Skip to main content
Unit of study_

PRFM4117: Embodiment

Semester 1, 2021 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Ways of thinking about how you perceive and make sense of objects, time, place, space, yourselves and others, are pertinent to the study of all aspects of performance. Western thought has not always trusted either the body or experience as valid sources of knowledge about the world. In this unit of study you will explore how theories of embodiment affect research in/of performance and, as a result, question the continued prevalence of mind/body, theory/practice dichotomies.

Unit details and rules

Unit code PRFM4117
Academic unit Theatre and Performance Studies
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Amanda Card, amanda.card@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Essay
Essay
75% Formal exam period
Due date: 25 Jun 2021 at 23:00
4500wd
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Small test Performance description
Performance description
15% Week 09
Due date: 14 May 2021 at 23:00
250wd
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4
Assignment Essay structure
Essay structure
10% Week 13
Due date: 31 May 2021 at 23:00
250wd
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

This unit of study has three assessments: 1 x Performance description worth 15%; 1 x Essay plan worth 10%; 1 x Essay worth 75%. All assessments must be attempted.

Assessment criteria

HONOURS GRADE DESCRIPTORS

These descriptors are to be considered broad indicators and do not replace discipline specific indicators.

80-100: First Class (I)
90+
Work demonstrating the highest levels of accomplishment and intellectual autonomy that can be expected from an undergraduate student. An overall Honours mark of 90 or higher is a requirement for the award of a University Medal, though Medals are not automatically awarded to students with overall results of 90 or more. In many fields of the humanities and social sciences, a mark in this range indicates substantial and innovative research; wide and deep reading in the scholarly literature; sophisticated, perceptive, and original interpretations of data, documentary evidence, fieldwork, literary texts, or works of art; and a very high level of independent thought and argument.  In work written in a language other than English, a mark in this range indicates an excellent level of grammatical accuracy, syntactical sophistication, and nuance in use of vocabulary and register.

85-89
Work that demonstrates a very high level of proficiency in the methodologies, subject matter, and modes of expression and argumentation appropriate to the field or fields studied. Work in this range shows strong promise for doctoral study.  In many fields of the humanities and social sciences, a mark in this range indicates substantial original research; wide and deep reading in the scholarly literature; a very high level of skill in interpreting data, documentary evidence, fieldwork, literary texts, or works of art; and a high level of independent thought. In work written in a language other than English, a mark in this range indicates a very high level of grammatical accuracy with only some mistakes, as well as syntactical sophistication, and nuance in use of vocabulary and register.

80-84
Work that demonstrates a high level of proficiency in the methodologies, subject matter, and modes of expression and argumentation appropriate to the field or fields studied, and shows potential for doctoral study. In many fields of the humanities and social sciences, a mark in this range can indicate thorough research; a firm grasp of the relevant scholarly literature; and a high level of skill in interpreting data, documentary evidence, fieldwork, literary texts, or works of art. In work written in a language other than English, a mark in this range indicates a very high level of grammatical accuracy with few mistakes and only very rare basic errors, with vocabulary and syntax varied and expression highly coherent and well structured.

75-79: Second Class, First Division (II.1)
Work that demonstrates a generally sound knowledge of the methodologies, subject matter, and modes of expression and argumentation appropriate to the field or fields studied. In many fields of the humanities and social sciences, a mark in this range can indicate solid research; a firm grasp of the relevant scholarly literature; and competent interpretations of data, documentary evidence, fieldwork, literary texts, or works of art. However, work in this range may also show evidence of a higher level of independent thought combined with some significant lapses in research or expression. In work written in a language other than English, a mark in this range indicates a high standard of grammatical accuracy with few mistakes and only very rare basic errors, with vocabulary and syntax varied and expression highly coherent and well structured.

70-74: Second Class, Second Division (II.2)
Work that demonstrates an adequate but limited performance in the methodologies, subjects, and/or languages studied. In many fields of the humanities and social sciences, a mark in this range can indicate an adequate general knowledge of the subject from the reading of both primary material and secondary literature, straightforward argumentation, and clear expression. A mark in this range may also reflect a superior performance in one or more of these areas combined with serious lapses in others. In work written in a language other than English, a mark in this range indicates a good standard of grammatical accuracy, albeit with some mistakes, including occasional basic ones; the work shows a good grasp of complex sentence structures and an appropriately varied vocabulary.

65-69: Third Class (III)
Work only barely above the standard of pass-degree work in the field studied. A mark in this range indicates a basic but limited understanding of the methodologies and subject matter of the field or fields studied, and skills in argument and expression that are only just adequate for Honours-level study and research.

Below 65%            

Honours not awarded.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

A late penalty of 5% per day, up to and including ten calendar days after the due date, will apply. The penalty will be calculated by first marking the work, and then subtracting 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date. For work submitted more than ten calendar days after the due date a mark of zero will be awarded. The marker may elect to, but is not required to, provide feedback on such work. Students are advised to apply for simple extensions of 2 days from unit of study coordinator. For longer extension students should apply for special consideration.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Being in the World Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 02 Phenomenology? Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 03 To the body with Maurice Merleau-Ponty I Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 04 To the body with Maurice Merleau-Ponty II Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 05 The perceived world with Maurice Merlau-Ponty Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 06 Body Perception World Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Skill I Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 08 Assessment Presented in Class Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4
Week 09 Skill II Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4
Week 10 The great place space debate Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 11 Present your Essay Plan Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 12 Embodiment? Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 13 Assessment 2 Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Students are expected to attend 90% of classes. 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Readings

Week 2

Smith, David Woodruff, Phenomenology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed)

Wrathal, Mark A. 2009. “Existential Phenomenology”, in Dreyfus & Wrathall, A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 31-47

Week 3 & 4

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945/2010. Part 1 The Body, in Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge

Week 5

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945/2010. Part 2 The Perceived World, in Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge

Week 6

Käufer, Stephan & Anthony Chemero, 2015. Chapter 5 Maurice Merleau-Ponty: the body and perception, in Phenomenology: An Introduction, Cambridge, Polity Press

Carman, Taylor 2008. Chapter 3 Body and World, in Merleau-Ponty, London & New York: Routledge, pp. 78-134

Week 7

Dreyfus, Hubert L., 2014. Merleau-Ponty and recent Cognitive Science in Skilful Coping: Essays on the phenomenology of everyday perception and action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231-248

Christensen, W., J. Sutton and D.J.F. McIlwain. (2006) Cognition in Skilled Action: Meshed Control and the Varieties of Skill Experience, Mind & Language, Vol. 31, No.1, February 2016, pp. 37–66.

Week 9

Ingold, Tim 2011. Walking the Plank: meditations on the process of skill. Being Alive: Essays on Movement Knowledge and Description, New York: Routledge

Week 10

Ingold, Tim 2011. Against Space: place, movement, knowledge. Being Alive: Essays on Movement Knowledge and Description, New York: Routledge

Anon (draft) Ballet as Embodied Freedom: the art of taking up space

Week 12

Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2015. Embodiment on Trial, Continental Philosophy Review, No. 48, pp. 23-39

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. develop an understanding of a range of theories of embodiment
  • LO2. explore how theories of embodiment can inform Theatre & Performance Studies research
  • LO3. develop research skills in relation to an independent research project
  • LO4. develop descriptive writing skills and bring them together with theoretical analysis and organise, plan and develop a long essay

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Reading and structure of this unit have revamped in consultation with former students feedback

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.