Skip to main content
Unit of study_

PMGT6850: Project and Program Management Capstone

Semester 2, 2021 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The capstone project aims to provide students with the opportunity to carry out a defined piece of workplace related research and assessment in a way that fosters the development of practical and research skills relevant to project, program and portfolio management. Students will work in small teams on an approved project for the semester. The concepts covered depend on the nature of the project. Students are encouraged to work on a project drawn from or situated in their workplace which would benefit from insights provided by a diverse student team. The intention is to demonstrate integration of learning from the course and the ability to apply this to an identified and defined project.

Unit details and rules

Unit code PMGT6850
Academic unit Project Management
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
24 credit points of 5000 or 6000 level units of study
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Lynn Crawford, lynn.crawford@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Kestrel Stone, kestrel.stone@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment group assignment Project charter
Project Charter
10% Week 03
Due date: 19 Mar 2021 at 23:59
n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment group assignment Project plan
Project Plan
20% Week 05
Due date: 01 Apr 2021 at 23:59
n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Presentation group assignment Status report
Presentation of Project Status Report to client
20% Week 08
Due date: 30 Apr 2021 at 23:59
20 to 30 minutes plus Q&A
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Presentation group assignment Final product report
Final presentation to client and product handover
30% Week 11
Due date: 21 May 2021 at 23:59
n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Post implementation review
Closure Report - project performance and lessons for future projects
20% Week 13
Due date: 04 Jun 2021 at 23:59
20 to 30 minutes plus Q&A
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Assessment for this Unit is based on teamwork to conduct and complete a project:

  • Group work
    • Project charter
    • Project plan
    • Status report
    • Final product report
  • Individual assignments
    • Post implementation review

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

 

Study Commitment:
Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Text-matching software for Assignment Submission:
As part of the assessment process, text matching software such as Turnitin will be used to identify plagiarism and/or be used for providing feedback. 

Confidential Peer Evaluation:
As part of the group contribution assessment process, collaborative & self-peer evaluation tools (e.g. SparkPlus, CATME, etc.) may be used, either on a confidential or non-confidential basis, to understand contributions and interactions amongst group members. Marks may be adjusted for an individual team member, following on from the peer evaluation process.

Mark Moderation:
Mark moderation: There may be statistically defensible moderation when combining the marks from each component to ensure consistency of marking between markers, and alignment of final grades with unit outcomes.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Outstanding quality of work, comparable to what would be expected from a project professional with more than 5 years of project/program management experience

Distinction

75 - 84

High quality of work, comparable to what would be expected from a project professional with 1-5 years of project/program management experience

Credit

65 - 74

Good quality of work, adequately addressing all parts of the assessment task

Pass

50 - 64

Acceptable quality of work, but with some parts of the assessment task missing or completed incorrectly or with poor grammar/formatting of documentation.  

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

For every calendar day up to and including ten calendar days after the due date, a penalty of 5% of the maximum awardable marks will be applied to late work. The penalty will be calculated by first marking the work, and then subtracting 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction - welcome and overview of the capstone unit. Workshop (1 hr) LO1
Week 02 Scoping Meeting with Client - Teams meet with the client for the first time to discuss the background of the project, its objective/s, intended benefits/outcomes, scope of work, assumptions, and constraints. This will provide valuable input to the Project Charter. Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 03 Teams present Project Charter to the client. Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 04 Teams develop the PMP, then send to the client for review 3 days prior before next meeting. Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 05 Present Project Plan to client and gain feedback to ensure that it reflects the direction given at the scoping meeting and aligns with the client’s objectives and expectations. Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 06 Progress meeting with client to review work, resolve issues, raise risks and opportunities, manage expectations, and confirm next steps. Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 07 Progress meeting with client to review work, resolve issues, raise risks and opportunities, manage expectations, and confirm next steps Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 08 Present Project Status Report and relevant extracts from the RADICAL Register to client, discuss issues/changes/next steps Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 09 Progress meeting with client to review work, resolve issues, raise risks and opportunities, manage expectations, and confirm next steps Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 10 Progress meeting with client to review work, resolve issues, raise risks and opportunities, manage expectations, and confirm next steps Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 11 Progress meeting with client to review work, resolve issues, raise risks and opportunities, manage expectations, and confirm next steps Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 12 Final Presentation and Handover to Client Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 13 Post Implementation Review and discussion of lessons learned as an input to the Individual Assignment - the Closure Report. Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Weekly Work on project Project (102 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Weekly team meetings Project (13 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment: It is expected that students will spend at least one full day per week undertaking background research work, organizing their plan of work, gathering data, conducting analysis and preparing their final report and presentation. Projects are to be undertaken in teams as this is how the majority of projects are delivered. Individual projects are an exception to be undertaken under exceptional circumstances with the permission of the lecturer. Even as projects are undertaken by a group of students, each team should maintain a log of contributions to the team’s work. Minutes must be taken for all group meetings and these minutes and other working papers must be handed in when and if requested by the course coordinator. Weekly meetings with supervisor/tutor are required, unless otherwise agreed.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. initiate and coordinate a critical analysis and investigation of project, program and portfolio management processes in a specific context
  • LO2. formulate and justify plans or recommendations for achieving project, program and / or portfolio goals and systemic improvement of performance
  • LO3. convey complex ideas, analysis and recommendations in a manner suited to the specific purpose and audience
  • LO4. demonstrate well-integrated critical judgement concerning content, assumptions, uncertainties and inter-connections
  • LO5. demonstrate understanding of theory and practical context with fluent command of specialist language
  • LO6. demonstrate ability to select and apply current and new project, program and portfolio management knowledge relevant to purpose and audienc
  • LO7. demonstrate understanding of context and of operational implications of plans and recommendations.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Two concurrent streams introduced to cater for students working full time - one stream meets during working hours, one team meets after hours.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.