.
  • Ethics protocols: Based on the given scenario, students will design a phase 1 clinical trial protocol for the product using the template provided. 
  • Ethics protocol 1 and ethics protocol 2 (peer reviews):  For both ethics protocol tasks, students will be assigned a partner to review their submission. Students will participate in the Discussion Board by posting at least 3 questions with regard to the assigned partner’s submission. Students will also answer/comment on the questions to clarify/defend their own submission.
  • Presentation: Students will record and upload a 5 minute PowerPoint presentation to the Discussion Board which outlines several key strategies that could be used to defend against claims that may be used against a company.
  • Presentation (peer review): Students are required to watch and comment on at least two different peers' presentations and ask at least 2 questions relating to each of their presentations in the Discussion Board. Students are also required to answer/comment on the questions directed at their own presentation.
  • Case study: Part A: 500 words, Part B: 750 words. Based on a given scenario, students will respond to the questions as per the detailed assessment description and information provided.
  • 510(k) CA summary: Students will draft a 510(k)-submission document using a data package and the provided template.
  • 510(k) CA (peer review): Students will critically evaluate their  partner’s regulatory submission. Students will need to participate in the online discussion board by posting at least 3 questions with regards to their partner’s submission. Students will also answer/comment to the questions to defend changes to the device.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Please note, for this unit of study (PCOL5103) the late submission penalty will be 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date for 5 calendar days only. This is to ensure that timely feedback is provided to students. If the assessment is submitted more than 5 calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Module 1: pathway to registration - pharmaceutical intellectual property Online class (10 hr)  
Week 02 Module 1: pathway to registration - pharmaceutical intellectual property Online class (10 hr)  
Week 03 Module 1: pathway to registration - pharmaceutical intellectual property Online class (10 hr)  
Week 04 Module 1: pathway to registration - pharmaceutical intellectual property Online class (10 hr)  
Week 05 Module 1: pathway to registration - pharmaceutical intellectual property Online class (10 hr)  
Week 06 Module 1: pathway to registration - pharmaceutical intellectual property Online class (10 hr)  
Week 07 Module 2: medical device development - changes to existing device Online class (10 hr)  
Week 08 Module 2: medical device development - changes to existing device Online class (10 hr)  
Week 09 Module 2: medical device development - changes to existing device Online class (10 hr)  
Week 10 Module 2: medical device development - changes to existing device Online class (10 hr)  
Week 11 Module 2: medical device development - changes to existing device Online class (10 hr)  
Week 12 Module 2: medical device development - changes to existing device Online class (10 hr)  
Week 13 Module 2: medical device development - changes to existing device Online class (10 hr)  

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Understand the importance of intellectual property protection in the commercialisation process of medical technologies and the different regulations that governs its protections
  • LO2. Summarise the processes in the application of a new invention and patent
  • LO3. Apply the principals of good clinical practice and good record keeping during the early phases of medical technology development
  • LO4. Design first in human clinical trials for therapeutics and medical devices
  • LO5. Evaluate and defend the scientific designs and claims of a new medical technology invention
  • LO6. Define the processes, documentations and regulatory requirements during the different phases of medical technology development.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered. We value your feedback about any aspect of the unit of study and your experience as a student of Sydney Medical School. To help ensure our courses meet your needs and maintain a high standard, we welcome your feedback at any time and we ask you to complete the Mid-Semester Evaluation Survey and the unit of study Evaluation Survey at the end of the semester. You can also rate any component of the unit using our star rating system found at the bottom of many pages as you progress through the unit. Your ratings and comments are anonymous and specifying what you liked and didn’t like about any of the learning materials, assessment items, discussion forums, feedback etc will help us to target our improvement efforts. Please note that your participation in this unit of study permits de-identified information about your learning experience and interaction with learning resources to be used for the purpose of improving the student learning experience.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.