Skip to main content
Unit of study_

PMGT6812: Integrated Project Delivery Approaches

Semester 1, 2022 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit draws on the past experience and critical thinking skills of advanced students in the evaluation of various project delivery, organisational change management and sustainability frameworks that can be used to successfully deliver projects. Students will critically examine different methodologies, standards, tools and techniques and consider how these can be integrated into tailored project delivery approaches that will address the specific requirements and context of each project. Contemporary project delivery frameworks and methodologies are covered in the unit - including Lean Six Sigma, the PMBoK Project Lifecycle and Process Groups, PRiNCE2, Rolling Wave Planning, Concurrent Engineering, Organisational Change Management, Stakeholder Management, Agile methods and others. Students will work on project case studies and be given the opportunity to develop tailored project delivery approaches that address the requirements and context of specific projects. Students will identify key elements of the project and organise them into a coherent and persuasive argument about the recommended project delivery approach, encompassing consideration of the various risks, benefits, costs and processes involved. Students enrolling in this unit are expected to have already developed a basic level of ability in forming and communicating critical judgments. These provide the foundation for the analytical abilities required in determining specific project delivery approaches for complex projects with different characteristics.

Unit details and rules

Unit code PMGT6812
Academic unit Project Management
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
ENGG5812
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi, mehdi.rajabiasadabadi@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Chris Lawler, chris.lawler@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Portfolio 1
Written activities - select from list of items as per assessment guideline
20% Week 04
Due date: 14 Mar 2022 at 23:59
See detailed assessment guideline
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO5 LO1 LO2 LO4
Assignment Portfolio 2
Written activities - select from list of items as per assessment guideline
40% Week 08
Due date: 11 Apr 2022 at 23:59
See detailed assessment guideline
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO10
Assignment group assignment Evaluative review
Either individual or small group evaluative presentation.
40% Week 13
Due date: 28 May 2022 at 12:00
30 to 60 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO10
Group assignment with individually assessed component = group assignment with individually assessed component ?

Assessment summary

Assessment for this unit has a high degree of flexibly and choice that enables you to explore unit themes that are of most direct interest you. You will also have extensive opportunity to communicate or express your understanding utilising a combination of academic and business practice techniques.

Each Intensive day will include an item that can be included in the following Assessment Portfolio. Portfolios are a selection of assessment items to offer students a choice of expression and topics. 

Portfolio 1  (20%) – establishes a base and begins to explore the unit foundations

Portfolio 2 (40%) - continues to build on the foundation knowledge and early critical thinking to integrate ideas and practice at a higher level as both a practitioner and thought leader.

Presentation (40%) – Either individual or small group activity. This is a culmination presentation that summarises one of the IPD definitions discussed in the unit and then asks you to extrapolate or synthesise your understanding to propose future directions. This is to be delivered either live or via pre-recorded video at the final Intensive Day session.

All students will be asked to peer review and provide feedback for each presentation.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATION NOTE: All tasks may be undertaken individually and can be deferred if needed to meet an individual's needs. 

Students unable to attend the final Block session will need to evaluate based on the session recordings.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas and will be discussed in detail at our live sessions.

 

Study Commitment: Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.  

Text-matching software for Assignment Submission: As part of the assessment process, text matching software such as Turnitin will be used to identify plagiarism and/or be used for providing feedback.

Confidential Peer Evaluation: As part of the group contribution assessment process, collaborative & self-peer evaluation tools (e.g. SparkPlus, CATME, etc.) may be used, either on a confidential or non-confidential basis, to understand contributions and interactions amongst group members. Marks may be adjusted for an individual team member, following on from the peer evaluation process.

Mark Moderation: There may be statistically defensible moderation when combining the marks from each component to ensure consistency of marking between markers, and alignment of final grades with unit outcomes.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Late Penalty: For every calendar day up to and including ten calendar days after the due date, a penalty of 5% of the maximum awardable marks will be applied to late work. The penalty will be calculated by first marking the work, and then subtracting 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date. Example: Consider an assignment's maximum awardable mark is 10; the assignment is submitted 2 days late; and the assignment is marked as 7/10. After applying the penalty, marks will be: 7 - (0.5 x 2) = 6/10. For work submitted more than ten calendar days after the due date a mark of zero will be awarded. The marker may elect to, but is not required to, provide feedback on such work. Refer to section 7A of Assessment procedures policy available at: http://sydney.edu.au/policies/showdoc.aspx?recnum=PDOC2012/267&RendNum=0

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Orientation and introduction Independent study (10 hr) LO2 LO5 LO7
Week 02 Module 1: Context, strategy, purpose and defining key terms Independent study (20 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO10
Week 03 Intensive - Session 1 Workshop (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO9 LO10
Week 04 Module 2: Implementing change and value via contemporary project approaches Independent study (20 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6 LO7 LO8
Week 05 Intensive - Session 2 Workshop (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO10
Week 07 Module 3: Procuring and partnering. Creating sustainable, safe and secure project environments. Independent study (20 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO8 LO9 LO10
Week 09 Intensive - Session 3 Workshop (7 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO10
Week 11 Module 4: people, capability, professionalism and continuous learning Independent study (20 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO9 LO10
Week 13 Intensive - Session 4 Workshop (7 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6 LO8 LO9

Attendance and class requirements

We will meet online for 4 day long Intensive sessions however, for any Sydney based students, an on-campus room can be booked if you require a facility.

The assessment will be a sequenced, practical exploration of 3 different definitions of Integrated Project Delivery. There will be the opportunity to develop and extend practical and creative skills while simultaneously examining what it means to integrate.

Active engagement and peer support will be the hallmark of what is required of students in this unit. The workshops are interactive and not lectures.

Intensive sessions are supplemented by independent study. This is supported by content provided on Canvas. Each student is to dedicate over 100 hours to their studies. 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

There are no specific prescribed readings for this unit. See Canvas site for further details.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. apply critical thinking skills and complex decision making frameworks within a project management context in order to prepare and deliver presentations to senior stakeholders, professional peers and team members
  • LO2. give due consideration to contributing to PM knowledge and promoting PM best practice within the project team
  • LO3. critically evaluate developments in PM knowledge and professional practice across a broad range of sources, and advises on operational implications
  • LO4. critically evaluate differing project delivery approaches and their impact on benefits, change, strategy implementation, risk, governance and the triple constraint
  • LO5. give due consideration to stakeholder characteristics and contexts in selecting and adapting different change, benefits, governance and risk management approaches
  • LO6. critically evaluate the different contemporary project delivery frameworks and methodologies including Lean Six Sigma, the PMBoK Project Lifecycle, Agile methods and others
  • LO7. give due consideration to project characteristics and contexts in selecting and adapting different project delivery frameworks, methods and deployment models
  • LO8. critically evaluate project contracting and procurement approaches with due regard for overall project goals, dependencies and business value
  • LO9. make recommendations and provide thorough and convincing rationale for choice of project delivery approaches for different projects
  • LO10. adapt and combine differing project delivery methods for application to projects in different contexts in order to deliver specific project outputs and outcomes (benefits).

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Most students undertaking this unit previously indicated a preference for longer blocks so this model has been changed from fortnightly to 4 intensive day sessions. Online delivery was extremely popular so this will again be offered with all workshops on Zoom.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.