Skip to main content
Unit of study_

PSYC6089: Research, Ethics and Professional Practice

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit will introduce students to current standards of ethical and professional practice in clinical psychology and promote life-long learning and understanding. Students will learn to apply current relevant legal framework, mental health practice standards, and the code of ethical practice. The unit will also strengthen theory-practice links by exposing students to a range of topics that are relevant to ethical and professional issues that present in the Psychology Clinic and later in professional life, including cultural competence. Students will attend lectures on research methods and evaluation in clinical research, and a series of seminars where they will listen to second year students who will present clinical cases and brief research presentations. Within this unit of study, students will also begin to plan their own research project and submit a preliminary research proposal. All students are required to attend and contribute to discussion of case and research seminar presentations throughout the semester, and are expected to attend the School Colloquium.

Unit details and rules

Unit code PSYC6089
Academic unit Psychology Academic Operations
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Jemma Todd, jemma.todd@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation hurdle task Clinical case seminars discussion
Participation
0% Multiple weeks
Due date: 13 May 2022 at 15:00
3 x 2-3-hour weekly seminars
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO3 LO2
Participation School Colloquium participation
Participation
0% Multiple weeks
Due date: 27 May 2022 at 16:00
6 x 1-hour weekly colloquium
Outcomes assessed: LO6 LO7
Assignment Preliminary research proposal
Written assignment
0% Week 09
Due date: 01 May 2022 at 23:59
250 words
Outcomes assessed: LO6 LO7
Presentation Clinical Viva Ethics
Clinical viva - ethical scenarios
0% Week 12
Due date: 20 May 2022 at 17:00
20 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3
hurdle task = hurdle task ?

Assessment summary

  • Clinical ethics viva: Students will be asked to demonstrate knowledge of ethical principles and ethical decision making in response to two ethical dilemmas relevant to clinical psychology practice.
  • Clinical case seminars participation: Students will participate in a series of clinical case presentations by second year students. Students must attend all scheduled seminars.
  • Preliminary research proposal: Students will prove a short overview of their planned research project to demonstrate feasibility and methodological soundness.
  • Colloquium participation: Students will participate in the School of Psychology Colloquium presentations. They must attend 50% of the scheduled presentation, depending on their preference
  • Preliminary research proposal (other required activity): Students will complete the research preferences form, to assist with research supervisor allocation.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

Result

Code

Description

Pass
with Merit

PM

The material or clinical practice substantially exceeds the expected level of competence for the stage of training. Reserved for work of an exceptionally high standard that demonstrates independent thought, originality and comprehensive knowledge of the subject area. In order to be awarded a ‘Pass with Merit’, a student needs to perform in the top 10% of students.

Pass

P

The material or clinical practice meets the expected level of competence for the stage of training. A pass is considered to signify work that is of a good to very good standard, according to the relevant expectations.

Meet with Marker

MEET

The written material or clinical practice demonstrates some misunderstanding or a minor deficiency in level of competence. The student must meet with the examiner to discuss the problems with the work. If the marker is satisfied with the outcome of the meeting, the work is given a pass. Alternatively, the student may be required to resubmit or repeat the work.

Resubmit

 

 

RE

 

 

The written material or clinical practice does not meet the required competency. The student must resubmit or repeat the work within a period of time determined by the CPU and the work will be re-marked. Resubmitted or repeated work that on this basis fails to meet the required competency will then be marked independently by a second marker, and a third marker if the two initial markers disagree. Work that is deemed to have failed to meet course requirements by two markers will be assigned a Fail. 

Fail

 F

The written material or clinical practice is of a sufficiently low standard, or demonstrates unethical or dangerous practice. Any piece of written work that is marked with Fail will be marked independently by a second marker, and by a third marker if the two initial markers disagree. Where required, the three markers meet to decide upon a final mark to be awarded. Work that is deemed to have failed to meet course requirements by two markers will be assigned a Fail. In most cases, written assessments and clinical practice assessments examine core clinical competencies, and the Fail mark will result in the Unit of Study being failed. For case reports awarded a Fail mark by two independent markers, the student is required to submit a new case report within one month. The case must not have been previously assessed through case report or case presentation but come from the same clinical placement as the failed case report. If the student fails the second case report, the student fails the Unit of Study and is required to repeat and re-enrol in that Unit of Study. Any Unit of Study that the student is deemed to have failed will have to be repeated, and the student will be required to re-enrol in that Unit of Study. Students are only eligible to repeat Units of Study once.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

If you do not submit an assessment by the due date, and do not have an approved special consideration application, late penalties will apply. The following penalties apply for any assessment submitted late without an extension approved through special consideration: Less than 1 week late > Meet with Marker (MEET) Requirement: Student to meet with Unit Coordinator plus either Director of Clinical Training or Head of the Clinical Psychology Unit. 1-2 weeks late > Resubmit (RE) Requirement: Student to complete a new piece of work and resubmit within one week (eg. new assignment or new case report or new research report). Unit Coordinator to provide new assignment question or instructions. 2 weeks late > Fail (F) Requirement: Result reported as Fail for unit of study on student academic transcript.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Ethical and legal aspects of the registration and regulation of psychologists; Ethical and legal aspects of report writing (Hunt) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 02 Ethical and legal aspects of child protection legislation (Rhodes) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 03 Ethical and legal aspects of confidentiality and consent (Todd) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 04 Ethical and legal aspects of boundaries, dual relationships, and self-disclosure (Rhodes) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 05 Ethical and legal aspects of clients who pose a risk to themselves or others (Todd) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 06 Ethical and legal aspects of telehealth and social media (Rhodes) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 07 Ethical and legal aspects of evidence based practice and working within your competency (Todd) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5
Week 08 Cultural responsiveness (Rhodes) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Week 09 Aboriginal wellbeing (Rhodes) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Clinical case seminar (Hunt & Hawes) Seminar (2.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 10 Research methods and evaluation: Qualitative designs (Rhodes) Lecture (3 hr) LO6 LO7
Clinical case seminar (Hunt & Hawes) Seminar (2.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Research methods and evaluation: Systematic reviews and the ethics of clinical research (Todd) Lecture (3 hr) LO6 LO7
Clinical case seminar (Hunt & Hawes) Seminar (2.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Research methods and evaluation: Empirical designs (Abbott & Hawes) Lecture (3 hr) LO6 LO7
Clinical Viva Ethics (Abbott & Hawes) Clinical practice (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 13 Self care (Rhodes) Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO5

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Demonstrate a knowledge and practice of clinical psychology within the code of ethical practice
  • LO2. Work responsively with a broad range of socially and culturally diverse clients
  • LO3. Undertake practice that is consistent with current relevant legal frameworks and mental health practice standards
  • LO4. Apply advanced psychological knowledge to culturally responsive assessment and interventions in the area of clinical psychology
  • LO5. Operate within the boundaries of professional competency, using peer consultation, and instigating appropriate referral practices
  • LO6. Critically evaluate the scientific literature to inform practice
  • LO7. Use a range of research methods to investigate questions to inform clinical practice.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Case Seminars schedule changes

Work, health and safety

We are governed by the Work Health and Safety Act 2011, Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 and Codes of Practice. Penalties for non-compliance have increased. Everyone has a responsibility for health and safety at work. The University’s Work Health and Safety policy explains the responsibilities and expectations of workers and others, and the procedures for managing WHS risks associated with University activities.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.