Skip to main content
Unit of study_

PHAR6000: Research Methods

Semester 1, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

The Research Methods unit of study prepares students for postgraduate studies. Generic research skills are developed through coursework, assignments, reports and presentations. The Unit of Study covers topics such as framing a research question, conducting systematic reviews, critical appraisal of research studies, study design and protocol development, data management, scientific writing and publication, presentations, basic statistics and other topics necessary for candidates to successfully complete the Master of Philosophy.

Unit details and rules

Unit code PHAR6000
Academic unit Pharmacy
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Edwin Tan, edwin.tan@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Edwin Tan, edwin.tan@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Skills-based evaluation Supervisor’s feedback
Report
10% STUVAC
Due date: 07 Jun 2021 at 23:59
N/A
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4
Assignment hurdle task Research project protocol
Report
40% STUVAC
Due date: 07 Jun 2021 at 09:00
15-20 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3
Assignment Progress report 1 on meeting with research supervisor
Report
5% Week 05
Due date: 02 Apr 2021 at 17:00
2 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Progress report 2 on meeting with research supervisor
Report
5% Week 10
Due date: 14 May 2021 at 17:00
2 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO5
Presentation Critical appraisal of journal article
Oral presentation
10% Week 11
Due date: 18 May 2021 at 11:00
10 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Presentation Research project protocol
Oral presentation
20% Week 13
Due date: 04 Jun 2021 at 10:00
10 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO6
Assignment Data management assignment – statistics
Take-home assignment
10% Week 13
Due date: 01 Jun 2021 at 23:59
6 problems
Outcomes assessed: LO7
hurdle task = hurdle task ?

Assessment summary

  • Critical appraisal of journal article: Short oral presentation to be made on critical evaluation of a journal paper using the techniques presented in the critical appraisal lectures. Each student will present a paper relating to their own project. Tutor will check the paper to make sure it is eligible for presentation. Students and tutors will provide critical comments and discussion at the session.
  • Progress report 1 on meeting with supervisor: Students will meet with their research supervisors to discuss their progress on the project. Topics can cover progress on design of research question and project, data collection, presentation of findings, obstacles to progress. A one to two-page written summary of research question, aims, and methods will be collected and discussed in class.
  • Progress report 2 on meeting with supervisor: Students will meet with their research supervisors to discuss their progress on the project. Topics can cover progress on design of research question and project, data collection, presentation of findings, obstacles to progress. A one to two-page written summary of research question, aims, and methods will be collected and discussed in class.
  • Research project protocol: The focus of this presentation is on the research protocol developed during the course. Preliminary data, if available, may also be presented.
  • Research project protocol: Written report of research protocol.
  • Supervisor’s feedback: Student’s research capability and commitment will be assessed by their supervisors.
  • Data management assignment - statistics: Complete problems about the principles of data management.
  • Repeating students: Exemption from components for students repeating PHAR6000will not be granted./ Exemption from components for students repeating PHAR6000 will only be granted by the Academic Director Research Education for students who achieved a grade of Credit (65%) or above for the relevant components in their previous attempt completed no more than three calendar years prior, and the relevant component has not significantly changed since the student completed it. Applications for exemption must be made in writing (which includes email) to the unit of study coordinator. Students who have been granted a component exemption in writing, together with any consequent change in the weighting of the remaining components in the unit of study, cannot attend the classes for that component and will have their overall mark for PHAR6000 based upon their performance in the remaining components in the unit of study. Component marks from a previous attempt will not be carried over. The exemption will not become effective until the student has accepted it in writing. Until this time the student must continue to attend all compulsory classes. If an exemption is accepted, the exempted student is not permitted to attend classes for the component for which they have received the exemption

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

At HD level, a student demonstrates an aptitude for the subject and a well-developed understanding of the unit material. A ‘High Distinction’ reflects exceptional achievement and is awarded to students who demonstrate the ability to apply their subject knowledge and understanding to produce original solutions for novel or highly complex problems and/or comprehensive critical discussions of theoretical concepts.

Distinction

75 - 84

At DI level, a student demonstrates an aptitude for the subject and a well-developed understanding of the units material. A ‘Distinction’ reflects excellent achievement and is awarded to a student who demonstrates an ability to apply their subject knowledge and understanding of the subject to produce good solutions for challenging problems and/or a reasonably well-developed critical analysis of theoretical concepts.

Credit

65 - 74

At CR level, a student demonstrates a good command and knowledge of the unit material. A ‘Credit’ reflects solid achievement and is awarded to a student who has a broad general understanding of the units material and can solve routine problems and/ or identify and superficially discuss theoretical concepts.

Pass

50 - 64

At PS level, a student demonstrates proficiency in the material. A ‘Pass’ reflects satisfactory adequately referencing the original source of the work.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 03 Data management Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Questions and Study Design Workshop (2 hr) LO3 LO5
Writing a Protocol Workshop (2 hr) LO5
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 04 Data Management Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Systematic Reviews Workshop (2 hr) LO1
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 05 Data Management Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Systematic search methods Workshop (2 hr) LO1
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 06 Survey design Workshop (2 hr) LO3 LO5
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 07 How to get your paper published Workshop (2 hr) LO6
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 08 Data Management Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Critical appraisal - Trials Workshop (2 hr) LO2
Critical Appraisal - Observational studies Workshop (2 hr) LO2
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 09 Data Management Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Scientific Presentation Skills Workshop (2 hr) LO6
Critical appraisal - Animal studies Workshop (2 hr) LO2
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 10 Data Management Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Critical appraisal - Qualitative studies Workshop (2 hr) LO2
Protocol progress checkup Workshop (2 hr) LO3 LO4
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 11 Data Management Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Student Oral Presentations - Critique a paper Presentation (2 hr) LO2 LO5
Interpreting statistics 1 Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 12 Data Management Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Interpreting statistics 2 Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6
Week 13 Data Management Workshop (2 hr) LO7
Critical appraisal - "Big data" studies Workshop (2 hr) LO2
Final Student Presentations - Protocols Presentation (5 hr) LO6
Seminar Seminar (1 hr) LO6

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: Students are expected to attend a minimum of 85% of compulsory activities for a unit of study, unless granted exemption by the Dean, Associate Dean or coordinator. The Dean, Associate Dean or coordinator most concerned may determine that a student fails a unit of study because of inadequate attendance. Alternatively, at their discretion, they may set additional assessment items where attendance is lower than 90%. 
If a seminar/workshop is missed due to illness or misadventure, students are to submit a special consideration application along with supporting documentation. Students arriving more than 10 minutes after the commencement of the seminar/ workshop will be marked as absent. Students swapping a class without prior approval from the UoS co-ordinator will be marked as absent.” 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. systematically search literature at an advanced level to identify research on a specific question
  • LO2. conduct a critical appraisal of a published study and present an oral presentation
  • LO3. plan a research project through effective collaboration with supervisors and other researchers
  • LO4. collaborate as required to progress towards a planned research objective
  • LO5. write a research protocol
  • LO6. report and present research findings at a high internationally acceptable standard
  • LO7. understand basic descriptive and inferential statistics.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Data management content has been revised.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.