Skip to main content
Unit of study_

PMGT5875: Project Innovation Management

Semester 1, 2020 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Innovation is widely-recognised as a major driver of economic growth. Yet innovation projects can be difficult to manage: they typically involve a high level of uncertainty, and many organisations are unsatisfied with the level of innovation they achieve. In this unit of study, we focus on issues in the management of innovation projects at the individual project level, organisational level and across networks of organisations. Since a systematic approach can and does improve our effectiveness in managing innovation, we begin by exploring several different process models of the stages through which innovation projects are managed. We discuss context and challenges which impact such projects, as well as the concepts of creativity and intellectual property management. Using focused case studies, we analyse best practice in the structures and processes that organisations can provide to enable innovation, as well as to support the search, selection, implementation, dissemination, feedback and evaluation stages of their innovative projects. We also examine the impact of networks on innovation (e.g. collaboration networks), national innovation policies and systems, and trends towards open innovation.

Unit details and rules

Unit code PMGT5875
Academic unit Civil Engineering
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Petr Matous, petr.matous@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Peer-review feedback
Feedback on work of other students
20% Multiple weeks 250 words per submission
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Active participation
Meaningful and timely contributions in classes and online
10% Multiple weeks Various
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Mid-term mini-essay
Essay demonstrating understanding of the content course
10% Week 05 500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Presentation group assignment Innovation research review
Presentation of a research review in innovation project management
15% Week 07 10 min
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO7 LO3
Assignment Final mini-essay
Essay demonstrating understanding of the content course
10% Week 10 500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO7 LO6 LO5
Presentation group assignment Innovation case study
Presentation of an innovation project case study
15% Week 12 10 min
Outcomes assessed: LO2
Assignment Final innovation project report
Final report
20% Week 13 2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • Research review presentation: Teams of students describe, critically analyse, and present their assessment on a recent study related to project innovation management
  • Case study presentation: Teams of students conduct a case study of a real innovation management project.
  • Report: Each student writes a report connecting their case study and provides discussion and conclusions in light of reviewed relevant theory.
  • Essays: Students demonstrate their understanding of the core content of the course in their essays.
  • Peer-review feedback: Students provide constructive writtent feedback on other students’ work.
  • Active participation: The qualitity and timeliness of the students’ contributions to discussions during the semester will be assessed.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes at an exceptional standard (e.g. final report could be published in peer-reviewed proceedings, presentations could be presented at a professional conference, and essays could be published in reputable magazines of PM profession.)

Distinction

75 - 84

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes at a very high standard but not quite at the publishable level described above.

Credit

65 - 74

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes at a good standard.

Pass

50 - 64

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes at an acceptable standard.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

In class activities can only be conducted in the respective "blocks" of delivery and cannot be postponed or substituted without a special consideration. For every calendar day up to and including ten calendar days after the due date, a penalty of 5% of the maximum awardable marks will be applied to late work. The penalty will be calculated by first marking the work, and then subtracting 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date. Example: Consider an assignment's maximum awardable mark is 10; the assignment is submitted 2 days late; and the assignment is marked as 7/10. After applying the penalty, marks will be: 7 - (0.5 x 2) = 6/10. For work submitted more than ten calendar days after the due date a mark of zero will be awarded. The marker may elect to, but is not required to, provide feedback on such work. Refer to section 7A of Assessment procedures policy available at: http://sydney.edu.au/policies/showdoc.aspx?recnum=PDOC2012/267&RendNum=0 There may be statistically defensible moderation when combining the marks from each component to ensure consistency of marking between markers, and alignment of final grades with unit outcomes. The University has authorised and mandated the use of text-based similarity detecting software Turnitin for all text-based written assignments.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to innovation Online class (1 hr) LO2
Week 02 Innovation process models Online class (1 hr) LO5
Week 03 Context and challenges in innovation Online class (1 hr) LO1
Week 04 Managing intellectual property Online class (1 hr) LO2
Week 05 The innovative organisation Online class (1 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 06 Search/Exploration stage Online class (1 hr) LO5 LO6
Week 07 Selection stage Online class (1 hr) LO5 LO6
Week 08 Implementation stage Online class (1 hr) LO5 LO6
Week 09 Diffusion and evaluation/feedback stages Online class (1 hr) LO5 LO6
Week 10 Networks and innovation Online class (1 hr) LO2 LO7
Week 11 Open and collective innovation Online class (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO7
Week 12 The role of government in innovation Online class (1 hr) LO1 LO7
Week 13 National innovation systems Online class (1 hr) LO1 LO7

Attendance and class requirements

Full attendance of block-mode classes is compulsory for face-to-face students.

Online students are welcome to the classes, if they wish to meet others in person and participate in the class activities, but this is entirely optional.

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

The most comprehensive reference for this course is:

  • Joe Tidd and John Bessant, Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (5th). Chichester, Wiley, 2013. 9781118360637.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. match innovation, projects and different organisational contexts
  • LO2. identify the impact of innovation in different organisational and business environment
  • LO3. incorporate new methodologies to guarantee a successful project delivery
  • LO4. add new measures to control and monitor projects
  • LO5. add innovation principles to the project management phases
  • LO6. implement new methods to control project phases
  • LO7. interpret different methodologies under different contexts.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit has been restructured with updated content and assessments allowing more flexibility of contributions, particularly to online students. Major adjustments have been made to accommodate students affected by travel restrictions.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.